- Joined
- Sep 13, 2000
- Posts
- 86,851
- Reaction score
- 42,960
- Location
- Melbourne cricket ground. Australia
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Horks
- Thread starter
- #76
How has this not been counted as a clanger yet ?
review downgraded to rushed behind
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

How has this not been counted as a clanger yet ?
Seems no video is emerging of the ni hao incident. That could have been a 100 metre penalty with video, but without it's not so much of anything.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
And nothing she said was anti-semitic, she simply expressed a view about Israel politics and how it affects the Palestinians
It's not something that anyone will remember come election day, but it's a clanger in the very traditional sense... although given the batshit crazy clangers we get these days, such as Dutton yesterday, this is very run of the mill.
In the pantheon of election gaffes, this one is pretty tame - at best, a rushed behind.
Still, extra lols because of the person who made the gaffe. How's those $4 interns working out Tone?
In the pantheon of election gaffes, this one is pretty tame - at best, a rushed behind.
Still, extra lols because of the person who made the gaffe. How's those $4 interns working out Tone?
Freudian slip, no doubt.
Post them here. I don't think theres been one yet (11am Thu 11th)
Kicking off with some own goals and rushed behinds
Dutton opponent disibility affair -rushed behind
Scomo $328 billion accusation from treasury, or was it. -own goal
ALP candidate resigns over semitism ism. -own goal
Three LNP candidates with sect 44 issue -rushed behind
Rules being made up as we go along
(Clangers is a bit vague. Think of own goals as a 50 against to the goal square)
(Reserving the right not to be totally on time posting scores)
(limited to campaign stuff only - go elsewhere for policy - that would require analysis)
I'm confused on 2 fronts...
1) With the way you are scoring, do you want a high score a low score? So with the ALP currently leading, am I right in thinking that it's the LNP who've made more gaffes?
2) How is Parke a goal, but Dutton just a behind? Dutton's was far worse - his will be talked about and remembered until election day. No one will remember Parke by next weekend.
I'm confused on 2 fronts...
1) With the way you are scoring, do you want a high score a low score? So with the ALP currently leading, am I right in thinking that it's the LNP who've made more gaffes?
2) How is Parke a goal, but Dutton just a behind? Dutton's was far worse - his will be talked about and remembered until election day. No one will remember Parke by next weekend.
Coalition looking like 2018 Carlton so far.
Dutton doubling down on being an ableist bully, Morrison bloviating about Labor racism and then having his own racist gaffe, 3 Liberal candidates withdrawing for likely being in violation of the constitution and finally this:

She should had been a Senate candidate, not a candidate for a seat full of high wealth business people that will never come close to being in ALP handsDon't see why Melissa Parke quit.
I don't get the scoring system
