Still a pretty poor skill error.
Heinous.
When I said it wasn't a dangerous kick, I was emphasising the error, not excusing it. An AFL footballer should never, ever, ever be missing that target.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Still a pretty poor skill error.
To be fair, I was responding to KE's post suggesting that our selectors had to be brain damaged for not having him in our best 22 players, when the fact is that he's not in our best 28. Suggesting that it is KE himself who is brain damaged would be grounds for an infraction on the grounds of personal abuse...
I don't agree with every decision that the selectors made this year. I thought they held onto both Mackay and Porplyzia for far too long before they were finally relegated to the SANFL.
But when it comes to the youngsters, the selectors have a far better idea of what they are and are not capable of - and how they're coping with the AFL games that they are playing (and Lyons coped particularly badly due to his lack of fitness).
I see his strengths. I also see his deficiencies, which appear destined to limit his AFL career - a lack of pace, a lack of fitness and downright ordinary disposal by foot. Those are career terminal failings. I also acknowledge that his lack of fitness meant that he struggled to recover from the AFL games he did play - something which his fanbois refuse to believe or acknowledge. His strengths are such that he'll always star at state league level, but when the pace of the game goes up (as in the AFL), his failings are exposed.
He's not the messiah, he's just a naughty little boy.
It's ok, it's not in writing.That cannot be possible, Lyons is a contracted player and that would be a massive breach.
Lyons will dominate on swooping on the loose ball, if he gets his disposal right he will become damaging as an outside mid with some goal sence
That cannot be possible, Lyons is a contracted player and that would be a massive breach.
Yep. Apparently Melbourne has offered him a three year deal. It has not, as yet, been denied by the club or his agent.
The issue is Priddis and Cross were/are ONLY inside midfielders. They have absolutely no value anywhere else on the field, be that moving forward briefly, having a run on the wing, or dropping back, due to a lack of kicking or marking skills. Just look at the WC board to see how quickly the fans have turned against Priddis. Not being able to at least pinch hit elsewhere severely limits a midfielder's longevity nowadays, unless they are a bonafide superstar at that position. As soon as Priddis and Cross dropped off the slightest bit on their play, people turned against them rapidly.Fitness is one area that can definitely be improved with enough work. Plenty of footballers can make it with a lack of pace and lack of kicking skills (Cross/Priddis) (don't think he has the worst kick). He may not turn out to be a star but I can see him becoming a solid 150 gamer if he gets the opportunities. Has very clean hands in close, composure under pressure, and can get the pill. If he gets fit enough for AFL he will be a strong enough player as long as he plays to his strengths.
weve had a lyon not a lyonsDidn't alto s Dad play for Melbourne?
To be fair, I was responding to KE's post suggesting that our selectors had to be brain damaged for not having him in our best 22 players, when the fact is that he's not in our best 28. Suggesting that it is KE himself who is brain damaged would be grounds for an infraction on the grounds of personal abuse...
I don't agree with every decision that the selectors made this year. I thought they held onto both Mackay and Porplyzia for far too long before they were finally relegated to the SANFL.
But when it comes to the youngsters, the selectors have a far better idea of what they are and are not capable of - and how they're coping with the AFL games that they are playing (and Lyons coped particularly badly due to his lack of fitness).
I see his strengths. I also see his deficiencies, which appear destined to limit his AFL career - a lack of pace, a lack of fitness and downright ordinary disposal by foot. Those are career terminal failings. I also acknowledge that his lack of fitness meant that he struggled to recover from the AFL games he did play - something which his fanbois refuse to believe or acknowledge. His strengths are such that he'll always star at state league level, but when the pace of the game goes up (as in the AFL), his failings are exposed.
He's not the messiah, he's just a naughty little boy.
Yep.And if we didn't have at least 28 better players on our team list.
He's not as good as you think he is. And the selectors have a far better idea of his abilities and deficiencies than you.
weve had a lyon not a lyons
weve had a lyon not a lyons
pretty funny then coz his son barracked for saints lolHis old man is Marty, played 27 games for Melbourne in the mid-70s.
http://stats.rleague.com/afl/stats/players/M/Marty_Lyons.html
My point is though both of these players have had long careers and are definitely more than "state level players".The issue is Priddis and Cross were/are ONLY inside midfielders. They have absolutely no value anywhere else on the field, be that moving forward briefly, having a run on the wing, or dropping back, due to a lack of kicking or marking skills. Just look at the WC board to see how quickly the fans have turned against Priddis. Not being able to at least pinch hit elsewhere severely limits a midfielder's longevity nowadays, unless they are a bonafide superstar at that position. As soon as Priddis and Cross dropped off the slightest bit on their play, people turned against them rapidly.
While fitness is obviously something that can be improved, it is a bit of a worry that after 3 preseasons his fitness is still not anywhere near what it should be. Without knowing what exactly goes on in the coaching box, I'd wager that his fitness is a major reason that he wasn't in the team for much of the year.
Kicking is a really, really important thing for Lyons to improve on. If you're an inside midfielder with little pace, it isn't the end of the world, provided you can at least dispose of it solidly when you do get it outside. You're right in saying Lyons isn't the worst kick, but his kicking is loopy, and not overly accurate. Getting his kicking to at least an average level would be a major part of him thriving at an AFL level.
Don't get me wrong, I think he could be a very solid AFL player, and was unlucky not to get more games, I just think that people are overreacting when they think that our selectors were insane for not playing him more.
I see his strengths. I also see his deficiencies, which appear destined to limit his AFL career - a lack of pace, a lack of fitness and downright ordinary disposal by foot. Those are career terminal failings. I also acknowledge that his lack of fitness meant that he struggled to recover from the AFL games he did play - something which his fanbois refuse to believe or acknowledge. His strengths are such that he'll always star at state league level, but when the pace of the game goes up (as in the AFL), his failings are exposed.
He's not the messiah, he's just a naughty little boy.
Lyons always has been and always will be an INSIDE player my friend. This won't change due to his lack of speed. Would be like trialling Thommo / Luke Ball as an outside player. ie. dumb.
Sounds awesome, where can I get some of your stuff?So Lyons to dees for a pick in the 20's .
Vince to a vic club (not necessarily dees) also for a pick in the late teens early 20's.
Polec to adelaide for wright.
What are people's thoughts on this?
thankgod someone else is thinking thisSounds awesome, where can I get some of your stuff?
Pets got a job while he was the best player available in that position. Once his form dropped away and they found other alternatives he started getting selected less often.Yep.
That's why they keep picking Petrenko, right? And gave Jaensch and Martin multi year deals?
So Lyons to dees for a pick in the 20's .
Vince to a vic club (not necessarily dees) also for a pick in the late teens early 20's.
Polec to adelaide for wright.
What are people's thoughts on this?
Lyons = daylight robbery on Adelaide's behalfSo Lyons to dees for a pick in the 20's .
Vince to a vic club (not necessarily dees) also for a pick in the late teens early 20's.
Polec to adelaide for wright.
What are people's thoughts on this?
So Lyons to dees for a pick in the 20's .
Vince to a vic club (not necessarily dees) also for a pick in the late teens early 20's.
Polec to adelaide for wright.
What are people's thoughts on this?