- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
- Posts
- 4,251
- Reaction score
- 6,620
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, Ozark Mountain Daredevils
That was because Chapman and Trigg were more interested in saving their own skins than any damage to the club, hence the hiring of QC's to argue the case. When Chapman was asked why we got such heavy penalties his reply was that the AFL wanted more - they wanted sackings! He couldn't have cared less about draft sanctions.Put the fine aside for a minute ......the Crows penalties were more severe than Essendon's .....that is laughable![]()
For once Vlad was right, they should have got sackings.



not my understanding of events ?
that Dank took liberties and told lies. Hird has played it pretty bad though and ended up being the face of this.


