Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Id be OK with Collins at 11 if we get a good slider with 8. If anything, his chemistry with Weitering should mean we lock in our two key defenders for the next 10-12 years in one draft.
Ideally for mine we'd go:
1. Weitering
2. Curnow
3. Collins
4. Best available mid
5. SOS
Ill be dissapointed if we take Burton at any pick before 19. Dont wanna waste picks on very risky prospects. We just traded away a South Australian forward with question marks over his knee.
I am warming to him. Much better tank than Watson. Bottom ager so you would hope there is further improvement (even if he looks 28). Stingrays coach was a massive wrap for him on the radio this morning (a real Micky Turner style pump up) and due to my low sales resistance I would be happy to use 11 on him.I'm not all too keen on Collins. He's not bad but I think we have other needs to address. I don't see him as best available at 11 either.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Says Callum Twomey,Got a feeling there will at least one pick out of left field (relatively) in the top 10
Seeing both Towmey and Anderson tip Curnow to us has got me incredibly excited by it. I had never contemplated him as I thought he would be easily gone. If only Melbourne could pass up on Weideman then we can go 8 Weideman 11 Curnow
1. Weitering
8. Weideman
11. Curnow
19. Burton/Gresham/Hibberd
One can dream, but going by the latest phantoms, we only really need Dees to "trump" us and take McKay at their pick 7.SOS would be very happy with himself should that be available.................the smile would be too much![]()
weitering & collins would build a defence for the next decade
buckley collins plowman
byrne weitering docherty
plus sheehan tuohy smith dvr dick. lots of potential
Would be a long term strategy, not opossed to it, but jezzz we want to be patient
Swap McKay for Curnow.1. Jacob Weitering
8. Kieran Collins
11. Harry McKay
19. Clayton Oliver
Not sure why people are so keen on this?
This is exactly what people were thinking when we drafted Watson and McCarthy in 2010.
Just because they played juniors together doesn't really mean they'll translate to an awesome partnership in the AFL and Weitering will form a good partnership with whoever else we have.
Would hate the idea of using 2 top 19 picks on 2 KPD's, simply due to historical evidence that a lot of good KPD's in the AFL can be found at later picks and traded for cheaply, where as the gun forwards and mids are often high draft picks and cost a fortune at the trade table.
Its also not necessarily a good thing to have your FB and CHB the exact same age/draft.
Same. The talent manager was on SEN this morning and he couldn't have spoken any higher of them.id be happy with that
Why is averaging so low in possessions? If he's a "great mover" and a " great mark" should be averaging more than that. Plus his disposal efficiency is very poor, but I've seen nothing of him to have my own thoughts.McKay is exactly the type we need to draft.
Casboult is best as your stay at home full forward whereas McKay is really just an amazing athlete for his size. Much like Lynch of the Suns he's a good mover and a great mark. Plus the Crows seem super keen at 9 so best we take the forward without any injury issues/arrests while we can.
Will have to get used to pronouncing it 'McKye' though
I'd say because he's still a bit new on the development scale. You're paying for potential here.Why is averaging so low in possessions? If he's a "great mover" and a " great mark" should be averaging more than that. Plus his disposal efficiency is very poor, but I've seen nothing of him to have my own thoughts.
Not sure why people are so keen on this?
This is exactly what people were thinking when we drafted Watson and McCarthy in 2010.
Just because they played juniors together doesn't really mean they'll translate to an awesome partnership in the AFL and Weitering will form a good partnership with whoever else we have.
Would hate the idea of using 2 top 19 picks on 2 KPD's, simply due to historical evidence that a lot of good KPD's in the AFL can be found at later picks and traded for cheaply, where as the gun forwards and mids are often high draft picks and cost a fortune at the trade table.
Its also not necessarily a good thing to have your FB and CHB the exact same age/draft.
This times 100Not sure why people are so keen on this?
This is exactly what people were thinking when we drafted Watson and McCarthy in 2010.
Just because they played juniors together doesn't really mean they'll translate to an awesome partnership in the AFL and Weitering will form a good partnership with whoever else we have.
Would hate the idea of using 2 top 19 picks on 2 KPD's, simply due to historical evidence that a lot of good KPD's in the AFL can be found at later picks and traded for cheaply, where as the gun forwards and mids are often high draft picks and cost a fortune at the trade table.
Its also not necessarily a good thing to have your FB and CHB the exact same age/draft.
McKay first, then you guys take Milera and we takr Curnow.It appears you may have the choice at #8 of Milera, Curnow or McKay ......what's the concensus of who you think the club will take of those 3?