The fact they did respond shows that they arent as bad as some say.
The quality of that game was very very good.
Just makes our win even more impressive.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact they did respond shows that they arent as bad as some say.
The quality of that game was very very good.
Anyone understand why the stand is called the Brownlow stand?
Just makes our win even more impressive.
Not everything is about us. You need to learn that
Umpires working hard to get a Geelong win here.
and they got it in the end. Seems if you were a bulldogs player tonight 2016 htb rules applied where as geelong got the 2017 "knocked out" play on treatment.
and they got it in the end. Seems if you were a bulldogs player tonight 2016 htb rules applied where as geelong got the 2017 "knocked out" play on treatment.
I'm not one that usually buys in to umpire influence, but I agree with that. It's the one sided home crowd factor, just like Perth and Adelaide.
No wonder the Cats want more games down there
We really need to all turn up to Etihad against interstate teams to get the umpire home ground advantage.
Umpires influence games they dont intend too but it happens every week. Mostly its like you said the hometown crowd influencing them sometimes its just their incompetence.
We actually got a good run against the cats last week but it was consistent with the 2017 no holding the ball decision unless beyond obvious mantra they have but I thought a lot of 50/50 calls went our way for once.
We really need to all turn up to Etihad against interstate teams to get the umpire home ground advantage.
So he made a good point?Bruce is like Bulldogs haven't scored to the left all night.
Well derrr Bruce when they didn't score anything in the 2nd quarter and nothing yet in the 4th w.ft do you think?
Lol yeah it's actually still noteworthy.So he made a good point?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Accurate, but perhaps redundant. But then pretty much all commentary is redundant so long as you can see the TV anyway.So he made a good point?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Accurate, but perhaps redundant. But then pretty much all commentary is redundant so long as you can see the TV anyway.
Are you daring to have a dig at Basil Zempilas?Sometimes calling the players names is great.
It's even better when they call the right name.
It's the one thing I'll say in defence of McAvaney - he's one of the few who actually knows who he's looking at.
Yeah haha. I remember one game where Conor McKenna was called everything under the sun except "McKenna". O'Conor, McConor, O'Kenna even. And I'm not talking about last week when there was an Irish O'Conor playing for Geelong It was last year sometime.Sometimes calling the players names is great.
It's even better when they call the right name.
It's the one thing I'll say in defence of McAvaney - he's one of the few who actually knows who he's looking at.
Yep, at times people defend them by saying 'oh so they don't remember the names of all 600 players', but the thing is a lot of footy fans would have greater knowledge of players and be able to name most players they see - and this is the commentators' job, literally, and it wouldn't take them that much effort or time to recognise each player. WTF are they doing during the week when this is their job and they've doing it for years? The AFL and the TV stations should really demand higher standards. Most of them don't give a s**t about and don't understand footy, they just get involved because it's an easy career path as an ex player and following footy is what blokes do, even if they don't comprehend it. It's why I think flawed pundits like Dermott Brereton and Mark Robinson who at least genuinely care about footy deserve less flak.Yeah haha. I remember one game where Conor McKenna was called everything under the sun except "McKenna". O'Conor, McConor, O'Kenna even. And I'm not talking about last week when there was an Irish O'Conor playing for Geelong It was last year sometime.
If there's one thing about professional commentators, it's that they actually have to be halfway decent to get and keep their jobs. If there are issues with that then I'm blaming the producers, who seem to be actively encouraging the boys club in the channel 7 commentary box.
Surely ducked his neck to get an arm that highSelwood with the class! Grabbed a girl out of the crowd to take a photo with
You make some good points. Despite being a bit of a knob Mark Robinson definitely has enormous passion for the game and knows his footy.Yep, at times people defend them by saying 'oh so they don't remember the names of all 600 players', but the thing is a lot of footy fans would have greater knowledge of players and be able to name most players they see - and this is the commentators' job, literally, and it wouldn't take them that much effort or time to recognise each player. WTF are they doing during the week when this is their job and they've doing it for years? The AFL and the TV stations should really demand higher standards. Most of them don't give a s**t about and don't understand footy, they just get involved because it's an easy career path as an ex player and following footy is what blokes do, even if they don't comprehend it. It's why I think flawed pundits like Dermott Brereton and Mark Robinson who at least genuinely care about footy deserve less flak.