I find it quite intriguing how your algorithm has a completely different perspective on the tigers in comparison to the squiggle. The squiggle says we are 4th on aggregate and has pretty much held us in the upper group all season long, bar a few brief mid table moments. Your algorithm had us wayy down there last week, and still has us mid pack, a long way off the pace.Sydney v Essendon +23
Western Bulldogs +3 v Brisbane
Carlton v Collingwood +40
Gold Coast +6 v Melbourne
St Kilda +2 v West Coast
Port Adelaide v Adelaide +6
North Melbourne v Geelong +34
Hawthorn v GWS +18
Fremantle +24 v Richmond
4/9. Running total 42/72
1. Geelong 25.7
2. Collingwood 19.7
3. Adelaide 11.0 (+1)
4. GWS 8.8 (-1)
5. Essendon 4.3 (+1)
6. West Coast 3.4 (+1)
7. Port Adelaide 2.3 (+1)
8. Fremantle 2.2 (-3)
9. Richmond 1.4 (+3)
10. Hawthorn 1.3 (+4)
11. Western Bulldogs -0.1 (-1)
12. Brisbane -2.6 (-3)
13. North Melbourne -4.5
14. St Kilda -7.6 (-3)
15. Carlton -12.4 (+2)
16. Sydney -13.5 (+2)
17. Melbourne -14.0 (-1)
18. Gold Coast -18.2 (-3)
West Coast +26 v Melbourne
Collingwood +27 v St Kilda
Brisbane v Adelaide +4
Geelong +26 v Western Bulldogs
Essendon +11 v Fremantle
North Melbourne +14 v Sydney
Port Adelaide +31 v Gold Coast
Richmond +1 v Hawthorn (almost tips a tie)
GWS +26 v Carlton
I'm not saying one's clearly more accurate - 42 tips clearly shows the power of the algorithm and is well above the average tipster this year (well, according to footytips, that is). Just interesting the different rankings that two tools can have - and both still have similar performances!