Traded GWS trade #21 and F2 to Brisbane for #15
- Thread starter Taylor
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
Have we confirmed whether the giants traded their own future 2nd or collingwoods?
- Oct 12, 2016
- 6,749
- 7,714
- AFL Club
- GWS
Not sure about this. Our F2 could be 21 again or even worse.....
- Oct 12, 2016
- 6,749
- 7,714
- AFL Club
- GWS
Best if we decide in about 12 months time.
jdeezy
Premiership Player
- Jul 6, 2013
- 4,378
- 11,525
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Brisbane reducing their points this year with this one is interesting, I know Pick 15 was going to get swallowed up anyway but they still need points don't they?
SSSSSS
Brownlow Medallist
- Apr 18, 2011
- 19,662
- 42,377
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Six decades of domination
Bizarre trade from both sides.
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
It is odd..maybe planning to use a future 2nd to buy back in this year..we would probably give a lot of our later picks (which we cant use) for a future 2nd.
Weird trade from both teams.
Yeh waiting to see how this pans out. Confusing a little to see who this favours or why.
- Oct 12, 2016
- 6,749
- 7,714
- AFL Club
- GWS
They just go into negative and next year's picks get adjusted. You can effectively use points across 2 years.
- May 27, 2017
- 6,379
- 9,825
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
If they already have another trade lined up for GWS's future 2nd that gets them more points this year or if they plan to use it as part of getting Dunkley then it makes sense.
- Aug 15, 2011
- 23,789
- 8,392
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide
Might be to trade F1 and F2 (GWS tied) for Dunkley
Claythesmiths
Team Captain
- Sep 28, 2016
- 376
- 789
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
I'm in a minority among Dogs' supporters but I'd be happy(ish) with:
Dunkley + 30 and 39, for:
Brisbane F1, GWSF2 and 21.
Dunkley + 30 and 39, for:
Brisbane F1, GWSF2 and 21.
VinnieB
Norm Smith Medallist
- Oct 28, 2021
- 6,284
- 9,195
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
probably a good trade for the Lions given they will be using up early picks on FS.
jdeezy
Premiership Player
- Jul 6, 2013
- 4,378
- 11,525
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Isn't there still an issue with Brisbane needing to only use the same amount of picks as they have spots? I'm not sure a big bundle of late picks appeals.
Taking a quick run through the calculator, would GC do something like this year's 32 and 36 for the GWS F2? If GC don't need many picks this year it seems a reasonable trade for GC and means Brisbane all up go from 1112 points to 1964.
Gives them only 1000 points
Claythesmiths
Team Captain
- Sep 28, 2016
- 376
- 789
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Leaves them with 30, 34, 35, 39, 46, 73. I expect they could trade 30 down to two picks in the late 30s or early 40s to squeeze out the remaining points they need.
- Oct 12, 2016
- 6,749
- 7,714
- AFL Club
- GWS
They have gained at least 800 points here. Massive trade win for Bris but you need to be in a situation where points are of value.
- Aug 15, 2011
- 23,789
- 8,392
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide
I think Brisbane will need to cut a few more Lester, Ah Chee, McFayden but might re rookie a few if not all
Last edited:
- Oct 16, 2015
- 24,279
- 30,558
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Maybe GWS are looking to bundle a few of their first round picks for something higher up...
- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,445
- 28,080
- AFL Club
- West Coast
That’s paying a lot to move up even by historical standards. Letalone by the farcical points system.
- Jun 19, 2016
- 20,836
- 40,024
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Their list manager suggested as much yesterday.
Similar threads
