Remove this Banner Ad

Scott Morrison - How Long? (Part 1 - Continued in Part 2)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL



**** offfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Is this the same person who in 2013 did all he could to not recognise genuine protection? Crocodile tears!

Scott Morrison agreed his department should intervene in ASIO security checks to try to prevent asylum seekers from being granted permanent protection visas, according to cabinet documents obtained by the ABC.
  • Immigration Department advised up to 700 asylum seekers "must" be granted permanent protection
  • Scott Morrison agreed to "mitigation strategies" including asking ASIO to slow down security checks so deadlines would be missed
  • Without intervention, 30 extra asylum seekers a week could have been granted protection
In late 2013, the then-immigration minister was rushing through changes that would prevent any asylum seekers who arrived by boat from ever being granted permanent protection in Australia.

The Department of Immigration and Border Protection advised Mr Morrison that up to 700 asylum seekers "must" be granted permanent protection under the existing legislation.


The minister was clearly concerned, requesting the exact number and advice on whether he could confer an alternative visa.
The department wrote back with a range of "mitigation strategies" and the minister signed up.


Mr Morrison agreed his secretary should write to the director-general of security to request ASIO delay security checks so that people close to being granted permanent protection would miss the deadline.
 
I think we can safely say Mrs M is totally full of shit.
https://www.smh.com.au/national/morrison-sees-votes-in-anti-muslim-strategy-20110216-1awmo.html
THE opposition immigration spokesman, Scott Morrison, urged the shadow cabinet to capitalise on the electorate's growing concerns about "Muslim immigration", "Muslims in Australia" and the "inability" of Muslim migrants to integrate.

Mr Morrison's suggestion was made at a meeting in December at which shadow ministers were asked to bring three ideas for issues on which the Coalition should concentrate its political attack during this parliamentary term.
 
Hey Tiny T QC, quick question.
Much like the Migration Act the Social Security Act is an administrative provision.
When a person applies for a govt benefit, the govt backdates payment of that benefit to the date their claim for the benefit was made.
Is that because (a) the govt is generous or (B) the manner in which administrative provisions operate?

There is a clue in there for you.
Nuffie 37 I have already told you countless times that even if someone entered the country unlawfully and is granted a visa at a later time, this still doesn't change the fact that they entered the country unlawfully/illegally. The act is very specific on what illegal entry is and when it has happened. If you don't understand this simple fact then I cannot help you.
 
Nuffie 37 I have already told you countless times that even if someone entered the country unlawfully and is granted a visa at a later time, this still doesn't change the fact that they entered the country unlawfully/illegally. The act is very specific on what illegal entry is and when it has happened. If you don't understand this simple fact then I cannot help you.
Read this thread from somebody that actually knows what he’s talking about, then apologist for wrongly labelling them illegal and STFU:thumbsu:

 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Nuffie 37 I have already told you countless times that even if someone entered the country unlawfully and is granted a visa at a later time, this still doesn't change the fact that they entered the country unlawfully/illegally. The act is very specific on what illegal entry is and when it has happened. If you don't understand this simple fact then I cannot help you.

Hey Tiny T QC thanks for your answer, much appreciated, one more question...

Are they granted asylum/visas from the date they applied or from the date the processing of their claim finished?
 
Hey Tiny T QC thanks for your answer, much appreciated, one more question...

Are they granted asylum/visas from the date they applied or from the date the processing of their claim finished?
Has no relevance to the fact of whether they unlawfully entered the country in the first place.
 
Has no relevance to the fact of whether they unlawfully entered the country in the first place.

None at all?
Gotcha.
Explains why they were deported immediately as unlawful entrants AND why there is nobody in immigration detention on Nauru.

Tiny T you are the best, you deserve a medal.
I am going to recommend your services to anybody looking for a great QC. :thumbsu:
 
You're not exactly a student of history now, are you?
LOL you don't exactly need to be a "student of history" to see through Morrison's latest BS. Just a student of logic, reason, truth and honesty.

Logic, Scott Morrison-style™:

Bringing 800 or so asylum seekers to Australia for urgent medical treatment (as his government has done over the past year or so) does NOT encourage people smuggling.

Changing the procedure so that a medical panel can recommend that asylum seekers (nb already in detention) be brought to Australia for urgent medical treatment, and then immediately returned to detention (but the immigration minister can override the medical panel’s ruling anyway) WILL encourage people smuggling.

Shouting “THESE CHANGES WILL ENCOURAGE PEOPLE SMUGGLING” from the highest office in the land will NOT encourage people smuggling.

If that passes your BS threshold, I’d like to introduce you to my good friend, an ex-colonel in the Nigerian armed forces, who has tens of millions of dollars he needs to get out of the country and is willing to pay you handsomely to help him.
 
https://theaimn.com/tough-guy-morrison-only-attacks-the-vulnerable/

Tough guy Morrison only attacks the vulnerable

Does he go after the big corporations and wealthy individuals who avoid paying tax and the lax rules that allow them to? No.
Does he protect the environment from those who put profit first? No.
Does he champion human rights and call out those who abuse them? No
Does he pursue and punish corruption? No.
Does he fight for self-determination for our First People? No.
Does he punish businesses that exploit their workers? No.
Does he insist on transparency and accountability in government? No.
Does he expect and enforce a higher standard of behaviour from his colleagues? No

Bill Shorten is the anti-christ though :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Does anyone though actually believe this when they hear this kind of thing from any poli?

Oh yes, I bet you if he says that in a Hillsong church they'll all be "oh poor Scott, let's pray for him".

Scomo thinks the playing the victim shit works in the real world just coz it worked in his little religion
 
geez, and now we have Birmingham saying that the ex employee of Helloworld is to blame for this "Hockey owes me" shit.
 
geez, and now we have Birmingham saying that the ex employee of Helloworld is to blame for this "Hockey owes me" shit.

No courage whatsoever among any of this rabble of a " government "


The dog did it
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No courage whatsoever among any of this rabble of a " government "


The dog did it
The theme song for this government could be "It wasn't me" by Shaggy or "I didn't do it" by Bart Simpson.
 
He was embarrassing in question time today, he dished the hard question about Hello World off to Pyne to “answer” for him and just regurgitated old Turnbull lines and attacked the unions after Shorten smashed the Liberal party and Morrison which sadly but predictably has received no attention in the media.
 
He was embarrassing in question time today, he dished the hard question about Hello World off to Pyne to “answer” for him and just regurgitated old Turnbull lines and attacked the unions after Shorten smashed the Liberal party and Morrison which sadly but predictably has received no attention in the media.
I saw a little bit of that. Started ranting about who's a union member and to put their hands up. Embarrassing from our PM.
 
https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au...n-ignored-boat-security-advice/15508404007499

Morrison ignored boat security advice


Before the medivac bill passed last week, Prime Minister Scott Morrison and his security ministers were advised they could lessen the risk it posed to border protection by insisting medical transferees from Manus Island and Nauru were sent back after treatment – but they chose not to

The government’s decision not to attempt amendments to the medivac bill, which could have addressed the agencies’ concerns, has enabled it to accuse Labor of undermining Operation Sovereign Borders


SNL.gif
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Newspoll apparently 51/49

Shorten needs to start being aggressive otherwise Morrison will win easily come May.
Don’t you tire of being wrong?

Morrison won’t be winning it let alone easily, it’s a matter of reducing the amount of seats they lose which he’s doing a bad job of.
 
Don’t you tire of being wrong?

Morrison won’t be winning it let alone easily, it’s a matter of reducing the amount of seats they lose which he’s doing a bad job of.
Clearly you haven’t met Adz before on the main board.
 
Jacinta is a thoroughly decent human being. It must have been particularly difficult for her to be in the presence of Morrison - the complete opposite.

Well done to her for doing so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom