No Oppo Supporters Re-signing Tex, Danger and Sloane *** Crows Only ***

[jenny61_99]

If it's not a new purchase, then it wouldn't be a sign.

But if he's renting or renovating it probably has a sign.

 

[gothecrows]

I'd put Wingard ahead of Betts. But I have both safely ahead of Cyril.

I'm pretty sure the Player Ratings doesn't reset at the beginning of each year though. It continues using stats from previous years.

That page is listing points gained from games this year only. I really have no idea why their rating system has Rioli so high (sure, he should be relatively high up, but not near Betts/Wingard). It's almost as if their formula is along the lines of:

rating = decode(surname, 'Rioli', 1.5, 1) * rating

 

[TexForPM]

Out of interest, do you believe that "the deductibility of costs associating with investing in an income-producing asset" should be abolished on all investments, or just housing?

If you want people to buy and invest in property then don't abolish if you don't want them to then abolish

 

[Allefgib]

That page is listing points gained from games this year only. I really have no idea why their rating system has Rioli so high (sure, he should be relatively high up, but not near Betts/Wingard). It's almost as if their formula is along the lines of:

rating = decode(surname, 'Rioli', 1.5, 1) * rating

The system measures impact of each action on the field a player is involved with.

Kicking sideways in the back 50 gets you negligible gains.

Winning a contest in f50 and setting up a team for goal, or goaling yourself, gets you tons of points.

 

[TexForPM]

The system measures impact of each action on the field a player is involved with.

Kicking sideways in the back 50 gets you negligible gains.

Winning a contest in f50 and setting up a team for goal, or goaling yourself, gets you tons of points.

Cyril has a ridiculously high goal to possession ratio. Meaning when and if he touches it good things happen for hawks

 

[dogs105]

If you want people to buy and invest in property then don't abolish if you don't want them to then abolish

I don't want them to do it subsidised by the taxpayer.

Out of interest, do you believe that "the deductibility of costs associating with investing in an income-producing asset" should be abolished on all investments, or just housing?

Maybe not business loans - margin loans for shares, yes.

 

[MattyB_76]

If you want people to buy and invest in property then don't abolish if you don't want them to then abolish

Get rid of it or don't, people will still invest in property, rents will just go up.

 

[TexForPM]

Get rid of it or don't, people will still invest in property, rents will just go up.

I rent because I don't want long term responsibility.
Rent won't go up if less people rent

 

[dogs105]

Get rid of it or don't, people will still invest in property, rents will just go up.

Modelling has shown this to be false. It is widely quoted due to misinterpreting what happened in the Sydney market when it was stopped in the 80s.

 

[Captain Morgan]

Why would you possibly think that?

Interesting that multiple studies have shown that left voters tend to be more intelligent than those from the right.

Intelligent or academically qualified ?

Pot smoking hippies on the left want to shut the country down and live off good vibrations in nimbin, let every refugee in the world in.

Redneck conservatives on the right build a wall around Australia and demand everyone conform to their way of life.

Same shit different smell

 

[TGFC]

Get rid of it or don't, people will still invest in property, rents will just go up.

very few will, the number of investment properties will reduce, the house prices will then be at their actual value, rather than the inflated value that the tax breaks bring. meaning less will need to rent (they can now afford their own house). rent prices will not go up as demand will reduce for a rental property, meaning it will cycle down.

 

[MattyB_76]

I rent because I don't want long term responsibility.
Rent won't go up if less people rent

Getting rid of NG won't see investors immediately sell their properties and have them snapped up by Owner Occupiers.

Investors will keep their properties, for the capital gains, and rents will go up because investors will no longer be happy making a loss.

The Income Tax increase to the Govt will probably be returned to low income earners in a form of rent assistance.
Net benefit for the Govt = 0. Net benefit for the public = 0.

 

[dogs105]

Intelligent or academically qualified ?

Actually both, according to various reports.

I am not sure which side drinks more rum though, Cap'.

 

[Captain Morgan]

Let's just make GST 15% and claim CGT for IPs and be done with it.

 

[dogs105]

Let's just make GST 15% and claim CGT for IPs and be done with it.

I'd rather raise Income Tax than the GST.

 

[TexForPM]

Getting rid of NG won't see investors immediately sell their properties and have them snapped up by Owner Occupiers.

Investors will keep their properties, for the capital gains, and rents will go up because investors will no longer be happy making a loss.

The Income Tax increase to the Govt will probably be returned to low income earners in a form of rent assistance.
Net benefit for the Govt = 0. Net benefit for the public = 0.

You see it all the time. Investments won't go up when people will look elsewhere for affordability.
When no ones paying rent for 1-2 months investors re-think their percentage of profit. Simples.

 

[Rory Walkerfield]

I'd rather raise Income Tax than the GST.

How? Half of each incremental dollar I earn goes in tax as it is! Blood out of a stone.

 

[TGFC]

Getting rid of NG won't see investors immediately sell their properties and have them snapped up by Owner Occupiers.

Investors will keep their properties, for the capital gains, and rents will go up because investors will no longer be happy making a loss.

The Income Tax increase to the Govt will probably be returned to low income earners in a form of rent assistance.
Net benefit for the Govt = 0. Net benefit for the public = 0.

there wont be any capital gains because no new investors will enter the market. rents wont go up, rental tenants will hit a threshold that when rents equal the cost of loan repayments, due to some jumping out early, then the whole industry that is investment properties dies. it will happen quickly, akin to ripping off a band aid.

 

[TGFC]

People who want the thread to stay on topic = 0, TGFC = 1

 

[dogs105]

How? Half of each incremental dollar I earn goes in tax as it is! Blood out of a stone.

That's great for you (seriously) - you are earning more than $180,000 pa. It's just that for people on lower incomes, GST increases hurt them more in proportion than for those on higher incomes.

I think it would be good to have a tax system similar to some Scandinavian countries - and also with their education, health, and public support systems.

Also,

 

[Freddy Bassett]

Let's just make GST 15% and claim CGT for IPs and be done with it.

Let's not raise GST!

As for Danger, I am over him...
He is a champion player but he can go...
Obviously puts himself above our great club...
Won't even commit to us for probably a million a year cause it is such a burden being the biggest superstar in Adelaide...

Lets not sugar coat it any more... He is leaving, our coach got murdered but even that wasn't enough for him to commit.

I just hope our club matches Danger for ruthlessness on the trade table and we do him NO favours...

Rant over

 

[Freddy Bassett]

That's great for you (seriously) - you are earning more than $180,000 pa. It's just that for people on lower incomes, GST increases hurt them more in proportion than for those on higher incomes.

I think it would be good to have a tax system similar to some Scandinavian countries - and also with their education, health, and public support systems.

Also,

I like your views!

I am heading over to Edinburgh in November for 2 months, any tips of where to go?

 

[Wood_Duck]

If you want people to buy and invest in property then don't abolish if you don't want them to then abolish

Yes. If you want a complete collapse of the real estate, building and banking industry, go for it.

 

[TexForPM]

Yes. If you want a complete collapse of the real estate, building and banking industry, go for it.

Im not saying wither way. I was just stating if you want investments keep if you dont abolish it...

 

[TGFC]

That's great for you (seriously) - you are earning more than $180,000 pa. It's just that for people on lower incomes, GST increases hurt them more in proportion than for those on higher incomes.

I think it would be good to have a tax system similar to some Scandinavian countries - and also with their education, health, and public support systems.

Also,

ah ha education, lets expect people to pay huge amounts of money just for a piece of paper that gives a person a better chance at teaching others (teaching). How in the world can we expect all vital services to pay for their own education and still get the best people doing it.