God I love Newcastle Utd at the moment
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Does anyone here think Blight would have left Massie on Buddy in 2007?
Sent from my HTC_0P6B6 using Tapatalk
Neil still thinks it was the right move tooWhen did you last watch the replay of this match?
I was so shattered by the Buddy goal with a few seconds to go that I never watched the replay until the weekend (it was on Foxfooty last week).
It is now universally agreed that playing a midget on Buddy cost us the match. A sunny day with the roof open at Etihad is totally different to a wet windy night at Footy Park. It was obvious to a 10 year old that Buddy would slaughter Massie in aerial contests. So, how many of Buddy's seven goals came from contested marks? How many contested marks did Buddy take?
There were a number of reasons we lost that match and watching again Massie on Buddy wasn't the sole reason or IMHO the key reason. I believe a bigger factor was playing injured players. Does anyone recall how Roo played?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Roo sat most of the day on the bench IIRC
True Massie on Buddy was not what cost us the game.When did you last watch the replay of this match?
I was so shattered by the Buddy goal with a few seconds to go that I never watched the replay until the weekend (it was on Foxfooty last week).
It is now universally agreed that playing a midget on Buddy cost us the match. A sunny day with the roof open at Etihad is totally different to a wet windy night at Footy Park. It was obvious to a 10 year old that Buddy would slaughter Massie in aerial contests. So, how many of Buddy's seven goals came from contested marks? How many contested marks did Buddy take?
There were a number of reasons we lost that match and watching again Massie on Buddy wasn't the sole reason or IMHO the key reason. I believe a bigger factor was playing injured players. Does anyone recall how Roo played?
When did you last watch the replay of this match?
I was so shattered by the Buddy goal with a few seconds to go that I never watched the replay until the weekend (it was on Foxfooty last week).
It is now universally agreed that playing a midget on Buddy cost us the match. A sunny day with the roof open at Etihad is totally different to a wet windy night at Footy Park. It was obvious to a 10 year old that Buddy would slaughter Massie in aerial contests. So, how many of Buddy's seven goals came from contested marks? How many contested marks did Buddy take?
There were a number of reasons we lost that match and watching again Massie on Buddy wasn't the sole reason or IMHO the key reason. I believe a bigger factor was playing injured players. Does anyone recall how Roo played?
Buddy's never been a contested marking player. What he is though is a natural forward. What needed to happen was an experienced defender have a go. One that knows the angles and how to minimise the damage by pushing the opponent to the less damaging areas. Massie has not those skills. He basically just followed him around and had no proactive contribution to the contest.
I'm sure the 10 year old you referenced earlier was also worried about Massie on Franklin at ground level, on the lead, in the air, slipping out the back, too fast, too agile, too smart.He should not have played, we effectively played one man short. He had announced his retirement during the week and was not in a fit condition to play. He spent half the match on the bench and had 4 touches.
Anyone see the replay? Any guesses on how much Buddy monstered Massie in one-on-one contests?
P.S. Spackler,
Have you ever watched the replay? Did you notice any loose men in defence?![]()
Anyone get a sense of Deja Vu ? .......Trigg ......Craig ......
Surely you have to move forward not keep rehashing the past![]()
Still shaking my head in disbelief...I'm sure the 10 year old you referenced earlier was also worried about Massie on Franklin at ground level, on the lead, in the air, slipping out the back, too fast, too agile, too smart.
11 kicks, 7 marks, 7.2
Fortunately our AA key defender Nathan Bock managed to keep Tim Boyle quiet. So that was a massive win for the coaching staff.
Nasser Hussain still thinks his bowlers just bowled poorly Day 1 at the Gabba too.
I'm sure the 10 year old you referenced earlier was also worried about Massie on Franklin at ground level, on the lead, in the air, slipping out the back, too fast, too agile, too smart.
11 kicks, 7 marks, 7.2
Fortunately our AA key defender Nathan Bock managed to keep Tim Boyle quiet. So that was a massive win for the coaching staff.
Scott Stevens played on Ben Dixon but carry on with your delusion.
If it's any consolation, Neil can't get over it either.
Maybe Massie could have played on Robert Harvey?
I suppose Buddy didn't kick 8, which I presume would have been the result with any other player on him. Reminds me of the blokes who lauded VB's hard tag of Pendles and Swan for a half each at 18 touches. You see, they got 22 in the half that the pesky VB wasn't all over them like a rash. So 18 was a monumental effort.
From what TMS said he certainly won't be at the Crows, that's for sure.I reckon ROK will be an assistant coach at Carlton next year![]()
Perhaps you could send Peter Jonas a copy?Two questions.
When did you last watch this match?
Do you want me to send you a copy?
If you insist on talking bullshit then I will watch the replay again tonight and document who was standing who for everyone of their forward entries.
From what TMS said he certainly won't be at the Crows, that's for sure.
Anyway, someone isn't a fan of Craigys methods it seems.
http://www.sen.com.au/news/12-15/denham-blasts-neil-craig-over-bikes-at-blues#LK4f8zDVZEzsTTK8.97
I could never understand Craig's reliance on bike training for footy players.
His coaching career has been hijacked.
This time they have a ready-made scapegoat though...that's really it, isn't it? Carlton are about to try to prove Craig right, five years after the last time it didn't work, with inferior playing stock.
"it will end in tears"
...that's really it, isn't it? Carlton are about to try to prove Craig right, five years after the last time it didn't work, with inferior playing stock.
"it will end in tears"