We're doing our bit. Extra time and a kick after the siren.
2005: +4, -4
2006: -1, +1
2007: -3, extra time (-19)
2011: +3
2013: -13
2017: extra time (+2)
So long as we don't get North we keep it interesting.
2015 much?
+40 +40 -60?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We're doing our bit. Extra time and a kick after the siren.
2005: +4, -4
2006: -1, +1
2007: -3, extra time (-19)
2011: +3
2013: -13
2017: extra time (+2)
So long as we don't get North we keep it interesting.
And give teams the best opportunity to play their best 22 is what Gil has said as that provides the best footy for the fans.No it was meant to stop mass restings by finals bound teams in round 23
You are confused.Sometimes games aren't close. Amazingly this happens even when sides don't have a week off. In what way has the bye caused the games to be one sided? Why weren't they one sided last year when there was also a bye?
But the bye has affected the results.After an anomalous 2016 finals series we're back to normal - only the top four in the prelim.
The only thing keeping me interested is how the sides who had this weekend off hold up next weekend.
If Richmond wins he flag I suppose it'll be a bit of fun but it's a massive letdown so far after a pretty interesting season.
1 good one was enough for the counter argument floated by the AFL.One bad finals series, one good one and you're basing your opinion off that?
....
I understand your thinking, but it really wasn't.**** you guys.
Last night was great!
Worst year of footy in my lifetime
Never been so unitersted in finals in my life and that has nothin to do with the dogs. Seen far more finals series with us not involved than us in and this one I couldn't care less about
If the Giants make the GF be the first one I have absolutely no desire to watch