PaddyO
Cancelled
Would the selectors be comfortable with a bowling attack of-
Johnson
Starc
Faulkner
Marsh
Maxwell
Plus Smith and Clarke?
Johnson
Starc
Faulkner
Marsh
Maxwell
Plus Smith and Clarke?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

If Clarke replaces Watson (or Bailey) from the current line up, who does Faulkner replace when fit?
Not Marsh imo.
Would the selectors be comfortable with a bowling attack of-
Johnson
Starc
Faulkner
Marsh
Maxwell
Plus Smith and Clarke?
My opinion on Finch has changed a bit. I went to the game yesterday. He should've been dismissed early, but capitalized. Good on him. Once he gets going, he's very good.Unless Smith or Clarke roll there arm over that means we must get 10 overs out of both of Maxwell and Marsh. I'd prefer we play Faulkner over Bailey and push the batting order up.
Good to see you coming around re Finch, there is only so long you can ignore good stats, hope a few of your mates come around soon too.
He just needs to play offside more early on and he is set. Other than slips (where everyone goes out to) he is often out at mid on.My opinion on Finch has changed a bit. I went to the game yesterday. He should've been dismissed early, but capitalized. Good on him. Once he gets going, he's very good.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He gets caught driving on the up a lot as well as nicking. He hits the ball in the air heaps more than most batsmaN, it's his advantage and disadvantage at times.He just needs to play offside more early on and he is set. Other than slips (where everyone goes out to) he is often out at mid on.
Would the selectors be comfortable with a bowling attack of-
Johnson
Starc
Faulkner
Marsh
Maxwell
Plus Smith and Clarke?
So..... The attack should be?I would hope they aren't
So..... The attack should be?
He gets caught driving on the up a lot as well as nicking. He hits the ball in the air heaps more than most batsmaN, it's his advantage and disadvantage at times.
Or cummins if he's bowling 150
With Johnson and Starc in the team why pick the inferior bowler just because of pace?
Is hazelwood better?
Line ball for mine.Is hazelwood better?
Line ball for mine.
Hazelwood is the better bowler now, but Cummins has the greater scope IMO due to his raw pace. I personally think Cummins is some way off and is getting a gig for experience
You surely don't pick people for a WC just for experience, they obviously think he can do the job the best if when gets a game.
Absolutely agree.Well yeah but the world cup is now.
Would the selectors be comfortable with a bowling attack of-
Johnson
Starc
Faulkner
Marsh
Maxwell
Plus Smith and Clarke?
I doubt it. I think you need at least one of Hazelwood or Cummins.
I do hope Cummins gets a game at some point. I hate to think of him as 12th man for the whole series when he could have been getting some more cricket under his belt in Shield matches.
Cricket Australia probably have decided that he can't play first class cricket this year
Or cummins if he's bowling 150
Hazelwood is the better bowler now, but Cummins has the greater scope IMO due to his raw pace. I personally think Cummins is some way off and is getting a gig for experience
He surely wasn't picked on merit