Remove this Banner Ad

2015; Player X or Player Y or Player Z

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well getting Ablett isn't an extra trade because when you get him in you would be upgrading a rookie to a premium anyway

That's if Ablett's drop in price coincides with your rookie maxing out in appreciation. I wouldn't bet on that lining up. If you have to go early on a Dom Tyson and miss his extra 80K appreciation then it's hardly worth it
 
After some opinions on Dangerfield Vs. Watson and Goldstein and rookie F5 Vs. Leuenberger and Bellchambers F5 and ruck coverage.

Leaning towards Watson because of his consistency, obviously injury is a concern.

Danger & goldy
tbc spud. Looney be injured sadly by rd 4

Danger played all last season injured and only 80%odd time on ground. More scope for improvement than jobe imo
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

After some opinions on Dangerfield Vs. Watson and Goldstein and rookie F5 Vs. Leuenberger and Bellchambers F5 and ruck coverage.

Leaning towards Watson because of his consistency, obviously injury is a concern.
Watson and Goldstein
 
Danger & goldy
tbc spud. Looney be injured sadly by rd 4

Danger played all last season injured and only 80%odd time on ground. More scope for improvement than jobe imo

Only knock on Dangerfield is historically he has slow starts to seasons, however this season his starting price is substantially less than the preceding two seasons so any monetary loss due to another slow start is mitigated somewhat. Adelaide also have a pretty nice run fixture wise early on plus Watson has that annoying round 12 bye.
 
After some opinions on Dangerfield Vs. Watson and Goldstein and rookie F5 Vs. Leuenberger and Bellchambers F5 and ruck coverage.

Leaning towards Watson because of his consistency, obviously injury is a concern.

Danger/Watson is a tough one to split but I'd lean towards Danger. I don't think we've seen the best of Danger yet so feel he has more upside.

As for Rucks, without a doubt Goldstein and rookie F5, not even close IMO. Bellchambers will not score well enough to justify a spot in your forward line & he's injured more often than not. Go with Goldy, Leuy and be prepared to burn a trade if you cop an injury. I would rather sacrifice 1 trade than ensure I have a swing man for Leuy. If Leuy gets injured you'll have to trade him anyway so no point having a spud R3 in TBC.
 
Danger/Watson is a tough one to split but I'd lean towards Danger. I don't think we've seen the best of Danger yet so feel he has more upside.

As for Rucks, without a doubt Goldstein and rookie F5, not even close IMO. Bellchambers will not score well enough to justify a spot in your forward line & he's injured more often than not. Go with Goldy, Leuy and be prepared to burn a trade if you cop an injury. I would rather sacrifice 1 trade than ensure I have a swing man for Leuy. If Leuy gets injured you'll have to trade him anyway so no point having a spud R3 in TBC.

I would have slapped myself in the face two weeks ago for entertaining the idea of having Bellchambers in my team. Time and idle hands do strange things to a man.

Appreciate the input.
 
I would have slapped myself in the face two weeks ago for entertaining the idea of having Bellchambers in my team. Time and idle hands do strange things to a man.

Appreciate the input.

No problem, personally I'll be avoiding both Kreuzer & Leuy unless one of them dominates pre-season. I think there are much better options for under-priced rucks capable of average 110+ (Goldy, Minson, NicNat, Maric). Safer picks & can save money elsewhere.
 
Ward.
will score more points
This.

Picking Treloar over Ward is the sort of thing that I'd do in about round 15 when I'm in desperate catch up mode, thinking the $30k is going to do me good with another out-of-left-field midpricer (who in turn proceeds to churn out exactly the 63 a week that his price suggests he should), then two weeks later it becomes painfully obvious that I've outsmarted myself and Ward is just flat out better and more consistent.

Not that I'm bitter.
 
Ward vs Barlow

Interesting choice. Personally I would wait until the NAB cup to see how GWS structures their team before deciding on Ward.

Right now Barlow, simply because I cant see why he wouldn't continue going about his business as usual. His role isn't going to change, and he has been pretty consistent the last couple of years. Only down side his he is never really going to give you many big scores. He has only topped 120 9 times in the last 2 years.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So starting with Pendles/Sidey/Swan no issue? I guess with Beams gone not really a problem.
That's different. You never mentioned them before.

Take Fyfe or Rocky instead of Pendles and then take Sidey?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Well 2014 Pendles Avg. 124, Beams Avg. 118, Sidey Avg. 113. You could justify having all 3 last year so I don't think it's an issue.
Are you really answering your own questions?? o_O
 
Well 2014 Pendles Avg. 124, Beams Avg. 118, Sidey Avg. 113. You could justify having all 3 last year so I don't think it's an issue.

Your banking on a bit of a rarity there, although if your willing Collingwood are a safe bet to do it with, they have had a few years with 3 of their mids running above 110.
 
Your banking on a bit of a rarity there, although if your willing Collingwood are a safe bet to do it with, they have had a few years with 3 of their mids running above 110.

Yeah was just making that point that its not impossible for 3 from the same team to average high. FWIW I think Pendles and Sidebottom will average higher and Swan more likely around 100.
 
Yeah was just making that point that its not impossible for 3 from the same team to average high. FWIW I think Pendles and Sidebottom will average higher and Swan more likely around 100.

That would be the safe bet.

Swan's best is past him, although he should still be one of the top forwards, his time as a top mid is no more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top