Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Trade Week 2016 - Live Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monocle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Do we want Ryan for 34 or another mid?

Mid, Mitchell is an excellent addition to our midfield but he'll retire in the next two seasons and we weren't able to bring in any more picks through trade period so we really need to add to the depth of the midfield (as we all know) but more so now in preparation for his and Priddis's retirements. Hopefully clubs see Ryan as too much of a flight risk and the mob down the road have other needs before him. I'd even be tempted pass on Waterman this draft.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

They get Deledio- the best footballer in the country in 2004
0001689394_3x2_340x227.jpg
 
Thinking about it Freo have picks 35 and 40

They'll use one of those on Ryan


Walters, Yarran, Ballantyne, Crozier

I wouldn't have thought Ryan was a need for Freo, but then of course they aren't always known for their common sense when drafting either.
 
Don't get the JOM deal. Who's 2017 R2 pick did the Hawks trade to GC?
It couldn't have been their own since they had already traded their 2017 R1 to StK.

But from Hawks site it says GC got pick 10 and Hawks' 2017 R2.

#freepickhawthorn ???
 
Walters, Yarran, Ballantyne, Crozier

I wouldn't have thought Ryan was a need for Freo, but then of course they aren't always known for their common sense when drafting either.

Most clubs need a flashy small forward so I don't expect him to slide too far. I hope we have a crack at him though but I'm not sure what he is worth to us.
 
So if no one bids for Waterman by pick 73, We should be able to grab him with 106? What happens if he has a bid on him after our pick 54 and before 74 we go into 2017 points?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So if no one bids for Waterman by pick 73, We should be able to grab him with 106? What happens if he has a bid on him after our pick 54 and before 74 we go into 2017 points?

Keyser said if there isn't a pick on Waterman till after our pick 54 we can take Waterman with pick 106 .

Ps we dont have pick 73 anymore .
 
Keyser said if there isn't a pick on Waterman till after our pick 54 we can take Waterman with pick 106 .

Ps we dont have pick 73 anymore .
Surely then we should have been trying to upgrade 54 to increase the chance that the bid comes after our penultimate pick and therefore the chance that we only have to use 106

Would rather go into deficit next year, when presumably the draft isn't as strong.

o wel
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So everyone traded to benefit Hawks and try to get the deal through? Weird how those two traded picks for no reason other than to trade a second rounder to Hawks
Backroom deal would have been done for something. Would happen all the time, I'm sure.
 
Yeah that's why I suggested the DFA. Could alternatively be pick 106 or a PSD pick.

Or waterman. There was talk earlier on that if another club bids on waterman we won't match it. People then seemed to take it as if he gets big on in first 2 rounds then maybe use a third rounder on him. The club make be looking at using our first 3 rounds of picks and picking up waterman with pick 106.
 
Keyser said if there isn't a pick on Waterman till after our pick 54 we can take Waterman with pick 106 .

Ps we dont have pick 73 anymore .
Unless it is pick 55, then we go into 10 points of debt for next season. I'm not sure how that works though, it probably just means our first rounder is worth 10 points less which doesn't change its position.
 
Adelaide have just arrived for the trade negotiations

I found a video of Port's recruiting manager in action this draft period.

not_found_ss.png
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom