6 first rounders...Fair enough. What would the pies request for him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
6 first rounders...Fair enough. What would the pies request for him?
I would have thought it would be 3 for Mitchell and there first atleast, as Mitchell isn't as good as Tyson probably close and the three you mentioned arnt as good as pick 9 for 20P3 for Mitchell and Towers/Reid/Mal I would think is what we'd push for. Depending who the steak knives are we may need to add our 2nd (or Clark compo/PP)
They don't/won't have a 1st with Heeney using thatI would have thought it would be 3 for Mitchell and there first atleast, as Mitchell isn't as good as Tyson probably close and the three you mentioned arnt as good as pick 9 for 20
Disagree....I would have thought it would be 3 for Mitchell and there first atleast, as Mitchell isn't as good as Tyson probably close and the three you mentioned arnt as good as pick 9 for 20
Very goodHow about a Freo/Tigers trade:
Richmond get Crozier and Freo's 2nd rounder
Freo get Vickery and Tigers 3rd rounder
With this Richmond get the small, quick pressure forward they need.
Freo get the tall forward that can pinch hit in the ruck and scores goals.
Pick upgrade is because talls ALWAYS seem to be worth more to clubs (even if fans don't rate them).
The added bonus for Freo would be that they would have Vickery playing 2 Derbies every year and get to see the West Coast fans going off their nuts even more than usual. Looks like a win/win to me.
He won't be going anywhere but for a hypotheticals thread I would think a late top 10 - maybe 15 at a stretch.Fair enough. What would the pies request for him?
How about a Freo/Tigers trade:
Richmond get Crozier and Freo's 2nd rounder
Freo get Vickery and Tigers 3rd rounder
With this Richmond get the small, quick pressure forward they need.
Freo get the tall forward that can pinch hit in the ruck and scores goals.
Pick upgrade is because talls ALWAYS seem to be worth more to clubs (even if fans don't rate them).
The added bonus for Freo would be that they would have Vickery playing 2 Derbies every year and get to see the West Coast fans going off their nuts even more than usual. Looks like a win/win to me.
Except Freo, you aren't going to get Crozier and a pick upgrade for Vickery absolutely no way.
Freo have been bad at trading in the past but not that bad. Even Croz for Vickery isn't fair, let alone with a pick downgrade.How about a Freo/Tigers trade:
Richmond get Crozier and Freo's 2nd rounder
Freo get Vickery and Tigers 3rd rounder
With this Richmond get the small, quick pressure forward they need.
Freo get the tall forward that can pinch hit in the ruck and scores goals.
Pick upgrade is because talls ALWAYS seem to be worth more to clubs (even if fans don't rate them).
The added bonus for Freo would be that they would have Vickery playing 2 Derbies every year and get to see the West Coast fans going off their nuts even more than usual. Looks like a win/win to me.
OkCan't see us getting Crozier. Simply not good enough! TV isn't great but he might develop still
Crozier is vanilla, lacks the tools to be elite IMO
I think ideally he is a winger/HFF. Why do you have reservations over him as a forward? I think he'd be a good distributor of the ball off half back but not so much a body on body small back.Whats Crozier like as a back man? I can only see a very strong team winning a GF with Crozier forward.
I'd do the same deal with our 2nd rounder.Would WB or Carlton do their 2nd rounder for Sinclair and our 3rd?
You'd need to find out if your third round will be tied up with Waterman firstWould WB or Carlton do their 2nd rounder for Sinclair and our 3rd?
Fair enough. What would the pies request for him?
Elliott obviously someone who i think would untouchable for us, so i dont want him gone.Sydney don't really have anything that would genuinely interest us and that you'd be willing to part with especially with Heeney locked away.
However being a hypothetical thread and all that plus him being literally the last player we'd want to trade I'd look at Jetta and exchanging later picks. Is that going to interest Sydney? Nah, but it's the sort of currency Collingwood would require to part with Elliott.
He'd be a strong target though because he could do serious damage in the Sydney forward half.
Elliott obviously someone who i think would untouchable for us, so i dont want him gone.
But a trade would probably involve Tom Mitchell, Jetta i dont particularly rate that highly.
Would WB or Carlton do their 2nd rounder for Sinclair and our 3rd?
Actually, given how crap Warnock and Wood are, it's exactly what you need. Kreuzer isn't great either.The last thing we need is another ruck. Especially an average one.
Would WB or Carlton do their 2nd rounder for Sinclair and our 3rd?
We have three rucks and a competent forward ruck in Levi on the books so unlikely.Would WB or Carlton do their 2nd rounder for Sinclair and our 3rd?
Actually, given how crap Warnock and Wood are, it's exactly what you need. Kreuzer isn't great either.
We'll get Jono Giles instead. Besides, if we wanted a Warnock type we'd just draft Sam Tagliabue from our VFL team.Keeping this post for when we trade you Warnock to replace Ryder.
I don't see him as a ruck, more a marking forward.The last thing we need is another ruck. Especially an average one.