Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 List Management Discussion - Part 3

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
:stkilda:
2025 List Management Discussion - Part 3

Now that our season is over, and news is starting to break - it's time for a fresh thread.

This thread is to discuss all things list management - trades, draft, free agency, delistings and more.
As we are now officially in our off-season, we'll be wanting to keep this thread more strictly on-topic than the previous iterations.
Be respectful. You are allowed to disagree with someone - but play the ball, not the man. Repeat offenders will have their posting rights revoked.

Thanks to Lore once again for this incredibly useful spreadsheet.

2025 KEY DATES
Free Agency Period:
Friday, October 3rd - Friday, October 10th
Trade Period: Monday, October 6th - Wednesday, October 15th
AFL Draft: Wednesday, November 19th - Thursday, November 20th

See Also:
🔸 2025 Year in Review 🔸 Rumours & Confirmed Movements 🔸 2025 Draft Discussion 🔸

 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I would nearly do Pick 10 for Wilkie and Pick 17 for Marshall (I know they would get pushed back)

If we could turn Wilkie into Flanders and keep our pick 7 and Geelongs first rounder it’s good for our list profile.

Both are contracted so if they weren’t offering their first picks no deal.
Jaysus. Pick 10 for Wilkie. He should hav been in the AA squad again this year. And you'd give him up for pick 10 that might become pick 15. No f******* way.
 
I would nearly do Pick 10 for Wilkie and Pick 17 for Marshall (I know they would get pushed back)

If we could turn Wilkie into Flanders and keep our pick 7 and Geelongs first rounder it’s good for our list profile.

Both are contracted so if they weren’t offering their first picks no deal.
FMD this might be an all time bad call.
 
This makes no sense. In what world would we consider trading Wilkie? Have the Bulldogs lost the plot or is Wilkie more open to a trade than his public statements would have us believe?
I mean it does make sense - Wilkie is one of the best key defenders in the competition, if there's ever a hint of him being open to a move then clubs are gonna jump on

But no, we will not entertain it that's for sure
 
I would nearly do Pick 10 for Wilkie and Pick 17 for Marshall (I know they would get pushed back)

If we could turn Wilkie into Flanders and keep our pick 7 and Geelongs first rounder it’s good for our list profile.

Both are contracted so if they weren’t offering their first picks no deal.
Go back to bed.
 
I mean it does make sense - Wilkie is one of the best key defenders in the competition, if there's ever a hint of him being open to a move then clubs are gonna jump on

But no, we will not entertain it that's for sure
But there is not even a hint of that. As far as we have been told. It's very strange.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I would nearly do Pick 10 for Wilkie and Pick 17 for Marshall (I know they would get pushed back)

If we could turn Wilkie into Flanders and keep our pick 7 and Geelongs first rounder it’s good for our list profile.

Both are contracted so if they weren’t offering their first picks no deal.

If we trade Wilkie we should fold as a club.
 
This makes no sense. In what world would we consider trading Wilkie? Have the Bulldogs lost the plot or is Wilkie more open to a trade than his public statements would have us believe?
Surely one of their past players must’ve fathered a key back.

Best they do another stocktake at the Scragger Stud.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I agree we need to target a player who can play full back to replace Howard. It looks like Caminiti will be moved forward next year, so we will have a heap of 2nd-3rd defenders. We desparately need a 200cm key big bodied key defender who can handle the big power forwards. Jordan Butts from Adelaide is not getting a game might be a good pick up.

Perhaps we have some targetted in the draft?
Man, I'm tired of this opinion and argument - not just from you either.

We don't desperately need a 200cm gorilla to play on power forwards.

Sure, it would be good to have a player good enough at that height, but there is no one attainable from other clubs who are good enough.

There might be one available in the draft, but we have plenty of tall defensive options now.

If we needed a key defender, Jordon Butts (195cm by the way lol) would be a good decent pick-up - but we don't.

You just need defenders who are good enough both individually and as unit.

There are plenty of examples of teams succeeding without a 200cm defender.

Melbourne had Jake Lever (195), Steven May (193) when they won the premiership.

In 2020, Richmond had David Astbury at 195 as their tallest defender.

In 2025, Adelaide's tallest Nick Murray and Butts (195), Hawthorn's tallest is Tom Barrass (194).

Then you must consider that a lot of the 200cm defenders are more interceptors than the player to shut down a Riley Thilthorpe. This includes Harris Andrews, Darcy Moore, Mac Andrew. They aren't gorillas. They can play on monster forwards, but one on one they are going to get out bodied by them, and prefer to intercept or run and jump at the contest.

All you need is good defenders in the 190-200cm range, who are good 1-on-1 and can work effectively in a defensive unit with the others. Height doesn't really matter and is not decisive in success.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top