au.sports.yahoo.com
No, I don't think anyone will because it didn't happen like that.
Never heard this one before, swingers now.
Claims of 'wife-sharing' slur add to Adelaide Crows scandal
More dark details from the Adelaide Crows' infamous pre-season camp have emerged.
That is a statement saying ASADA won't appeal WADA.No, ASADA only got involved due to the AFL's judiciary's failure to get close to the right answer. Had the AFL not manufactured their result, there'd have been no need for WADA to get involved. The AFL had an obligation under its ASADA agreement to attempt to get his right. The AFL process was meant to punish the players if found guilty. It did not do that, so ASADA handballed to WADA.
Yeah, sorry I misread that.
I thought they didn’t have any jurisdiction over this camp?
SafeWork SA is poised to probe the notorious pre-season camp that caused fractures within the Adelaide Crows
South Australia’s workplace regulator is poised to investigate the Adelaide Crows’ notorious 2018 Gold Coast pre-season camp.
Paul Starick, Chief Reporter, The Advertiser
July 21, 2020 4:22pm
Workplace regulator SafeWork SA is poised to launch an investigation into the Adelaide Football Club’s infamous 2018 pre-season training camp, raising the potential for prosecutions, a fine and safety order.
An official investigation would focus on “safe systems of work” at the Gold Coast camp, about which Premier Steven Marshall expressed “genuine concerns” following reports of players being put through traumatic activities aimed at building resilience.
The SA workplace health and safety regulator’s role does not extend to Queensland but its jurisdiction may extend to work activities conducted there by the Adelaide-based AFL club.
Responding to reports about Crows players at the camp being told to hurl abuse at a teammate about a childhood trauma, Mr Marshall on July 6 said “everybody who goes to any work environment should be safe from bullying or intimidation” and vowed to check whether the Crows were subject to SafeWork SA legislation.
The camp is widely believed to have played a key role in triggering the club’s collapse from 2017 grand finalists to their current dire position – winless on the foot of the AFL ladder.
Adelaide Crows players walk from the ground during the round 7 match against St Kilda at Adelaide Oval on Monday night. Picture: Daniel Kalisz/Getty Images
Asked on Tuesday about the status of any inquiry by SafeWork SA into the Crows, a spokeswoman for the regulator responded with a written statement.
“No notifications or complaints against the Adelaide Football Club in relation to their pre-season camp in 2018 have been received by SafeWork SA. SafeWork SA is looking into the matter and no further information can be shared at this stage,” the statement says.
“SafeWork SA does not have jurisdiction over Queensland businesses, however, where South Australian businesses operate interstate, we may have jurisdiction over activities relating to safe systems of work.”
According to SafeWork SA’s website, the regulator’s compliance and enforcement activities, in general, may lead to prosecutions being filed in the SA Employment Tribunal and the Magistrates Court, or an enforceable undertaking or expiation notice being issued.
News Corp last week revealed serious doubts had been raised over the independence of the AFL probe into the camp, which cleared the club of wrongdoing, despite revelations of disturbing mental, physical and cultural abuse.
It was revealed seven of the nine Crows’ directors were appointed by the AFL and that the league had sole voting rights of all matters at annual general meetings other than the election of the two remaining board members.
Former Crows coach Don Pyke has said Crows chiefs need to address the notorious four-day camp “once and for all”, arguing the club needed to explain the “context” around some of the activities.
“It’s probably disappointing it’s continuing to be … discussed. I mean clearly, the club’s viewpoint is that they want to move on,” Mr Pyke told ABC radio, following the fresh News Corp investigation into the saga.
“I think it’s probably a conversation that’s due with the club about, well, how they want to address this once and for all.”
Top Adelaide lawyer Greg Griffin has said the AFL made a “serious error” in claiming its investigation into the Crows’ camp was independent, saying it controlled the board and, therefore, the club.
Flying as one? Crows players during the match against St Kilda on Monday night. Picture: Daniel Kalisz/Getty Images
Under the terms of the Crows’ constitution – revised six years ago – the AFL took effective control of the Adelaide board and became the club’s ultimate authority.
The AFL integrity unit in 2018 cleared the Crows of any wrongdoing in the “cult-like” team-building camp and concluded that there had been “no breach of industry rules”.
If SafeWork SA have time to look at this 2 years after the event and in the middle of a pandemic, the SA government needs to look at the head count in SafeWork SA. They obviously do not have enough work on hand.SafeWork SA is poised to probe the notorious pre-season camp that caused fractures within the Adelaide Crows
South Australia’s workplace regulator is poised to investigate the Adelaide Crows’ notorious 2018 Gold Coast pre-season camp.
Paul Starick, Chief Reporter, The Advertiser
July 21, 2020 4:22pm
Workplace regulator SafeWork SA is poised to launch an investigation into the Adelaide Football Club’s infamous 2018 pre-season training camp, raising the potential for prosecutions, a fine and safety order.
An official investigation would focus on “safe systems of work” at the Gold Coast camp, about which Premier Steven Marshall expressed “genuine concerns” following reports of players being put through traumatic activities aimed at building resilience.
The SA workplace health and safety regulator’s role does not extend to Queensland but its jurisdiction may extend to work activities conducted there by the Adelaide-based AFL club.
Responding to reports about Crows players at the camp being told to hurl abuse at a teammate about a childhood trauma, Mr Marshall on July 6 said “everybody who goes to any work environment should be safe from bullying or intimidation” and vowed to check whether the Crows were subject to SafeWork SA legislation.
The camp is widely believed to have played a key role in triggering the club’s collapse from 2017 grand finalists to their current dire position – winless on the foot of the AFL ladder.
Adelaide Crows players walk from the ground during the round 7 match against St Kilda at Adelaide Oval on Monday night. Picture: Daniel Kalisz/Getty Images
Asked on Tuesday about the status of any inquiry by SafeWork SA into the Crows, a spokeswoman for the regulator responded with a written statement.
“No notifications or complaints against the Adelaide Football Club in relation to their pre-season camp in 2018 have been received by SafeWork SA. SafeWork SA is looking into the matter and no further information can be shared at this stage,” the statement says.
“SafeWork SA does not have jurisdiction over Queensland businesses, however, where South Australian businesses operate interstate, we may have jurisdiction over activities relating to safe systems of work.”
According to SafeWork SA’s website, the regulator’s compliance and enforcement activities, in general, may lead to prosecutions being filed in the SA Employment Tribunal and the Magistrates Court, or an enforceable undertaking or expiation notice being issued.
News Corp last week revealed serious doubts had been raised over the independence of the AFL probe into the camp, which cleared the club of wrongdoing, despite revelations of disturbing mental, physical and cultural abuse.
It was revealed seven of the nine Crows’ directors were appointed by the AFL and that the league had sole voting rights of all matters at annual general meetings other than the election of the two remaining board members.
Former Crows coach Don Pyke has said Crows chiefs need to address the notorious four-day camp “once and for all”, arguing the club needed to explain the “context” around some of the activities.
“It’s probably disappointing it’s continuing to be … discussed. I mean clearly, the club’s viewpoint is that they want to move on,” Mr Pyke told ABC radio, following the fresh News Corp investigation into the saga.
“I think it’s probably a conversation that’s due with the club about, well, how they want to address this once and for all.”
Top Adelaide lawyer Greg Griffin has said the AFL made a “serious error” in claiming its investigation into the Crows’ camp was independent, saying it controlled the board and, therefore, the club.
Flying as one? Crows players during the match against St Kilda on Monday night. Picture: Daniel Kalisz/Getty Images
Under the terms of the Crows’ constitution – revised six years ago – the AFL took effective control of the Adelaide board and became the club’s ultimate authority.
The AFL integrity unit in 2018 cleared the Crows of any wrongdoing in the “cult-like” team-building camp and concluded that there had been “no breach of industry rules”.
SafeWork SA is poised to probe the notorious pre-season camp that caused fractures within the Adelaide Crows
South Australia’s workplace regulator is poised to investigate the Adelaide Crows’ notorious 2018 Gold Coast pre-season camp.
Paul Starick, Chief Reporter, The Advertiser
July 21, 2020 4:22pm
Workplace regulator SafeWork SA is poised to launch an investigation into the Adelaide Football Club’s infamous 2018 pre-season training camp, raising the potential for prosecutions, a fine and safety order.
An official investigation would focus on “safe systems of work” at the Gold Coast camp, about which Premier Steven Marshall expressed “genuine concerns” following reports of players being put through traumatic activities aimed at building resilience.
The SA workplace health and safety regulator’s role does not extend to Queensland but its jurisdiction may extend to work activities conducted there by the Adelaide-based AFL club.
Responding to reports about Crows players at the camp being told to hurl abuse at a teammate about a childhood trauma, Mr Marshall on July 6 said “everybody who goes to any work environment should be safe from bullying or intimidation” and vowed to check whether the Crows were subject to SafeWork SA legislation.
The camp is widely believed to have played a key role in triggering the club’s collapse from 2017 grand finalists to their current dire position – winless on the foot of the AFL ladder.
Adelaide Crows players walk from the ground during the round 7 match against St Kilda at Adelaide Oval on Monday night. Picture: Daniel Kalisz/Getty Images
Asked on Tuesday about the status of any inquiry by SafeWork SA into the Crows, a spokeswoman for the regulator responded with a written statement.
“No notifications or complaints against the Adelaide Football Club in relation to their pre-season camp in 2018 have been received by SafeWork SA. SafeWork SA is looking into the matter and no further information can be shared at this stage,” the statement says.
“SafeWork SA does not have jurisdiction over Queensland businesses, however, where South Australian businesses operate interstate, we may have jurisdiction over activities relating to safe systems of work.”
According to SafeWork SA’s website, the regulator’s compliance and enforcement activities, in general, may lead to prosecutions being filed in the SA Employment Tribunal and the Magistrates Court, or an enforceable undertaking or expiation notice being issued.
News Corp last week revealed serious doubts had been raised over the independence of the AFL probe into the camp, which cleared the club of wrongdoing, despite revelations of disturbing mental, physical and cultural abuse.
It was revealed seven of the nine Crows’ directors were appointed by the AFL and that the league had sole voting rights of all matters at annual general meetings other than the election of the two remaining board members.
Former Crows coach Don Pyke has said Crows chiefs need to address the notorious four-day camp “once and for all”, arguing the club needed to explain the “context” around some of the activities.
“It’s probably disappointing it’s continuing to be … discussed. I mean clearly, the club’s viewpoint is that they want to move on,” Mr Pyke told ABC radio, following the fresh News Corp investigation into the saga.
“I think it’s probably a conversation that’s due with the club about, well, how they want to address this once and for all.”
Top Adelaide lawyer Greg Griffin has said the AFL made a “serious error” in claiming its investigation into the Crows’ camp was independent, saying it controlled the board and, therefore, the club.
Flying as one? Crows players during the match against St Kilda on Monday night. Picture: Daniel Kalisz/Getty Images
Under the terms of the Crows’ constitution – revised six years ago – the AFL took effective control of the Adelaide board and became the club’s ultimate authority.
The AFL integrity unit in 2018 cleared the Crows of any wrongdoing in the “cult-like” team-building camp and concluded that there had been “no breach of industry rules”.
McGovern did not go to the worst parts of the camp and it’s not the reason he left, ignore whatever shit his manager sprouted. Betts and Sauce wouldn’t be a surprise though.
Didn't both want two year contracts from us and a guarantee to play in the firsts?
Oh yeah I’m not specifically talking about why they actually left, but Eddie seems to be the one feeding these continual articles on the camp so he must still hold some anger towards it.
Betts was still under contract
