Ghost Patrol
Incognito Moderatore
- Sep 17, 2019
- 30,101
- 47,335
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #3,624
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Paradox of tolerance.
Should we tolerate the subjugation of women just because it's a cultural norm elsewhere?
Is it our right to judge other cultural norms?
If they want to migrate here, yes.Is it our right to judge other cultural norms?
Is it right to assume that other cultures want to be more western?
Nonsense.It is a pretty arrogant position to take.
No doubt.There are plenty to be seen if one goes to South western Sydney
I see them all the time in Melbourne, it's not shocking.but the hullabaloo from Hanson and the usual centrists of this forum are just Helen Lovejoy style panic and I can guarantee that neither Hanson nor any of the centrists have ever come across a Burqa clad woman.
If? You guaranteed something you're reneging on. Hilarious.And if they did,
Never said it did. Nice strawman.it didn't affect their day one bit.
I don't watch sky. Do you?They're just riled up because sky after dark told them to be.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Right - so now to migrate to Australia you need to adhere to a uniform codeIf they want to migrate here, yes.
Nonsense.

Nice strawman, champ.Right - so now to migrate to Australia you need to adhere to a uniform code
Seriously WTF
Right - so now to migrate to Australia you need to adhere to a uniform code
Seriously WTF
We can only hope they don’t procreate!Imagine being the sort of person who thinks that these two are capable of presenting a viable vision for Australia's future in our part of the world.
View attachment 2486812
There are more than a million voters who think just that according to recent polling.![]()
You sure seem really offended about something you claim to see all the time and that supposedly doesn't bother you and your day (sure bra)No doubt.
I see them all the time in Melbourne, it's not shocking.
If? You guaranteed something you're reneging on. Hilarious.
Never said it did. Nice strawman.
I don't watch sky. Do you?
I post about Christianity more than Islam.You sure seem really offended about something you claim to see all the time and that supposedly doesn't bother you and your day (sure bra)
And 90% of your talking points are identical to the garbage on Sky. You might not watch it first hand but you definitely swallow it without a breath on socials or listen to it from some bozos at the pub and feel the need to regurgitate it here for some reason.
It's all the same one way or another.
I'm also not a fan of religious modesty clothing but you clearly have a crusade against only one of them. It's blatantly obvious it goes beyond the religion.
Banning an item of clothing from an already marginalised community, will solve absolutely **** all, in fact it'll isolate them and make them feel even a lesser part of our community than they already are.
Islam (like all religions) has plenty of problems and I wholeheartedly agree that infringements on personal liberties/human rights shouldn't be excused because of cultural sensitivity. Universal human rights are just that, universal. Excusing some shithouse behaviour because it is embedded in another culture or because of some dogmatic backwards religion isn't being tolerant, it's being stupid.You must have me confused for someone who is pro-Christian.
I won't ignore the misogynistic dress code of Islam just because it's not a 'white' religion. It's kinda pathetic how easily progressives fall over themselves to placate other faiths tbh.
Do you think women want to wear burqas? If its good enough for them, show me some men wearing them in 30C weather.
Some greying ex ranga's could take umbrage at that imageryIf Hanson and Joyce were young enough to conjugate, imagine the offspring... ruddy-faced redheads!
Vile. And pathetic.She really is quite vile.
I’ll just cut in here and say it’s a waste of time arguing what’s racism, what’s religious discrimination, what’s cultural discrimination, when they’re all very neatly gathered up in the one word: bigotry.Most academic anthropologists I've seen referenced these days argue that Islamophobia and many other forms of religious and cultural discrimination is a form of racism.
But interested to hear your view on why it isn't.
With you there mate but I still think common sense should come into it when you hold the responsibilities of public office.No religion or belief is automatically worthy of respect.
There, he said, they'd "have to come to me on each piece of legislation and say 'what are your views?'
And perpetuates patronising stereotypes that men are uncontrollable powder kegs of violent lust and require only the merest glimpse of bare female flesh to send them into a frenzy of sexual indignities.Makes it impossible for these women to assimilate in Australian society.
Symbolises oppression and misogyny towards women.
Do you think women want to wear wonderbras? If its good enough for them, show me some men wearing them in 30C weather.Do you think women want to wear burqas? If its good enough for them, show me some men wearing them in 30C weather.
wouldn't banning the burka be more about freedom for women?
Freedom includes the freedom to wear a face covering unless exposure is necessary for security purposes. If it's as gentle as "you no longer need to wear your uniform everywhere", then we should be stressing it isn't necessary, but not banning it. Otherwise it's "don't you dare wear that uniform or we will legally punish you" which is a very different message.it would be better phrased as
when coming to Australia you no longer need to wear your uniform everywhere.
But (and this is no defence of Joyce) he's acting rationally in this regard. He moved to the reps to become a minister and eventually Deputy PM. Can't do that from the Senate. I'm sure people were also in his ear as the right candidate to knock off Windsor, which he did. Now that there is zero chance of becoming a minister ever again, the place where he can have the most influence is the Senate. Like he did when he (and none of the other 38) was the 39th Coalition Senator from 2005-2008.Joyce has all but held up the white flag on his reps career and made it pretty clear it's all about him with a move back to the Senate.
![]()
Greens out-step flat-footed Liberals on crucial deal
The environmental deal is a major win for a government whose critics on the left are calling for it to be more reformist.www.abc.net.au
Some greying ex ranga's could take umbrage at that imagery
But he has worked hard over many years of imbibing various legal drugs and poisons to acheive that glowing (or glowering?) visageNo issue with rangas, there are some in my family. It's the combination with Beetrooter"s complexion that's scary!