No, both players are in the same boat.
Both RFAs.
Both offered significant coin to leave their club.
Amazing all North supporters were arguing there is no reason their club would be offering up draft picks for Dusty a few months ago.
Now they think the situation will be completely different for Tom Lynch?
As North fans reminded me a few months ago, if a player decides to leave in free agency, the rules say you can match, but clubs realistically don’t want to pay a player significant overs who doesn’t want to be there.
Free agency is a s**t system but that’s how it works.
North wouldn't have traded for dusty games ben his age. But we would have been paying that for Kelly. Every situation is different and when u have potentially three clubs desperate for lynch matching an offer and forcing a trade or keeping lynch might be the best thing for the Gold Coast.
Better than getting a young kid that might up and leave in 2 years like just about every good kid they have drafted has.