Donkey
Seriously how dumb are people that they can't understand this?
Party X purposefully damages a dam leading to millions of litres of water rushing downstream.
Party Y builds protections around a local village downstream which may or may not prevent it being drowned.
If the village gets drowned, is Party X responsible? Yes.
If the village does not get drowned, is Party Y responsible for that? Yes.
Have we never heard of the term mitigation? OK for all the far left fruit loops but how on earth does that ABC reporter in that tweet not understand something so simple?
Christ.








