eth-dog
Tier 1 WW Player
Hard to deal withWhy do I feel like Essendon is under more pressure to trade Fantasia that WB are to trade Dunkley?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hard to deal withWhy do I feel like Essendon is under more pressure to trade Fantasia that WB are to trade Dunkley?
Fanta pants nearly left last year (very publicly) and he’s trying to leave again this year. No brainer why Essendon are under more pressure.Why do I feel like Essendon is under more pressure to trade Fantasia that WB are to trade Dunkley?
Fanta pants nearly left last year (very publicly) and he’s trying to leave again this year. No brainer why Essendon are under more pressure.
Maybe not a public request to be traded - but no doubt that last year he expressed to the club a desire to leave and they talked him round by explaining how awesome 2020 was going to be.Its funny because that's the perception but there was no public announcement that he wanted to leave. Just a lot of talk and innuendo. It wasn't like Daniher who said "trade me to Sydney".
So I think you can reasonably argue this is the first year that Fantasia has asked to be traded.
I reckon future second might suit us moreThis should be pretty straightforward.
Take ports 2nd and move on.
That’s good we want next years first anywaySupposedly Port will pull pick #28 to use it in a deal with Sydney involving Aliir and Hickey.
Supposedly Port will pull pick #28 to use it in a deal with Sydney involving Aliir and Hickey.
Gee, Port really doing their best to trade for a player that they've gotten to nominate their club.Supposedly Port will pull pick #28 to use it in a deal with Sydney involving Aliir and Hickey.
we should take 28.Gee, Port really doing their best to trade for a player that they've gotten to nominate their club.
Nah, if Carlton want a second then they can give us a second back. They get nothing more than a 3rd back and that’s only coz he’s out of contract.we should take 28.
If Carlton want a 2nd added to Saad for 8 and future 3rd, we add that rather than future 2nd.
Gee, Port really doing their best to trade for a player that they've gotten to nominate their club.
Your tears are deliciousPort have done their best. Our best offer, widely considered to be very fair if not overs, has been unreasonably rejected. If Essendon miss out on #28 for Fantasia the fault lies with one man and one man alone.
Kochie? Widely considered? By who exactly?Port have done their best. Our best offer, widely considered to be very fair if not overs, has been unreasonably rejected. If Essendon miss out on #28 for Fantasia the fault lies with one man and one man alone.
Your tears are delicious
Kochie? Widely considered? By who exactly?
Your constant coming over and moaning about it really sells that.Tears lol. This is a great development. I'd much rather have Aliir on our list than Fantasia.
Basically every media source who has cared to comment on the matter, basically every opposition supporter who has cared to comment on the matter, and by the looks of the Drafts & Trading board even most Essendon supporters who have cared to comment on the matter.
Apart from that? You’ll never tear us apartTears lol. This is a great development. I'd much rather have Aliir on our list than Fantasia.
Basically every media source who has cared to comment on the matter, basically every opposition supporter who has cared to comment on the matter, and by the looks of the Drafts & Trading board even most Essendon supporters who have cared to comment on the matter.
28 for Fantasia is good.Kochie? Widely considered? By who exactly?
I reckon future second might suit us more
The reason we've been talking future pick swaps with Carlton on top of 8 is because we dont have a 2nd this year and our only 3rd we need for acadamy bids. If we'd taken 28 on day 1 which was/is a fairly generous offer, we could've given 28 to Carlton with Saad and asked for a 3rd back. Wouldve strengthened our points for acadamy bids this year and we'd have 6,7,8 and would probably be further adavanced in Dunkley and Caldwell talks. Maybe Dodoro will land all his targets and he might be able to get a future 2nd for Raz instead, which would be great. But for me if he misses any of our targets and doesn't get significantly better than 28 for Raz ill be pretty dirty on him.Was thinking the same thing. Right now we do not have a final list size and how many picks are we going to use up this year anyway.
Could also help the Carlton deal. Give them Saad and one of the future seconds (ours or Ports) for 8 and their future third.
With 6-7-8 we could still trade with Geelong for 15+20. Give up 15 for Caldwell and still have two picks inside the top 10 plus 20 -48-67-73-78.
I think the fact that future first round picks will be needed for Dunkley may have some bearing on not jumping in early.The reason we've been talking future pick swaps with Carlton on top of 8 is because we dont have a 2nd this year and our only 3rd we need for acadamy bids. If we'd taken 28 on day 1 which was/is a fairly generous offer, we could've given 28 to Carlton with Saad and asked for a 3rd back. Wouldve strengthened our points for acadamy bids this year and we'd have 6,7,8 and would probably be further adavanced in Dunkley and Caldwell talks. Maybe Dodoro will land all his targets and he might be able to get a future 2nd for Raz instead, which would be great. But for me if he misses any of our targets and doesn't get significantly better than 28 for Raz ill be pretty dirty on him.
Was thinking the same thing. Right now we do not have a final list size and how many picks are we going to use up this year anyway.
Could also help the Carlton deal. Give them Saad and one of the future seconds (ours or Ports) for 8 and their future third.
With 6-7-8 we could still trade with Geelong for 15+20. Give up 15 for Caldwell and still have two picks inside the top 10 plus 20 -48-67-73-78.