We will end up losing one of walker, kersten and I'd prefer them both over stanley & clark
Team Goals for 2015?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We will end up losing one of walker, kersten and I'd prefer them both over stanley & clark
I know that you're his biggest fan YPO and if he could give us 30+ goals then that would help the team to no end. There will be stiff competition for spots though so it will be interesting to see who gets first crack at it!Walker played as a permanent forward would give you better than 30.
Vardy has also played more good 1sts football than Walker or Kersten.
Walker played as a permanent forward would give you better than 30.
Either of the three Clark,Vardy or Walker will give you that 30 goals as a forward given 20 games,doesn't the availability and form of Simpson and McIntosh hold the key here though.Maybe. I'll go with probably not.
For one thing, he'd need to be guaranteed at least 20 games to get close to 30 goals. Little evidence so far that he's going to be preferred to Clark. Or Vardy once he regains fitness. Or if it's a third tall, even Kersten.
Hopefully those blokes will all be kicking a fair few eachTeam Goals for 2015?
I assumed that you pick one meant that Walker would be playing every game- or close to it- to kick those 30 goals. it'd be silly to even mention it otherwise and ypo sure ain't silly.Maybe. I'll go with probably not.
For one thing, he'd need to be guaranteed at least 20 games to get close to 30 goals. Little evidence so far that he's going to be preferred to Clark. Or Vardy once he regains fitness. Or if it's a third tall, even Kersten.
Agree with all of that,the bolded might be gilding the Lilly a bit.Is that what the wink means?I assumed that you pick one meant that Walker would be playing every game- or close to it- to kick those 30 goals. it'd be silly to even mention it otherwise and ypo sure ain't silly.
Vardy has to regain fitness first for this to become any sort of discussion. Then he has to prove form- and first year back from a serious leg injury is always difficult. Walker is one of the fittest individuals at the club, he gives 100% every time he plays and I hope that he gets a real shot at a spot in our forward line. I'd absolutely hate to lose him a la Mark Blake (though totally different types of players), then watch him play well elsewhere- even if as an above average bit player - while we find that we are short one player of his type when others break down again....
I see Walker as the Pods crash and bash type. Maybe even the Hawkins- type strong man. Not sure how he goes as a lead-up mark but he sure can run and crash a pack, can't he? We need him to knock over a few oppo players so they all fear him, then that will leave him free to work some magic in the forward line. Yes, he'd never be dropped from the team if he had Brown's skills and his own body, fitness and determination.Yeah I do not think, even with all these new talls coming in from outside or back from injury will see Walker delisted. I think he has another 2 seasons at the club. He started as a Rookie and then was called into the team because of injuries to KPFs. Yes he is raw - but he has the right attitude and fair physique.
He may yet even find a place down back as a KD - but given he seems durable and willing - and he showed a bit in his biggest game so far - he deserves to be on the list for sure. Sure he is no front runner to make it in the AFL but he has done enough to keep his position for 2 seasons and see what happens from there. He deserves a bit more time IMO.
I will go out on a limb and say he will play more senior games than Brown - and will probably be a bit handier than him at CHF. There are two guys you wish you could join up into one player. The size and attitude of Walker and the marking and kicking skills of Brown (though Walker when he gets confidence is a pretty decent mark).
Yeah I do not think, even with all these new talls coming in from outside or back from injury will see Walker delisted. I think he has another 2 seasons at the club. He started as a Rookie and then was called into the team because of injuries to KPFs. Yes he is raw - but he has the right attitude and fair physique.
He may yet even find a place down back as a KD - but given he seems durable and willing - and he showed a bit in his biggest game so far - he deserves to be on the list for sure. Sure he is no front runner to make it in the AFL but he has done enough to keep his position for 2 seasons and see what happens from there. He deserves a bit more time IMO.
I will go out on a limb and say he will play more senior games than Brown - and will probably be a bit handier than him at CHF. There are two guys you wish you could join up into one player. The size and attitude of Walker and the marking and kicking skills of Brown (though Walker when he gets confidence is a pretty decent mark).
well, that was a short-lived wait to see if Jon Douglas ' prediction would come true, wasn't it?Walker has played 17 so he is 2 ahead already
well, that was a short-lived wait to see if Jon Douglas ' prediction would come true, wasn't it?
Walker has played 17 so he is 2 ahead already
guarantees you are never wrong..
Go Catters
Those kind of predictions are always popular.
Here's one site you can check stats on, JD:Did not know where to look up Brown's stats from to check. Thanks for the info T.
Hey but see it has already happened - I told you Walker would play more games than Brown. No sooner written than done !
Maybe. I'll go with probably not.
For one thing, he'd need to be guaranteed at least 20 games to get close to 30 goals. Little evidence so far that he's going to be preferred to Clark. Or Vardy once he regains fitness. Or if it's a third tall, even Kersten.
How do you think Walker would go if he was tried as a KPD? (I would never let him kick out).
He is big, strong, athletic and has the fitness to run out games.
My concerns would be his kicking and defensive smarts.
But I would still like to see him tried there if he could not get a guernsey in the forward line.
My concern is that Walks could end up being wasted in the VFL and could walk due to lack of opportunities.
So many positive attributes - hopefully with more game time (and I'm hoping CHF), these will outweigh any negative attributes. No player is without flaws - it's just a matter of whether the team can manage to help him overcome them. (Eg like Tom Hawkins is fairly slow and immovable- so we need a small tackling crumber near him to help him out.)How do you think Walker would go if he was tried as a KPD? (I would never let him kick out).
He is big, strong, athletic and has the fitness to run out games.
My concerns would be his kicking and defensive smarts.
But I would still like to see him tried there if he could not get a guernsey in the forward line.
My concern is that Walks could end up being wasted in the VFL and could walk due to lack of opportunities.
Here's one site you can check stats on, JD:
http://afltables.com/afl/stats/alltime/geelong.html
Or, during the season, footywire will have current player stats. If you can't remember this info, just type the player's name into your browser plus the word 'stats' and a few links will come up. AFL tables is my favourite.
Here's one site you can check stats on, JD:
Thanks.
One thing I have noticed, between 07 and 11 we had a lot of defenders running forward and kicking goals. Mackie and Wojo would do it regularly as well as our midfielders in Bartel and Ablett kicking them from 50. (trying to think of what other defenders used to run forward and kick goals? Scarlo used to do it, but I think he did it more 04 - 06)I've been playing around with the idea of making up a table of our goal kicking from the past few years (2007-2014), with the view of finding out what has changed over this period- whether we are kicking as many goals, whether we're as accurate, who's doing the scoring (is it big forwards, crumbers, ruckmen, midfielders?), etc. etc.
With these questions in mind, I've made up a table of our major goal kickers for the past 8 seasons, including the top 8 goal kickers in some calculations.
View attachment 105001
One thing that is niggling at me but I have yet to work on it, is the fact that I recall that we used to have a lot of goal kickers in each game a few years ago but this doesn't seem to happen anymore- I think we've become so Hawkins-focussed that the other forwards haven't been leading up and presenting in and around the 50 as they used to and the goal assists from teammates, with their shorter passes closer to goal, have also diminished.
There are a lot of factors that influence our goal kicking - ranging from how good our ruckmen and midfielders are, how many goals the opposition are kicking against us (we can't be kicking goals if the ball's constantly down the other end of the ground, obviously), how accurate our goal kickers are- which depends on the type of shot they're taking, etc.
The goals dried up in 2012 and 2014 in particular- we kicked about 3-4 goals less per game than we had kicked in previous years. In 2011, Mooney disappeared from the front line, kicking only 9 goals for the year, while Podsiadly became the main goal kicker. In 2012, Hawkins continued his good form from the 2011 GF and became the prime focus of his teammates, with Pods as the second big forward. In 2013, Hawkins played restricted for most of the season but still topped the goal kicking list and, in 2013 and 2014, we had a cobbled-together ruck division.
Where will the goals come from in 2015? What areas can we improve on, to increase our output?
We're doing OK at getting the ball inside 50- we've been champions at doing this well over the past 8 years, being either the best or 2nd best team getting the ball inside 50 for 6 of these 8 years. Last year, we dropped to 6th. That needs to improve this season.
How do we compare with other teams at converting our shots on goal into 6 points? Our accuracy has been reasonable over the past 8 years apart from 2009 and 2012, when we were 9th most accurate, and 2014 when we were the 15th most accurate team - or perhaps I should say we were the 4th least accurate team.
View attachment 105004
If we intend to keep wasting our shots on goal, then we need to increase our I50s so we can have more kicks in the direction of the big posts. If that's too difficult due to lack of manpower in the rucks, midfield, etc.- then we will just have to learn to be a lot cleverer and more economical with setting up our goal kickers so they aren't just peppering the goals and stop wasting the opportunities that their teammates have given them. Hawthorn improved their goal accuracy by 3% last season- there's no reason that we can't improve ours by that amount.
We need to be more accurate with our entries and our targets need to be in better position to receive, so that means the ball has to come in faster, before the opposition defence has time to set up 2 on 1 on a goal kicker- and we need to put a clever player or two (like Stokes, Bartel or Johnson) in the area, so they can get to the fall of the ball or direct a young fast teammate to be in the right place. Motlop would be handy here, too, with his speed. I'm sure there will be 20 players capable of rotating through here.
Enright's done it a bit. Josh Hunt, Milburn...One thing I have noticed, between 07 and 11 we had a lot of defenders running forward and kicking goals. Mackie and Wojo would do it regularly as well as our midfielders in Bartel and Ablett kicking them from 50. (trying to think of what other defenders used to run forward and kick goals? Scarlo used to do it, but I think he did it more 04 - 06)
We will end up losing one of walker, kersten and I'd prefer them both over stanley & clark