catempire
Hall of Famer
Yep. Still a very handy player. At times I wished we had him (as dirty as that made me feel).Can you remember him impacting games this year?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Yep. Still a very handy player. At times I wished we had him (as dirty as that made me feel).Can you remember him impacting games this year?
Just hurry up and give it to us so we can try to wheel and deal our 35 and 41 into something kewl.
In the brownlow he had the 5th highest votes per game for the entire league.
Yes, but West Coast weren't dealing with Hitler's Nazi Germany.Sam mitchell gets plenty of brownlow votes and was traded for a late pick.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The people spruiking Ablett's BnF win from 14 games haven't worked out that this says more about how shit the GC list is than it does about Ablett's brilliance.
In the brownlow he had the 5th highest votes per game for the entire league.
lolWhat Lang worth and is he any good? The last player u gave us has we worried
Yes, but West Coast weren't dealing with Hitler's Nazi Germany.
What Lang worth and is he any good? The last player u gave us has we worried
What Lang worth and is he any good? The last player u gave us has we worried
What Lang worth and is he any good? The last player u gave us has we worried
Ablett was also 4th in the coaches votes after round 17 despite having missed a couple of games already at that point (he only played 1 more game).
http://m.afl.com.au/news/2017-07-17/aflca-votes-round-17-dusty-misses-out-on-maximum-votes
So, you like the Cats huh?Also glade 2e has been great as cats a team I like
He’s no Billie Smedts, that’s for sure.What Lang worth and is he any good? The last player u gave us has we worried
)As much as I like it I think it may be slight overs.IF blues get 10 and 16 I think I saw....
How about Lang and 21 for 16....
We keep 19 and get 16.
So
16, 19, 35 and 51.
Go Catters
Again, I'm not saying he didn't play well.
I just think it's a disgrace that no one else in the rest of the team could get more votes in an entire season.
It's the club BnF! They HAVE to give votes to players every match. It's not like the brownlow where the opposition might get the votes.
No Sun's player was consistently good enough relative to their team mates to get the points.
Again, I'm not saying he didn't play well.
I just think it's a disgrace that no one else in the rest of the team could get more votes in an entire season.
It's the club BnF! They HAVE to give votes to players every match. It's not like the brownlow where the opposition might get the votes.
No Sun's player was consistently good enough relative to their team mates to get the points.
From Sunbury on his profile too

Despite being in a team that was regularly losing and finished bottom two, he was getting coaches votes. So he was considered to be one of the better players when compared to members of the losing team and the winning team on the day.I'm not sure they do have to give votes every week. Wiki seems to suggest the coaches can just not give votes if they want. Anyway I just saw he won with 126 votes with second place on 104. That's a crazy margin for such a short season from him. I guess then going 6-8 with him in the team and 0-12 without him would have something to do with that.


