- Aug 2, 2007
- 6,192
- 5,354
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Packers, Bulls, Ducks, Angels
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In that case I don't see a need for anyone to spend more than $30 a night max.
Maybe you're not a big drinker.
Sort of on what you guys are talking about, I don't get people who bash Iggy Azalea, Taylor Swift, Nicki Minaj, etc., or say that today's music is bad.
Admittedly, I'm a bit of a musical snob, scoffing at those who don't think Aeroplane Over the Sea is one of the 90s best albums or those who can't recognise Pete Townshend's genius in the potential mess The Who's sound could have been if he played any other way. You know, I care about stupid s**t like that.
But even so, I recognise the importance of people like Swift and Azalea. It's to make catchy pop hits, and is that such a bad thing? I'm not embarrassed to say that if Taylor Swift's 'Shake It Off' comes on the radio, I'll sing along. Why? Because it's bloody catchy. The only reason Swift, Minaj and co. get the blame for today's music being bad is because people have short/selective memories. When reminiscing about the music of the 80s, people talk about U2 and Queen while forgetting about the likes of Nelson or Rick Astley. And the 90s? For every Song 2 there was a Baby One More Time. For every Loser there was a Everybody (Backstreet's Back). Some of the music from the past 50 years has been absolute dogshit and it's hardly become worse. But when you focus on people like Taylor Swift and Nicki Minaj and say that they've ruined music, you've already forgotten that bands like The White Stripes, Foo Fighters and the Arctic Monkeys kicked arse during the 2000s, and the latter two are still going.
My point is that every decade has it's bad music, but it's never ruined music. Swift, Azalea and Minaj have a purpose and if people keep buying and listening to their (admittedly catchy) music, they're doing it right. There's still a lot of good bands out there for the rest of us to listen to, and buying their music will do more to help the state of music than whining about the bad ones.
Do not find that photo attractive at all.
The obsession of Taylor Swift a lot of straight (seemingly anyway) young males have
Very odd
Not even a looker. She's ok I guess
Also the common perception is that she is some type of angel when if you go through her boyfriends (all 2444243 of them) it's clear she's ridden the utensil carousel a few times
(early days Britney plz)
Do not get either.
Music is trash - admittedly a bit of a looker but give me the teen poop sloots of my youth anyday - (early days Britney plz)
I like the numbers 9 and 19 for football reasons (ie: favourite player's over the years), doesn't mean I am going to get the same numbers tattooed on myself
What the *. I agree that obsession with pop stars is a bit weird and pointless since they're all very samey to me. But *, Taylor Swift not a very good looking person? You're taking the piss.Not even a looker. She's ok I guess
Taylor Swift is stunning
I don't understand her body. As in, I don't understand how it's f*cking possible to have that good a body. She's like the end game for female bodies. It's like, you can't get any better naturally.
Borderline anorexic, no ass = 'cant get any better'? She is gorgeous but her body isn't what is attractive about her.I don't understand her body. As in, I don't understand how it's f*cking possible to have that good a body. She's like the end game for female bodies. It's like, you can't get any better naturally.
Sort of on what you guys are talking about, I don't get people who bash Iggy Azalea, Taylor Swift, Nicki Minaj, etc., or say that today's music is bad.
Srs brah? Not saying her body isn't bangin', because it is, but I think that's a bit far. For me her sexiness is all about her eyes and lips.
Borderline anorexic, no ass = 'cant get any better'? She is gorgeous but her body isn't what is attractive about her.