One thing we do suck at is tribunal nights. Would be looking to recruit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Adelaide v Western Bulldogs - Rd 2 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Dogs at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 2
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Is the force he swings his arm severe ? Would class it lower than lowHarris had a look ,saw him and whacked him. Obviously he had no intention of hitting him in the head but seeing he concussed him I don't really see any way out.
Maybe recruit Carlton's Cripps defence legal team.One thing we do suck at is tribunal nights. Would be looking to recruit
Harris addressed this though, and said he saw him over his other shoulder and he was standing at full height. The tribunal in their justification specifically mention that Harris should have (somehow) known that Jones was going to lower his body while running behind him out of view.Harris had a look ,saw him and whacked him. Obviously he had no intention of hitting him in the head but seeing he concussed him I don't really see any way out.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
| Riak Andrew | Quad | TBC |
| Ned Bowman | Hamstring | 5-6 weeks |
| Braeden Campbell | Shin | TBC |
| Billy Cootee | Thigh | 2-3 weeks |
| Harry Cunningham | Quad | Test |
| Jesse Dattoli | Foot | Test |
| Tom Hanily | Shin | 1-2 weeks |
| Max King | Back | 5 months |
| Jevan Phillipou | Quad | Test |
| Updated: March 10, 2026 |
Okay but what if we just put a fake moustache on Harris and say it’s Joyce?
are there any rules against that?
I only think Bailey’s action was directly a result of the bulldogs physical approach (and i tend to think he has form in this area).I really think that teams are going to come at us really hard this year: ie
Verbally and physically to try and put us off our game a bit.
It obviously worked on Saturday against the doggies with 3 suspensions out of the game out of frustration, Sydney will come hard for us again so I hope that Fages has them ready for that side of the game and to be a Goldfish and forget about it and just play the game.
Equally physical but smart and the ball needs to be the focus not the man.
Interesting point Dalions. We've seen over the years that once a team is seen as a dominant team in the competition their tactics and responses to needling seem to get rougher due to a bit of hubris in being challenged verbally and physically.I really think that teams are going to come at us really hard this year: ie
Verbally and physically to try and put us off our game a bit.
It obviously worked on Saturday against the doggies with 3 suspensions out of the game out of frustration, Sydney will come hard for us again so I hope that Fages has them ready for that side of the game and to be a Goldfish and forget about it and just play the game.
Equally physical but smart and the ball needs to be the focus not the man.
Gardiner hit was late which would have been a 50 anyway imo.I only think Bailey’s action was directly a result of the bulldogs physical approach (and i tend to think he has form in this area).
Harris’s suspension was an unfortunate action in play.
Gardiner’s was a slightly sloppy attempt to “make him earn it”.
That aside, agree with the rest of what you said. Bez already suggested the team will be galvanised by the challenge (or words to that effect).
Looking for the silver lining, Harris being out for 3 weeks gives a bit of a run of what a backline looks at if the worst happens and Harris goes down late in the year.
The inconsistency is the most frustrating thing.At the end of the day Michael Christian is a moron and the Tribunal is run by muppets.
I only think Bailey’s action was directly a result of the bulldogs physical approach (and i tend to think he has form in this area).
Harris’s suspension was an unfortunate action in play.
Gardiner’s was a slightly sloppy attempt to “make him earn it”.
That aside, agree with the rest of what you said. Bez already suggested the team will be galvanised by the challenge (or words to that effect).
Looking for the silver lining, Harris being out for 3 weeks gives a bit of a run of what a backline looks at if the worst happens and Harris goes down late in the year.
I just find the whole thing so backwards too. Things like Bailey’s incident and Gardiner’s are the things that they SHOULD be trying to stamp out of the game; yet Harris’s gets the longest suspension by far for what was ultimately a complete accident.The inconsistency is the most frustrating thing.
Michael Christian has been there way too long, IMO go back to the old match review panel, need more than 1 persons view on it, a slim line panel of 3 would be better eg Leigh Matthews, Travis Boak, Jack Ziebell.
He is likely part of the Demetriou files so has a job for life even though he is incompetent.I just find the whole thing so backwards too. Things like Bailey’s incident and Gardiner’s are the things that they SHOULD be trying to stamp out of the game; yet Harris’s gets the longest suspension by far for what was ultimately a complete accident.
It’s the one thing that I think the NRL does well; where a few years ago now they got sick of the cheap shots and so introduced harsher punishments that escalated with subsequent offences; and a lot of that has now been stamped out as intended.
Will never forget when Toby Greene got 1 week for eye gouging Neale (after escaping without a suspension for eye gouging Bont literally 1 week earlier); yet in that same year an NRL player was suspended for something like 6-8 games for an eye gouge.
Christian is completely off base and has been for years.
Froggy will go to him.If Doedee is a wrist I’d almost like to see us strap it up and let him play. I personally have 0 faith in Joyce manning Charlie.
The tribunal often says insane shit like that whenever something like this happens. Not just because it is one of our players but the justification at times for holding suspensions up were things like that the player should've known in the time it take to take a single step while running at full speed that his opponent was going to go to ground, or that he should have known that the other play was going to get the ball a split second earlier than him and exited out of the contest etc. The Archer suspension and the logic the tribunal had to uphold it still shits me.Harris addressed this though, and said he saw him over his other shoulder and he was standing at full height. The tribunal in their justification specifically mention that Harris should have (somehow) known that Jones was going to lower his body while running behind him out of view.
Seems like a pretty insane thing to say