PMBangers
@Headless approved!
- Moderator
- #1,226
I think I've gone a bit into this before, and Kinnear Beatson once said a similar thing on a RMC video, but essentially bottom agers will get the treatment of not being picked apart when you're watching games, because we're so focused on which top agers are good enough, how good they are and what their weaknesses are, it's easy to just notice the good things a bottom ager does and get excited.Thanks for the rankings, it’s great to get a bit more analysis on the northern academy players in particular which is often hard on the early part of the season.
Would be interested to know what has changed the view on Sharp over summer/early season from a top 3 pick to outside the top 10. it’s not like his game has changed much or that everyone else has significantly improved. Tough start in the league as a high half forward but his first half in particular in the academy game was excellent and he is still the best contested ball winner in the cohort.
Then they become the focus in their draft year and you go deeper, more critical and they have greater exposure, and pick up on other things; are they working defensively, are they selfish, do they have a poor body language, are they actually using the ball well, etc.
So, and I won't name the player, you get someone like player A coming into this year that won heaps of footy in 2024, played champs in a premium role, had some disposal inconsistency but nothing out the usual for his role. Easy to look at that in the peripheral of last year's class being the focus and get excited, but then on rewatching over the summer and his first couple of games this year he's not a good user, lazy defensively, poor at winning contested footy and sulks a lot on field, going from someone I considered an early top 5 contender to undraftable if the draft was tomorrow. That's not the players fault of course, it was all there to see last year and now he could turn into a "Whatever happened to Player A, was top 10 coming into the year!" (This absolutely isn't Sharp fwiw)
Recruiters are naturally better at filtering out that aspect of watching footy, but I'd say most, if not all, in the amateur draft watching space fall into the same trap
Last edited:




