Remove this Banner Ad

Oppo Camp Non Eagles Discussion thread - 2017 edition (continued in Part 2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter avishka5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The counter argument is he's 23, an AA player, was pick 5, and has had a down year due to off field stuff. No reason he can't bounce back.

Also, **** essendon.
Quoting previous draft position is moot. Watts was pick 1 and is practically worthless. Rory Sloane was pick 44 and has higher value than both Watts and Stringer. FWIW I think Stringer is probably worth 11, when packaged with the Dogs' 2nd or 3rd round pick.
 
Quoting previous draft position is moot. Watts was pick 1 and is practically worthless. Rory Sloane was pick 44 and has higher value than both Watts and Stringer. FWIW I think Stringer is probably worth 11, when packaged with the Dogs' 2nd or 3rd round pick.
But In General he's lived up to where he was picked. Even a down year saw him having three shots at goal a game. He's a decent player, if overhyped by bt and others at time.

No need for dogs to get bent over. Would certainly not be offering him and second rounder for pick 11
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Quoting previous draft position is moot. Watts was pick 1 and is practically worthless. Rory Sloane was pick 44 and has higher value than both Watts and Stringer. FWIW I think Stringer is probably worth 11, when packaged with the Dogs' 2nd or 3rd round pick.
Stringer is not worth a pinch of duck **** :)
 
No need for dogs to get bent over.
Except Beveridge's statements. He seems quite happy to bail on the player which undermines Stringer's trade value a little.

Stringer and a pick for 11. That pick ends up at GC for Saad. Dunno what Essendon do for Smith. Future first?
 
Depends on which stringer you get. Is he going to be able to turn things around and become that damaging burst forward that saw him win AA selection or is he going to continue on his downward spiral into obscurity

The fact the bulldogs have basically given up on him indicates to me that have doubts he can make the necessary changes.

As a foil to Daniher rather than the main focal point he is potentially very dangerous so for pick 11 it's a worthwhile risk for Essendon. But Dodo at the bombers has a well earned reputation for being difficult to deal with so it'll likely take some time to get that deal done
 
Except Beveridge's statements. He seems quite happy to bail on the player which undermines Stringer's trade value a little.

Stringer and a pick for 11. That pick ends up at GC for Saad. Dunno what Essendon do for Smith. Future first?
Saad and Stringer combined are worth more than pick 11
 
Adelaide now looking at motlop . Not a bad cameron replacement .

From trade radio
Cameron to brisbane for 18
18 to essendon for aaron Francis
18 to dogs for stringer

Adelaide could lose cameron get a replacement (motlop) for free and pocket a highly rated youngster . Good outcome for the crows
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What about two squirts of goats piss?

I have never closed a web browser at work more quickly than after typing "drink piss gif" into google image.

Next time "Bear grylls gif" might be the safer option.
 
Adelaide now looking at motlop . Not a bad cameron replacement .

From trade radio
Cameron to brisbane for 18
18 to essendon for aaron Francis
18 to dogs for stringer

Adelaide could lose cameron get a replacement (motlop) for free and pocket a highly rated youngster . Good outcome for the crows
In what world is Francis worth as much as Stringer, contracted or not.
 
In a world where Stringer burns through 6 figures of cash gambling.
According to a bitter ex. He’ll get back to quality footy. On the other hand Francis hasn’t shown much yet and is quite fat.
 
So the person who came up with the trade should discount that because you do?
This is an online forum where we share our personal perspectives, no?

I’d rate Francis as more a late second early third.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yes but you asked a question, got an answer and dismissed it for a vaguely sexist reason. I think you can expect a bit of a blunt response after that.
Sexist? Wtf?

A bitter ex from either gender can make slanderous accusations. Doesn’t make them the most reliable source of info.
 
So Lever requests a trade home though still contracted and gets told very publicly to not attend the end of season function, Charlie Cameron requests a trade home though still contracted and is told no probs come along mate.
Just gonna ask the question....could it be to do with R ?? (can of worms!)
 
So Lever requests a trade home though still contracted and gets told very publicly to not attend the end of season function, Charlie Cameron requests a trade home though still contracted and is told no probs come along mate.
Just gonna ask the question....could it be to do with R ?? (can of worms!)
Lever is uncontracted
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom