Getting excited pre season is usually a recipe for disappointment, but I have to say it one thing that excites me is that if one or two guys don't come up there are able replacements who I wouldn't be unhappy about getting a gig.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tend to agree with it all. A strong team but unfortunately for a few of the young guys will have to keep waiting. Adams probably under the most pressure, Birch arguably not fit enough based on GC trial. If Hawkes played tall forward line does Payne come in?Pretty much agree with that although I maybe could see Witherden and Answerth being a close decision. That backline is still the biggest question on its makeup
Actually I now doubt if too many of the promising young guys will get a chance in the Marsh Series. That is such a shame not to give Ballenden, Ely Smith Payne and co some exposure at a higher level. Even half a game would be beneficial. From what Fages has said it appears older players (who are part of the best 22-24) will be selected for the two trial games to get match fitness into them for the start of the AFL. Stating the obvious but appears to be result driven rather than investing some game time into the young guys. If we get injuries, we could be in some trouble because we are relying upon promising young guys who haven't had any exposure to AFL level footy.Tend to agree with it all. A strong team but unfortunately for a few of the young guys will have to keep waiting. Adams probably under the most pressure, Birch arguably not fit enough based on GC trial. If Hawkes played tall forward line does Payne come in?
Some of the young boys will get their chance throughout the year.Actually I now doubt if too many of the promising young guys will get a chance in the Marsh Series. That is such a shame not to give Ballenden, Ely Smith Payne and co some exposure at a higher level. Even half a game would be beneficial. From what Fages has said it appears older players (who are part of the best 22-24) will be selected for the two trial games to get match fitness into them for the start of the AFL. Stating the obvious but appears to be result driven rather than investing some game time into the young guys. If we get injuries, we could be in some trouble because we are relying upon promising young guys who haven't had any exposure to AFL level footy.
Fagan seem big on players earning their spot . I remember going to the footy as a kid and you'd see guys play 3 or 4 years in the reserves before they'd get a crack . Only 18 games . Only 18 players with 2 on the bench who mightn't get a run. Less injuries , and someone who played your position had to go out for you to get a spot. Guys like Brian Taylor were kicking 8 and 9 in the twos and still not getting a game. And 12 teams.Some of the young boys will get their chance throughout the year.
It’s up to them to play well when they get those chances and hold their spot.
That’s what makes a good team.
A position we haven’t been in for a long time.Fagan seem big on players earning their spot . I remember going to the footy as a kid and you'd see guys play 3 or 4 years in the reserves before they'd get a crack . Only 18 games . Only 18 players with 2 on the bench who mightn't get a run. Less injuries , and someone who played your position had to go out for you to get a spot. Guys like Brian Taylor were kicking 8 and 9 in the twos and still not getting a game. And 12 teams.
I must say once people got a chance they were ready ,more seasoned and better for it.
With 5 guys playing in the Bush Fire game, a couple of the young guys will get a game.Actually I now doubt if too many of the promising young guys will get a chance in the Marsh Series. That is such a shame not to give Ballenden, Ely Smith Payne and co some exposure at a higher level. Even half a game would be beneficial. From what Fages has said it appears older players (who are part of the best 22-24) will be selected for the two trial games to get match fitness into them for the start of the AFL. Stating the obvious but appears to be result driven rather than investing some game time into the young guys. If we get injuries, we could be in some trouble because we are relying upon promising young guys who haven't had any exposure to AFL level footy.
In principle do agree about earning spots but you would think Marsh Series would be an opportunity to give some of the promising young guys some game time. Have to remember the reserve comp you are referring to would have been stronger than the current NEAFL that our young guys play in, and because of that level of the NEAFL not sure they are ready to jump to AFL level when required. Also by all reports Ballenden played well last week in the trial and some of the comments regarding Payne and the match simulations which I have watched deserve to be recognised.Fagan seem big on players earning their spot . I remember going to the footy as a kid and you'd see guys play 3 or 4 years in the reserves before they'd get a crack . Only 18 games . Only 18 players with 2 on the bench who mightn't get a run. Less injuries , and someone who played your position had to go out for you to get a spot. Guys like Brian Taylor were kicking 8 and 9 in the twos and still not getting a game. And 12 teams.
I must say once people got a chance they were ready ,more seasoned and better for it.
Sydney have never seemed to have any problem developing their players through the NEAFL?In principle do agree about earning spots but you would think Marsh Series would be an opportunity to give some of the promising young guys some game time. Have to remember the reserve comp you are referring to would have been stronger than the current NEAFL that our young guys play in, and because of that level of the NEAFL not sure they are ready to jump to AFL level when required. Also by all reports Ballenden played well last week in the trial and some of the comments regarding Payne and the match simulations which I have watched deserve to be recognised.
Not sure on that as the last couple of years some of the Swans older players have missed extended periods and could be argued that through injuries to those older players some of the Swans promising youth got opportunities, sooner than expected. Having watched every Lions NEAFL and AFL game last year the standard of the opposition in the NEAFL was mediocre and way below AFL level. My point is that pre season trials are a good opportunity to expose some of the promising youth, and I am glad to see Connor and Ely getting a chance and would have liked to have seen a few more eg Starc and Payne.Sydney have never seemed to have any problem developing their players through the NEAFL?
The boys, who the Coaching staff believe are ready, will get opportunity.
Those you mentioned may still get a g o this weekend but if not based on Fagans comments I'd expect Payne and Starc to be the two more that come in to make 24 over the 2 gamesNot sure on that as the last couple of years some of the Swans older players have missed extended periods and could be argued that through injuries to those older players some of the Swans promising youth got opportunities, sooner than expected. Having watched every Lions NEAFL and AFL game last year the standard of the opposition in the NEAFL was mediocre and way below AFL level. My point is that pre season trials are a good opportunity to expose some of the promising youth, and I am glad to see Connor and Ely getting a chance and would have liked to have seen a few more eg Starc and Payne.
Not discounting what **** said, I think you will find the second Marsh game will see a few more 'possibles' playing. Allowing the senior locks to freshen up. You would think those that did the majority of preseason sessions and were in the best 22 last year are a) fit enough and b) know the game plan. The only caveat would be where **** thinks those locks need to build connections with new likely's I'd say.Not sure on that as the last couple of years some of the Swans older players have missed extended periods and could be argued that through injuries to those older players some of the Swans promising youth got opportunities, sooner than expected. Having watched every Lions NEAFL and AFL game last year the standard of the opposition in the NEAFL was mediocre and way below AFL level. My point is that pre season trials are a good opportunity to expose some of the promising youth, and I am glad to see Connor and Ely getting a chance and would have liked to have seen a few more eg Starc and Payne.
There's 2 weeks between game 2 of the Marsh series and the first round of the season.Not discounting what **** said, I think you will find the second Marsh game will see a few more 'possibles' playing. Allowing the senior locks to freshen up. You would think those that did the majority of preseason sessions and were in the best 22 last year are a) fit enough and b) know the game plan. The only caveat would be where **** thinks those locks need to build connections with new likely's I'd say.
I am interested to see what Payne and Skinner do, youd have to think they are not pushing out Adams and Mcstay but as the season goes they may add something i hope.I’d go with
B: Gardiner Andrews Answerth
HB: Rich Adams Ah Chee
C: Robinson Neale Berry
HF: Zorko Hipwood Bailey
F: Cameron McStay Rayner
R: Martin Lyons McCluggage
Bench: McInerney, Witherden, CEY, McCarthy
I think the bolds are locks and underlined are shaky.
Need Answerth as a lock down small back to free up Rich, Witherden and Ah Chee
I think our gameplan relies on 2 rucks so Oscar gets a game.
I think CEY is required as midfield depth
One last crack
Gardiner, Payne, Witherden
Answerth, Andrews, Rich
Thats our best back 6 i think. Best long term too. I still have faith in Witherden at this stage. Payne is the future, just get him in there. Give him a role, a job on someone, im sure he can handle the game as well as Adams. His size frees Andrews up, to float, intercept, move the ball fwd.
McCluggage, Neale, Robbo
Stef, Lyons, Berry
No better group in the comp, lock them in every week.
Zorko, Hippwood, McCarthy
Charlie, McStay, Rayner
Haven't really seen anyone stand up here to force any changes.
Big O, AhChee, CEY, Bailey
Ah Chee has a lot to learn in the half back role. He will be given that opportunity from the bench. Come on, be given a role, instructions, he will be learning on the job. He also has the versatility to slot in on the wing or fwd. worth persisting with for long tern benifits. CEY gets first crack at the big bodied mid bench spot. Zorko, Rayner, Bailey rotating thru the midfield, his protection and def pressure must be good. Bailey gets that last bench spot just ahead of Bundy. His decision making and def pressure need to be very good to keep him there.
Id be pretty happy with that 22 kicking off the season. Pressure on a few players but thats good (withers, cey, mcstay eg). Birchall will need to show a bit more fitness/endurance wise in the last preseason and an intraclub match to crack the team i think. Adams, Matho, Bundy, Starcevich, Skinner, Cox also waiting in the wings for their chance.
Not too many changes to last year, i think fages likes that, building playing rapore, teamwork. Just enough changes to offer a bit more versatility, run, some different options.
Im with ya, i love the pressure bundy brings at his best and he usually bobs up with a cpl of goals. He may not be there fitness wise yet. They will stick with Ah Chee, gotta get that work into him as early as possible. If he is to become the halfback speed etc, they need to start game 1. If he has footy smarts he should pick it up, i am expecting many positional errors in defense to start with. Worth the investment at this stage.I like it! I'd prefer to have Bundy in over ah chee until ah chee can prove some form in the seconds but yeah, I reckon that's pretty close to our best squad
Im with ya, i love the pressure bundy brings at his best and he usually bobs up with a cpl of goals. He may not be there fitness wise yet. They will stick with Ah Chee, gotta get that work into him as early as possible. If he is to become the halfback speed etc, they need to start game 1. If he has footy smarts he should pick it up, i am expecting many positional errors in defense to start with. Worth the investment at this stage.
Yes I think Fages likes a stable side but I believe young blokes Skinner, Starc, etc will be given opportunities this year. I would love to see Payne there and agree with your comments, I had him as my 'smokey' for round 1, but not being picked in last weeks Marsh series against Port I think they are looking for experience for the MCG in round 1. I suppose IF he gets picked for the Carlton trial game and goes well he is a chance.One last crack
Gardiner, Payne, Witherden
Answerth, Andrews, Rich
Thats our best back 6 i think. Best long term too. I still have faith in Witherden at this stage. Payne is the future, just get him in there. Give him a role, a job on someone, im sure he can handle the game as well as Adams. His size frees Andrews up, to float, intercept, move the ball fwd.
McCluggage, Neale, Robbo
Stef, Lyons, Berry
No better group in the comp, lock them in every week.
Zorko, Hippwood, McCarthy
Charlie, McStay, Rayner
Haven't really seen anyone stand up here to force any changes.
Big O, AhChee, CEY, Bailey
Ah Chee has a lot to learn in the half back role. He will be given that opportunity from the bench. Come on, be given a role, instructions, he will be learning on the job. He also has the versatility to slot in on the wing or fwd. worth persisting with for long tern benifits. CEY gets first crack at the big bodied mid bench spot. Zorko, Rayner, Bailey rotating thru the midfield, his protection and def pressure must be good. Bailey gets that last bench spot just ahead of Bundy. His decision making and def pressure need to be very good to keep him there.
Id be pretty happy with that 22 kicking off the season. Pressure on a few players but thats good (withers, cey, mcstay eg). Birchall will need to show a bit more fitness/endurance wise in the last preseason and an intraclub match to crack the team i think. Adams, Matho, Bundy, Starcevich, Skinner, Cox also waiting in the wings for their chance.
Not too many changes to last year, i think fages likes that, building playing rapore, teamwork. Just enough changes to offer a bit more versatility, run, some different options.
I would have thought you'd raise bigger questions about how we have the AA small forward and a 30+ goal key forward who is still very much on the young side, yet are still ranked second worst.We have the number 1 ranked midfield and are ranked 17th for forward lines.