moomba
TheBrownDog
We've loaned Abdul Razak and Gui Assulin to Brighton. Will be interesting to see how they go.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would you want to kill off one of the only team's your side has a meaningful rivalry with? Because that is exactly what forcing further sanctions upon them will do.Not that many P*mpey fans even bother to log on these days.
It's feels like yesterday when they were in the premiership and everybody fell in love with them because their fans sang during a loss. Now they barely get 10k.
While I'm at it, when a team goes into administration twice within a couple of seasons the deduction should be more than 10 points!
Apart from that, I wish them all the best!
The thing I don't get with Pompey, they still have players that would be on decent money, why didn't they get rid of them in the summer (or the January window last) when it became obvious they couldn't afford them.
It might lead to relegation by getting rid of the likes of Kanu, Lawrence, Ben Haim, Mokoena, Benjani, but surely getting them off the wage bill was the more important thing to do.
Must say I was relieve to learn its only 10 points... Drew 0-0 today, will be interested to see if fans stage another sit in..
Ban foreign ownership. English game would be better off without it.
Ban foreign ownership. English game would be better off without it.
Not sure what the nationality of owners has to do with it.
Dozens and dozens of incompetent British owners have played their part in destroying many clubs.
Fans can hold British owners to a greater accountability is the point.
We've been there, done that.
It's all the foreign ownership thats created such a gulf in English football between the haves and have nots.
Your club has become a play toy for rich foreigners because of this as have most of the top 5-6 teams in the country.
These top clubs wont have to worry so much about shonky foreign owners because there's always some other rich twat who'll buy them even if they are in massive debt.
Foreign ownership for teams outside that exclusive few teams is a dangerous thing for clubs because they can put the club into debt then just walk away from it too easily.
You need to get the whole foreign/British thing out of your head. It's pure xenophobia.
There are good foreign owners, and bad foreign owners.
There are good British owners, and bad British owners.
If you want to create rules about equality, then by all means suggest some, but they should apply to all clubs, no matter where their owner was born.
As for being a foreign owners play toy, try and educate yourself about what our owner has brought to the club, the community, and what he is hoping to get out of the club.
Why do foreign owners have "play toys", yet British owners don't? More than a whiff of xenophobia, and a few opinions in this debate that Suarez would be proud of.
No, it's wathcing the English game over 30 years become a boring shitfest.
As I said before, it's easier for fans to take action to rid the club of British owners than it is foreign owners if they are ruining the club.
There will never be any equality gained from the EPL. Absolute parasites run it and they don't give a flying **** about the Football League.
One look at the blackmail bullshit they pulled with the youth academy changes proves that.
Excuse my cynicism here.
He went out and bought one of the biggest clubs in England.
If it was less about big noting oneself and the limelight and more about making a difference to a community and a club on the brink then there are a multitude of more apprpriate clubs he could have purchased.
What bollocks.
A great deal of British owners followed the cubs they back, are local businessmen or have had an affiliation with the club in their lifetime.
Just a tad of ivory tower going on there.
BTW, you can point to Darlington as an example of a club destroyed because of mismanagement by an English owner.
Moomba's right on this one.
Ideally all clubs would have the AFL/Barcelona type model of being owned by the members but that's never going to happen.
Portsmouth is a bigger mess than Darlington.
Darlington were a small club who were struggling financially long before Reynolds came along.
I wouldn't call the English game a boring shitfest, still the most watched in the word I believe so it must have something going for it. And even it was, is that because of foreign owners? Don't think so.
That's not actually the case.
Right, so you do know nothing about why he chose Man City? Don't comment about us anymore thanks.
Good for the few of them that do own teams they support, I'm sure we'd all do the same if we had the opportunty. Doesn't mean they'll do a good job though. Ask me who has done more for City, Peter Swales or Sheikh Mansour? Who did more for Southampon, Rupert Lowe or Marcus Liebher? How has being owned by a fan of the club helped Rangers?
Fact remains that a number of British owners are in the game for the same reason as foreign owners. Money, prestige, opportunity.
Some of them are good owners, some of them are not. Why bring nationality into a debate that has nothing to do with nationality?
Portsmouth were in administration before they got rescued by a foreigner.