AFL Player 13: Nik Cox - cleared to return! - 11/11

[Beerfish]

Contract Status: Out of contract 2026
My Boy Draft 2024: Pick 6, Rick Ross

 

[ghostdog]

Are you?

I'm totally f%^$&# f%$@& off with that nonsense.

Otherwise, I'm dandy.

 

[dank420_]

I'm totally f%^$&# f%$@& off with that nonsense.

Otherwise, I'm dandy.

It was fine.

 

[Aido1979]

Um, you literally have written that Cox "Has come off a back injury which has a massive effect on your whole body ability to train and confidence." Yep, good reason to build through the VFL.

"He won't be fit enough to impact games as we'd hope due to this in 2023." Yep, another good reason to build through the VFL, so actually, that point of view absolutely holds weight.

Ironically, the two viewpoints you've given hold more weight collectively than Nik Cox's body does, and they're your arguments. That's quite something.

And yes, he does pick and choose when to go, and I get that that's because he lacks confidence in his body. Now, given that we're still a chance for finals, and Scott has said numerous times that playing finals is the goal, wouldn't it be wise to play the guy who "hasn't been able to do any work in the gym or in the track whilst recovering from a back injury" in the VFL?

Wouldn't that be a more appropriate standard of competition at the moment for him to "get games into the kid to battle harden his body" and "build confidence"?

He's been selected recently because we've lacked connection between the arcs and Cox has the height to mark the ball. It's also been pretty clear, though, that he's not entirely ready and has possibly come back to the top level too soon.

That he should play in the VFL at the moment is therefore entirely reasonable, and actually is an excellent example of supporters tempering their expectations.

If he gets his body right, I have confidence that he could do some "unicorn sh$%" once again. He has that potential.

I think that puts paid to your melty nonsense. You good now?

Um, you literally have written that Cox "Has come off a back injury which has a massive effect on your whole body ability to train and confidence." Yep, good reason to build through the VFL.

He played VFL we have had ¼ of our list playing and are getting flogged, won’t help him, potentially detrimental to his development - He needs to be played at AFL level and get games and development into him in the big time- Along the lines of what they are doing.

"He won't be fit enough to impact games as we'd hope due to this in 2023." Yep, another good reason to build through the VFL, so actually, that point of view absolutely holds weight.

If we had a full list playing and competition for spots was hot you might have a point but I dare say he would still be getting a game in some capacity as he is seen as a big part of our future.


Ironically, the two viewpoints you've given hold more weight collectively than Nik Cox's body does, and they're your arguments. That's quite something.

Attacking the kid again these are just junk comments from a grown man from behind a computer screen.

And yes, he does pick and choose when to go, and I get that that's because he lacks confidence in his body. Now, given that we're still a chance for finals, and Scott has said numerous times that playing finals is the goal, wouldn't it be wise to play the guy who "hasn't been able to do any work in the gym or in the track whilst recovering from a back injury" in the VFL?

Wouldn't that be a more appropriate standard of competition at the moment for him to "get games into the kid to battle harden his body" and "build confidence"?

Not with the injuries we have had and our lack of depth, how does getting pumped in the VFL help a good kid and potentially a big part of our future? Who you bringing in? There are many plusses to playing the kid – Not many languishing in VFL.

He's been selected recently because we've lacked connection between the arcs and Cox has the height to mark the ball. It's also been pretty clear, though, that he's not entirely ready and has possibly come back to the top level too soon.

Our lack of connection is moving the ball from half back – Our forward line particularly Half Forward is our biggest problem and has been for some time, slow ball movement from half back not honouring leads from forwards also has been part of the problem. It’s improved.

That he should play in the VFL at the moment is therefore entirely reasonable, and actually is an excellent example of supporters tempering their expectations.

Who are you bringing in???? Just don’t play Cox??? Don’t list players who are now ready to come back from injury – List them over the last four weeks!

If he gets his body right, I have confidence that he could do some "unicorn sh$%" once again. He has that potential.
Potentially but that’s a dirty word in professional sport isn’t it – The big P word!


I think that puts paid to your melty nonsense. You good now?

Un-bunch your panties!

 

[ghostdog]

Um, you literally have written that Cox "Has come off a back injury which has a massive effect on your whole body ability to train and confidence." Yep, good reason to build through the VFL.

He played VFL we have had ¼ of our list playing and are getting flogged, won’t help him, potentially detrimental to his development - He needs to be played at AFL level and get games and development into him in the big time- Along the lines of what they are doing.

"He won't be fit enough to impact games as we'd hope due to this in 2023." Yep, another good reason to build through the VFL, so actually, that point of view absolutely holds weight.

If we had a full list playing and competition for spots was hot you might have a point but I dare say he would still be getting a game in some capacity as he is seen as a big part of our future.


Ironically, the two viewpoints you've given hold more weight collectively than Nik Cox's body does, and they're your arguments. That's quite something.

Attacking the kid again these are just junk comments from a grown man from behind a computer screen.

And yes, he does pick and choose when to go, and I get that that's because he lacks confidence in his body. Now, given that we're still a chance for finals, and Scott has said numerous times that playing finals is the goal, wouldn't it be wise to play the guy who "hasn't been able to do any work in the gym or in the track whilst recovering from a back injury" in the VFL?

Wouldn't that be a more appropriate standard of competition at the moment for him to "get games into the kid to battle harden his body" and "build confidence"?

Not with the injuries we have had and our lack of depth, how does getting pumped in the VFL help a good kid and potentially a big part of our future? Who you bringing in? There are many plusses to playing the kid – Not many languishing in VFL.

He's been selected recently because we've lacked connection between the arcs and Cox has the height to mark the ball. It's also been pretty clear, though, that he's not entirely ready and has possibly come back to the top level too soon.

Our lack of connection is moving the ball from half back – Our forward line particularly Half Forward is our biggest problem and has been for some time, slow ball movement from half back not honouring leads from forwards also has been part of the problem. It’s improved.

That he should play in the VFL at the moment is therefore entirely reasonable, and actually is an excellent example of supporters tempering their expectations.

Who are you bringing in???? Just don’t play Cox??? Don’t list players who are now ready to come back from injury – List them over the last four weeks!

If he gets his body right, I have confidence that he could do some "unicorn sh$%" once again. He has that potential.
Potentially but that’s a dirty word in professional sport isn’t it – The big P word!


I think that puts paid to your melty nonsense. You good now?

Un-bunch your panties!

He played VFL we have had ¼ of our list playing and are getting flogged, won’t help him, potentially detrimental to his development - He needs to be played at AFL level and get games and development into him in the big time- Along the lines of what they are doing.

So the difference in our opinions here is in terms of his development; I don't see the sense in pummelling his body and confidence playing the top level of football, where he has clearly been found wanting. IMO, he currently needs to find confidence in his body at VFL level. You think he needs to develop his ability at AFL level. To me, his physical resilience needs to underpin that. How you can ignore your own quote, that his injury has had "a massive effect on your whole body ability to train and confidence.", frankly, is bewildering.

If we had a full list playing and competition for spots was hot you might have a point but I dare say he would still be getting a game in some capacity as he is seen as a big part of our future.

Okay, so Ridley gets injured and Cox gets a backline role. Was he needed there? No, because Baldwin was available but initially overlooked. Interestingly, Baldwin reportedly was tearing up the VFL, so your suggestion that the players can't develop there is rubbish - but I digress. Cox is then pushed onto a wing, but he's not needed there either; Martin and Durham have been doing fine, but Marto was pushed forward - he didn't need to be and Cox could have continued to develop in the VFL, where reportedly he wasn't exactly flying. I agree though, he is a big part of our future.

Attacking the kid again these are just junk comments from a grown man from behind a computer screen.

"Attacking"?! What hyperbolic rubbish. I was clearly mucking around with you. Cox is skinny and his physical development appears negligible, and of course I understand that's because he's been injured. It was more a comment on the quality of your post. It was a junk post though. My apologies. I'll be more careful replying to you in future.

Not with the injuries we have had and our lack of depth, how does getting pumped in the VFL help a good kid and potentially a big part of our future? Who you bringing in? There are many plusses to playing the kid – Not many languishing in VFL.

Again, Balders was available. Cox didn't need to play. IMO, developing in the VFL isn't languishing unless you're beating the door down. If anything, it was Baldwin who was languishing, as demonstrated by his performance against North.

Our lack of connection is moving the ball from half back – Our forward line particularly Half Forward is our biggest problem and has been for some time, slow ball movement from half back not honouring leads from forwards also has been part of the problem. It’s improved.

I agree with this, except for whether it's improved. The excellent article someone posted from the ABC yesterday/today suggests otherwise if I'm remembering correctly. I'm hoping either Cox or Jones helps us fix that, or Cox can develop into a tall back. I don't like him on a wing.

Who are you bringing in???? Just don’t play Cox??? Don’t list players who are now ready to come back from injury – List them over the last four weeks!

I've answered this question sufficiently. Easy with the punctuation marks there. Unbunch those panties and stop yelling at me Devon.

Potentially but that’s a dirty word in professional sport isn’t it – The big P word!

Yes, everyone likes potential. It gives hope. Even you like potential. You might recall these insights; "He played VFL we have had ¼ of our list playing and are getting flogged, won’t help him, potentially detrimental to his development"
"...how does getting pumped in the VFL help a good kid and potentially a big part of our future?"
I'm actually not even sure what your issue is with that word, so I remain.

 

[brain taylor]

guys can we please keep the fighting to the parish thread?

 

[TheFrenchCut]

He is going to need a huge pre-season to become genuine best 22. Yeesh.

 

[Jobe Watson]

Soft. Weak. Slow. No football IQ. Skills aren't great.

 

[ant555]

Looked like he had half an idea of what to do in the back half. When he was in the wing he was just running in circles and not looking like he would get a touch .

 

[andleanback]

Honestly keep playing him on the wing and he’ll be out of the system in 2 years. Totally devoid of confidence and looks scared being out there. Did actually bodyline the ball once in the 2nd qtr then Absolutely shanked it

 

[kelvin_sheedy]

My biggest concern is his upper body. Width of shoulders look abnormally small. Will need a decade to get the strength to play.

Still has lots to offer and he can come good.

 

[jannissary]

that dropped mark early on made me lose hope in him as a player.

uncontested, surrounded by teammates, and he elects go drop a risky mark instead of take a safe chest mark.

terrible decision making, can’t see a contract extension in his future

 

[FlyingV]

Looks at his best as a rebounding defender. Problem is he’s a total liability when the ball hits the deck in his vicinity, which we can’t afford to have.

 

[DERO]

Getting Kepler Bradley vibes (I'm sorry).

 

[Zach Package]

Has had a couple of shocking drops in the last couple of weeks but it’s proof of concept for him as a key back, I would have thought we didn’t need more proof but I guess this just rams it home.

Looks adept as a back shoulder defender for leading forwards, is super agile as far as key talls go and neat skills off both sides by hand and foot.

 

[Milanista28]

I'm likely nuts but I'm not worried about the big boy. He's at 20% in terms of development. 3 pre seasons and 60 games from now he'll be a player.

 

[MarkJohnson#1]

Thought he was a fraction better tonight. Am I wrong..?

 

[southern_crusher]

Will never make it when you're so scared of contact and absolutely no appetite for the footy

 

[Bunk Moreland]

Since the day he was drafted I’ve said it. He’s either a ruckman, a key forward or a key back.

Work out which it is, quickly, and do it.

 

[andleanback]

Thought he was a fraction better tonight. Am I wrong..?

He was good outside dropping that pud

 

[yodellinhank]

I'm likely nuts but I'm not worried about the big boy. He's at 20% in terms of development. 3 pre seasons and 60 games from now he'll be a player.

Whereabouts?

 

[BomberTime]

Won’t make it.

But we will persist with him for 8 years.

He will make enough money.

It is the way.

 

[Schnitzengruben]

I think he did some good things and overall looks better behind the ball. Needs a solid pre-season under his belt.

Probably has very little confidence in his own game right now which is why he's getting bodied so easy. I'm still on board.

 

[Blind Turn]

He’ll be fine you worrywarts.

 

[yodellinhank]

He’ll be fine you worrywarts.

Fine at what?

 

[Greendogg5]

I compare him with Mac Andrew at the Gold Coast and Mac seems miles ahead of him in terms of development