Sure, but if you're the sub, you're not a "walk in".Just think about who clubs name as the sub usually, its some fringe flanker/mid/wing who is generally aged between 18 and 22ish and is inexperienced.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Sure, but if you're the sub, you're not a "walk in".Just think about who clubs name as the sub usually, its some fringe flanker/mid/wing who is generally aged between 18 and 22ish and is inexperienced.
They're managing his season with a view to (hopefully) finals IMO. I expect his midfield minutes will end up similar to 2024, where in the tail end of the year he still did very well against prime aged mids.Even Geelong - with the weakest engine room in the AFL bar perhaps West Coast - isn't playing him in the inside mid role this year. His hamstrings just won't take 65% game time on the inside.
Perhaps, but it is made possible by Geelong's uniquely long expectations of game time played by Blicavs, Jack Henry et al. Most sides tend to spread their minutes more evenly; we tend to cycle our inside midfields extremely aggressively.I expect his midfield minutes will end up similar to 2024, where in the tail end of the year he still did very well against prime aged mids.
Depends, for certain players they can have more impact as the sub than playing a full gameSure, but if you're the sub, you're not a "walk in".
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
To be honest we are all completely guessing unless we could confidently complete this exercise for every single side in the comp. Because you need to understand the bottom third of each sides best 23 as much as your own players.Sure, but if you're the sub, you're not a "walk in".
It's BigFooty. Anything more than uneducated guesswork is UnAustralian.To be honest we are all completely guessing unless we could confidently complete this exercise for every single side in the comp. Because you need to understand the bottom third of each sides best 23 as much as your own players.
Geelong:
Stewart
Cameron
Dangerfield
Humphries
Stengle
Miers
Holmes
Close
Dempsey
Smith
Zac Guthrie
Ollie Henry
Blicavs
J Henry
Define what you mean?? I am not saying all 12 would push out 12 from a side, but each individually would at bare minimum be on the bench or starting 18.No they can’t, mate.
All of them could walk into a number of teams.
Most of them could probably scrape into most teams.
All of them couldn’t make it into all teams.
wouldnt play at pies
Too selfless?Gryan Miers would not make Hawthorns team on principle
Define what you mean?? I am not saying all 12 would push out 12 from a side, but each individually would at bare minimum be on the bench or starting 18.
I am happy to do an exercise with you. Name for me the bottom 4 b23 from each team and who would be in ahead of the names I mentioned
I'll take Soligo, Rachele is borderline for this list.Dawson, Rankine, probably Thilthorpe.
That’s it.
People posting lists of 6+ players have misunderstood the question.
Yeah, but it's when you add the positional constraints for every single side that it gets interesting.the number of players who would be best 23 across the comp
Dawson, Rankine, probably Thilthorpe.
That’s it.
People posting lists of 6+ players have misunderstood the question.
Even taking position and the "walk-in" factors, people are underestimating the numbers.Yeah, but it's when you add the positional constraints for every single side that it gets interesting.
Better than Curnow and McKay, Tex and Thilthorpe, Waterman and Allen, JUH/Darcy/Naughton? Better than GWS and Geelong for small forwards? Better than Brisbane for small defenders and mids?
And it has to be clearly better, for the phrase "walk in".
I'll take Soligo, Rachele is borderline for this list.
I'll give you:Even taking position and the "walk-in" factors, people are underestimating the numbers.
Rachele gets in comfortably on 2025 form
Adelaide players who would make any other team:
Dawson
Rankine
Rachele
Soligo
Thilthorpe
Fogarty
Worrell
Michalany
Hinge
others who would be close are Murray, Neale-Bullen and Keays
2025 IS TWO GAMES OLD.Rachele gets in comfortably on 2025 form
I'll give you:
Dawson
Rankine
Thilthorpe
Michaelanny
Fogarty
Remember it's walk up, not maybe through I biased lens.
And I'm a Crow fan, reckon you have a great team.
2025 IS TWO GAMES OLD.
He'd be on my list for this thread.This is where it can be difficult. He would get in most but would he get in all. As good as he has become not sure if he would get into Hawthorn's especially when you are already adding Stewart
No questions, no conditions... straight in - I'd have thought. Definition hasn't changed.And what does walk up actually mean in real terms?
No questions, no conditions... straight in - I'd have thought. Definition hasn't changed.