- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Posts
- 16,350
- Reaction score
- 33,202
- Location
- Footscray
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Sunderland,Pelicans, LA Kings
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

There's no way I wanted to part with ×2 1st rounders in a million years ..Interesting. I coped so much shit at the time when I said I didnt want him [emoji848]
I dont think that word ever applied. He played well in a potentially brilliant midfield is closer to the mark. I never could see how he was going to lift us as much as some were saying. It was nothing more than a mature body from a decent side we wanted. Who as a supporter could have guessed we would get that in Walsh. Well I guess SOS did thank heavens.I’ll be honest with you Soap I wanted him because he looked brilliant in that GWS midfield but not for 2 firsts. Then seeing him live today was very very disappointing he’s one of those give and go blokes that gets 400 touches hanballing sideways then getting it back then putting on Danihers head and giving him no chance. Not what we needed.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Get rid of taggers and tacklers that are content not to play in front would be better. Penalise the constant tackles laid before a player actually has the ball. Reward the player that goes in and gets it and give them time to dispose. Much better idea. Based on the fundamental aim of the game.Get rid of the prior opportunity rule. Been saying it for years.
If you are tackled and don’t dispose of the ball with a kick or handball, bad luck, holding the ball.
Would get rid of 90% of the stoppages around the ground, and open the game up.
Which is what the AFL wants......isn’t it![]()
Get rid of the prior opportunity rule. Been saying it for years.
If you are tackled and don’t dispose of the ball with a kick or handball, bad luck, holding the ball.
Would get rid of 90% of the stoppages around the ground, and open the game up.
Which is what the AFL wants......isn’t it![]()
Get rid of taggers and tacklers that are content not to play in front would be better. Penalise the constant tackles laid before a player actually has the ball. Reward the player that goes in and gets it and give them time to dispose. Much better idea. Based on the fundamental aim of the game.
Didn’t stop us back in the day.Wouldn’t it mean that players would be reluctant to attack the ball and take first possession?
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Didn’t stop us back in the day.
The good players got the ball and disposed of it, or balked, did the old blind turns etc, etc
Will be watching escalators all around the place to see how fast you go up 'em......I'm known for that.

There's no way I wanted to part with ×2 1st rounders in a million years ..
Next years first ..yes ..but nothing else
weight of numbers?How did Shiel get a vote in the ANZAC Day medal?!?!!!
Reading the Filth and * boards is extremely entertaining at the moment.
Obviously us guys are a much better brand of supporter because we have learnt the humility of losing again and again and again.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Don’t rely on it however you have my word that I’ll show some class and humility.Gee Shiel seemed to have some poor disposals when the game was on the line
I just hope when our time does come we do show some class & humility......if this had of been our team supporters booing the hell out of a player who had got BOG I would be extremely embarrassed.
I don't know why Pendlebury was booed. He really is a champion and deserved the medal. Couldn't work it out, but my missus said she thought it was because of his staging. (There was a free kick given to him. He threw his head back when he was tackled head on. He really emphasised the throwing back of the head IMO and got the free kick. It was at a vital stage I think in *'s backline.) You know, it really pisses me off that the only players that can win this medal are from Collingwood and *.![]()