So the sum total of Bangladesh touring overseas and stinking it up for over twenty years is two tons from their opening batsman in a test series they lost by plenty? FMD I'm having a hard time trying to reconcile your posts. I think you're trolling tbh
If you're not trolling, for someone so forgiving of crap teams playing crap cricket ad neaseum you don't share much of those niceties towards your fellow posters.
Niceties?
What are we the CWA?
For some unknown reason you seem to take it really personally that someone has a different view. If I disagree with someone I’ll argue till I’m blue in the face about it but at the end of the day it isn’t like it’s an insult for someone to disagree.
Again, I’ve given a legitimate example of how players improve and achieve by playing good opposition.
The subtotal of your rebuttal is usually ‘that’s your argument?’ rather than anything of any real substance. I’d find it a lot easier to respect your views if you simply provided some common sense example based evidence.
The fact is, playing better opposition makes better players.
You seem to think that if a side doesn’t go from zero to winning everywhere they play within a couple of years, that equates to no improvement. Or that it’s a failure.
It’s not.
Aside from the two countries who started the game, it has taken everyone decades to become competitive in international cricket.