- Mar 29, 2005
- 8,407
- 948
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers, Liverpool, Celtics
- Thread starter
- #101
Well he did, he went to Caulfield for six years.north of the river said:Lucky he didn't do his junior training at Caulfield.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Well he did, he went to Caulfield for six years.north of the river said:Lucky he didn't do his junior training at Caulfield.
Well he did, he went to Caulfield for six years.
not even taking one of beauys under 16s n 17s full forward cal sinclair could win you a flag. im sure he has huge regrets leaving shark park to play with a bunch of second grade hacks
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yeah and he did solo training at school every Monday afrternoon, did school training every Tuesday and Thursday night and played matches for school on Saturday.Sorry SS, your right, I forgot he did Full-On training at recess and lunchtime in the schoolyard.
Yeah and he did solo training at school every Monday afrternoon, did school training every Tuesday and Thursday night and played matches for school on Saturday.
I assume Beauy training was Wednesday and Friday, and played for Beauy on Sundays?
The boy trains every day, massive work ethic, don't think he'd be where he was without both clubs, but he certainly went through the majority of his development at Caulfield.
and he kicked seven in the granny, kid got talent nor
robbie cathcart is a gun, love his silk around goal and work ethic. too bad about his involvement in those rape allegations though.....
Were these the rape allegations regarding him raping Ormond, Old Melbournians and then Caulfield. Was easily the best finals player out of the four sides.
Ladder
Old Melb
St Kevs
Caul
Ormond
Old Brig
Collegians
Oak
Haile
Maz
[B]POS TEAM P W L D For Ag Pts %[/B]
1 CAULFIELD 3 3 0 0 533 62 12 859.68
2 OLD MELBURNIANS 3 3 0 0 498 94 12 529.79
3 ST KEVINS 3 3 0 0 400 109 12 366.97
4 OLD BRIGHTON 3 2 1 0 420 157 8 267.52
5 ORMOND 3 2 1 0 286 196 8 145.92
6 DE LA SALLE 3 2 1 0 306 216 8 141.67
7 COLLEGIANS 3 0 3 0 155 352 0 44.03
8 OAKLEIGH 3 0 3 0 91 570 0 15.96
9 OLD HAILEYBURY 3 0 3 0 67 454 0 14.76
10 MAZENOD 3 0 3 0 53 599 0 8.85
Yes, Lachy Nash.is there any reason why people are rating Brighton? as far as i can see there yet to play a real contender only beating marcellin and oakliegh i think and going down to a de la team that most agree aren't a real threat. i know it's not an in-depth analysis but ormond pumped de la who a week earlier got over Brighton. do the boys from the bay have some secret weapon i dont know about?
Melbourne played Caulfield bright and early on Saturday and Melbourne was excited for its first test of the year. Unfortunately it wasn't much of a test as Melbourne got the first couple and never looked back. After being touted as the two men to watch, Spanos and Parsons were really out of their depth in terms of movement and attack on the ball compared to the OM's brigade of tough onballers including Webb, Slade, Carter, and Hayes. Sam Dunell was best afield rebounding the ball relentlessly from half back and was taking marks in conditions that few others could, perplexing the Caulfield forwards who didn't want to get their knees dirty. Melbourne continued their domination throughout the game and ran out winners by 7 or 8 goals in trying conditions.
The story so far seems to be that Melbourne and SKevs are the teams to beat. The other two contenders in Ormond and Caulfield have both suffered defeats and it looks at the moment to be a race in two. Rather boring if you ask me.