2015; Player X or Player Y or Player Z

[MightyMark]

Pendles v Fyfe

Tough call but I'm probably going to need to start without one and I can't decide who.

Pendles, has been at the top of the pile a lot more than Fyfe, Fyfe has only topped 110 once, Pendles has topped 120 for the last 4 years, including beating out Ablett in 2011.

 

[SnappyHappy]

Pendles, has been at the top of the pile a lot more than Fyfe, Fyfe has only topped 110 once, Pendles has topped 120 for the last 4 years, including beating out Ablett in 2011.

Fyfe is youger though and still on the rise. Imagine if he improves his DE%? I think he has more scope for improvement than Pendles but Pendles is just so reliable.

 

[MightyMark]

Fyfe is youger though and still on the rise. Imagine if he improves his DE%? I think he has more scope for improvement than Pendles but Pendles is just so reliable.

Pendles is only 27, so not exactly past his prime. He is coming off the back a what many consider to be his worst in recent history and he still managed an average of 124.

 

[SnappyHappy]

Pendles is only 27, so not exactly past his prime. He is coming off the back a what many consider to be his worst in recent history and he still managed an average of 124.

Yeah, I really want both. I might start without Rockliff instead even though I really really want to.

 

[Kadog]

Goldstein/J.Steven vs
Minson/Dangerfield

 

[JohnnyDrama1]

Goldstein/J.Steven vs
Minson/Dangerfield

Go Minson and someone else contract talks could effect Danger. Parker or Prestia better options

 

[Feerits Elf]

Biggs v Newton v NVB?

 

[cdcanman]

Biggs v Newton v NVB?

Biggs probably. Pity we can't pick him as a defender.
Newton may surprise a few at Melbourne. Could crack their midfield rotation

 

[MightyMark]

Biggs v Newton v NVB?

You will probably get the same scores out of cheaper rookies. Biggs would be your best bet from that lot.

 

[Feerits Elf]

You will probably get the same scores out of cheaper rookies.

Yeah, but those cheaper rookies are already in my team.

 

[MightyMark]

Yeah, but those cheaper rookies are already in my team.

How many rookies have you already got?

 

[Super Hans]

Joel Selwood vs Dayne Beams.

 

[MightyMark]

Joel Selwood vs Dayne Beams.

Selwood

 

[Feerits Elf]

How many rookies have you already got?

Five or six

 

[MightyMark]

Five or six

If you have 6 already why do you need Biggs

 

[Feerits Elf]

If you have 6 already

Or five

 

[MightyMark]

Or five

Then get a 6th rookie.

They are all place holders for the time being but all of Atkins, Heeney, Boekhurst, Lambert, Jansen, Steele, Sinclair, Smith, Freeman, Ellis-Yolman, Dick and Anderson present value.

 

[toxic]

Then get a 6th rookie.

They are all place holders for the time being but all of Atkins, Heeney, Boekhurst, Lambert, Jansen, Steele, Sinclair, Smith, Freeman, Ellis-Yolman, Dick and Anderson present value.

Agreed just sit one in their until selections and NAb

 

[Seymour Skinner]

Fyfe and TMitch vs Barlow and Buddy?

 

[Goats]

Fyfe and Titch, that's a damn fine combo.

 

[Seymour Skinner]

Yep, was more drawn to that. TMitch named round 1 and it'll be set in stone.

 

[Kadog]

Joel Selwood vs Dayne Beams.

Beams

 

[CaptainChardonnay]

Joel Selwood vs Dayne Beams.

Beams

Hard to split. Look at your byes and that will give you the winner.

 

[Jiska]

Rebutting your point. It's a discussion.

Well, your question was can you have all three. Then you stated having all three was no problem. I'm trying to work out what exactly your trying to say

 

[Kadog]

Hard to split. Look at your byes and that will give you the winner.

**** the byes