- Moderator
- #7,637
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very likely * will come knocking hoping that we rush into a decision. I think we should push for all 3 first rounders or at least 6,7 and a third. If they wanted to deal in good faith, should’ve come to us while picks swaps could be considered. They’re unbearable to deal with during the trade period, see no reason we’d want to make things easy for them.
He runs pretty hard too
I’m a bit worried about Clayton.
He’s a good salesman and a smooth operator in the media, but when he came on board I didn’t think it was in a role with complete oversight over both list management and the recruiting department.
His record really does speak for itself and it’s not a good one.
Brady might have the final say, but he’s not going to overrule Clayton in the draft bunker on particular players. Brady isn’t in the recruiting department anymore.
I really hope Finnegan has the final say as the national recruitment manager, his track record with mid-late picks has been sensational in the last 4 years.
It’s seemed to me Clayton was brought in as a mentor to both Luff and Finnegan who were new to the roles, but he seems to have morphed into a far more powerful position.
I’m a bit worried about Clayton.
He’s a good salesman and a smooth operator in the media, but when he came on board I didn’t think it was in a role with complete oversight over both list management and the recruiting department.
His record really does speak for itself and it’s not a good one.
Brady might have the final say, but he’s not going to overrule Clayton in the draft bunker on particular players. Brady isn’t in the recruiting department anymore.
I really hope Finnegan has the final say as the national recruitment manager, his track record with mid-late picks has been sensational in the last 4 years.
It’s seemed to me Clayton was brought in as a mentor to both Luff and Finnegan who were new to the roles, but he seems to have morphed into a far more powerful position.
I’m a bit worried about Clayton.
He’s a good salesman and a smooth operator in the media, but when he came on board I didn’t think it was in a role with complete oversight over both list management and the recruiting department.
His record really does speak for itself and it’s not a good one.
Brady might have the final say, but he’s not going to overrule Clayton in the draft bunker on particular players. Brady isn’t in the recruiting department anymore.
I really hope Finnegan has the final say as the national recruitment manager, his track record with mid-late picks has been sensational in the last 4 years.
It’s seemed to me Clayton was brought in as a mentor to both Luff and Finnegan who were new to the roles, but he seems to have morphed into a far more powerful position.
If we trade 2 to * i want 6,7,8 and next years 1st. ****'em
The only club I’d consider trading pick 2 to is GC assuming they offer pick 5 and their future firstIf we trade 2 to * i want 6,7,8 and next years 1st. ****'em
Was it a coincidence that the club used footage of both Swans academy players Campbell and Gulden in the Clayton video? Are they dropping a hint?
Gulden is the big surprise for me. Will we bid on him at 11? A smart, neat small forward/mid.If we look into that, then we should assume the Perk is getting picked at 2. His breakaway goal from 50 was the first highlight
Stupid sentiment. I would be happy to have three picks (6,8, 11) for 2 and 11. Three top ten picks ...
Mid or tall is the biggest question.
If the mids next year are as good as the draft watchers reckon, then surely we take a couple of talls?
The recruiting team have mentioned pace a couple of times, leading me to believe that they’ll take quick mids and not the talls id expect.
I think we load up on mids next 2 drafts early picks and try and get lucky with a couple of talls with late picks.
Mid or tall is the biggest question.
If the mids next year are as good as the draft watchers reckon, then surely we take a couple of talls?
The recruiting team have mentioned pace a couple of times, leading me to believe that they’ll take quick mids and not the talls id expect.
I think we load up on mids next 2 drafts early picks and try and get lucky with a couple of talls with late picks.
Gulden is the big surprise for me. Will we bid on him at 11? A smart, neat small forward/mid.
I think I looked this up once and have a slight recollection he was drafted at what would have been our pick if it were a non compromised year?Fwiw Lynch was drafted 1st round not pre-listed.
Agree though, in fact think posted something almost word for word the same a couple of weeks ago.
Was it a coincidence that the club used footage of both Swans academy players Campbell and Gulden in the Clayton video? Are they dropping a hint?
Stupid sentiment. I would be happy to have three picks (6,8, 11) for 2 and 11. Three top ten picks ...
If we look into that, then we should assume the Perk is getting picked at 2. His breakaway goal from 50 was the first highlight
I’m a bit worried about Clayton.
He’s a good salesman and a smooth operator in the media, but when he came on board I didn’t think it was in a role with complete oversight over both list management and the recruiting department.
His record really does speak for itself and it’s not a good one.
Brady might have the final say, but he’s not going to overrule Clayton in the draft bunker on particular players. Brady isn’t in the recruiting department anymore.
I really hope Finnegan has the final say as the national recruitment manager, his track record with mid-late picks has been sensational in the last 4 years.
It’s seemed to me Clayton was brought in as a mentor to both Luff and Finnegan who were new to the roles, but he seems to have morphed into a far more powerful position.
twomey reckons we're a good chance of getting him at our second pick, I think we just have to take that chance.If that Perkins highlight at 0:25 doesn't help you see why there's talk we might take him at 2 then nothing will.
If we go a midfielder at 2 and select Hollands over Perkins I'll be a tad disappointed... before getting over it and backing in the recruiters.
You would hope there isn’t going to be any overruling on draft night. I have confidenceI’m a bit worried about Clayton.
He’s a good salesman and a smooth operator in the media, but when he came on board I didn’t think it was in a role with complete oversight over both list management and the recruiting department.
His record really does speak for itself and it’s not a good one.
Brady might have the final say, but he’s not going to overrule Clayton in the draft bunker on particular players. Brady isn’t in the recruiting department anymore.
I really hope Finnegan has the final say as the national recruitment manager, his track record with mid-late picks has been sensational in the last 4 years.
It’s seemed to me Clayton was brought in as a mentor to both Luff and Finnegan who were new to the roles, but he seems to have morphed into a far more powerful position.