Witts has more upside he is still learning the game better size as wellI would Trade Witts before I would trade Grundy.
Grundy has the Bigger Upside then Witts
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Witts has more upside he is still learning the game better size as wellI would Trade Witts before I would trade Grundy.
Grundy has the Bigger Upside then Witts
give us broomhead
Witts has more upside he is still learning the game better size as well
Give us Wingardgive us broomhead
Just because I rate Witts higher does not mean we should trade one nowWell Let’s Trade Grundy then to a SA Side at end of the Year then and Maybe Kennedy will go with him too
I wouldn't trade either, would play both in 2015 and relegate White to a depth option. Pick up Jon Griffin or Jonathan Giles for a second/third rounder or a state leaguer as ruck depth..
Just because I rate Witts higher does not mean we should trade one now
Keep Gault and DwyerDelist: Clarke, gault, mooney, Armstrong, lynch, Dwyer, yagmoor
Trade: blair, keeffe
I would Trade Witts before I would trade Grundy.
Grundy has the Bigger Upside then Witts
I am thinking O’Rourke could be a better get then Frawley
We really need more Tall Mids. We just have Pendles who is 185cm +
O’Rourke is 188cm and I think he be the Bigger get then Frawley as we have Marsh and Moore coming in
Up For Trade: Fasalo, Young, Blair, Dwyer, Brown
Because Cox was so much better at the same age! http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/...id1=100&tid2=5&pid2=3701&type=A&fid1=O&fid2=OI would be keen to get a ruckman actually a stronger and older body helping out Grundy. It will allow us to get rid of Witts, Witts makes Fraser look like Dean Cox at his prime.
Basically what we need is a ruckman, running defenders that can use the ball well and a Luke Ball replacement, he doesn't have to be a big name player just a mid 20's midfielder who can help out Adams and Beams. I don't think Josh Thomas is the man for that and I would put Adams ahead of him especially from the improvement I have seen from Taylor in the past few weeks. He looks better and better and his disposal will improve hopefully but even if he doesn't, it's not like Swan or Ball were ever great users of the ball. His job is to tackle, get clearances and the hard ball gets for our running mids.
I wish Malceski was a few years younger, would have fit that whole in the back line along with Shazza perfectly.
OK this brings me to a pertinent point. 2009 and 2010 drafts are looking more and more like flops.
Thomas, Sinclair, Fasolo and Seedsman is all we have and all four are struggling or injured, big time.
As for recent drafts we have done outstandingly well.
from 2011 I have two guys Witts and Elliott inside the top 15 players from that draft and then Adams and Williams from anywhere from 16-30.
2011 basically equals four picks inside 30 in Hindsight.
2012 we did really well. Not including Martin, Dwyer or Oxley but including Frost early days I know
But I'd have four guys in the top 20.
As for 2013 we had picks 6 and 10 who we haven't even seen and Langdon would easily go top 20.
So to break it down 2011 equals four guys inside the top 30 two perhaps in the top ten.
2012 four players inside the top 20 and maybe over there careers some or all in a pipe dream could go top ten.
2013, three guys inside the top 20. I reckon Langdon would go top 20 in hindsight.
So as far as list management we've made the hard decisions and we should be tracking well. If we can nail the 2014 draft and Darcy Moor is all that he's cracked up to be then we are seriously going places.
Is your point that higher draft picks are better than lower ones...?