2016 US Presidential Election - Trump vs Clinton? - Part 1

[Thrawn]

 

[JeffDunne]

Why would Trump start a nuclear war over, reasons unspecified? There has been a lot of fear mongering over Trump having access to nuclear codes. These fears are even more baseless than fears that hillary is gonna nuke someone.

I don't think anyone is claiming they know what Trump would do. That's the problem - he doesn't even know.

People fear the unintended consequences of his poorly thought out foreign policy (& that's being generous).

Trump is more likely to prioritise carving his head into Mount Rushmore than any serious foreign policy. What's troubling is he's likely to delegate that responsibility to the misfits he surrounds himself. Those idiots are capable of anything.

 

[bad setanta]

Watch Bill Maher get slaughtered Liberals. Exposed for the lightweight he is

 

[swingdog]

I don't think anyone is claiming they know what Trump would do. That's the problem - he doesn't even know.

People fear the unintended consequences of his poorly thought out foreign policy (& that's being generous).

Trump is more likely to prioritise carving his head into Mount Rushmore than any serious foreign policy. What's troubling is he's likely to delegate that responsibility to the misfits he surrounds himself. Those idiots are capable of anything.

Would be history repeating - Cheney and Rumsfeld railroading Bush.

 

[kirky]

I would still like you to answer my question if you have the time in between such insightful original posts

Is there anyway you can see Hillary winning the election that doesn't include voter fraud

Say what?

She we win fair and square - not like GWB in 2000!

 

[madmug]

He would be the richest person ever to hold the office, but spent the least to gain office in modern times. And the first in modern times not to be beholden to special interest groups, that's what makes him dangerous but the real danger is to the establishment. His main obligation will be to the people, they will be the ones who put him there.There will be a bond between him and the people not seen for a long time.

Given the latest polls, 'his' people are in the minority.
If Trump had a few more brains & & a lot less arrogance, he should have presented a more positive view of his vision of the future.
All he has done is lash out & made lots of BS accusations.
How could anyone vote for him with any confidence he would be sensible.

 

[happy_eagle]

Say what?

She we win fair and square - not like GWB in 2000!

Thats my point
Trump fans are only bringing up things like media bias and voter fraud now because they realise that Trump will lose "bigly" on November 8

 

[happy_eagle]

Watch Bill Maher get slaughtered Liberals. Exposed for the lightweight he is

Ann Coulter has become such a hack these days
She used to have a bit of creativity behind her trolling, but shes really dumbed it down for the alt-right lot.

 

[kirky]

Murdoch contributed to the Hillary campaign, make of that what you will. Not saying he's a leftie btw, but some things that appear to be right leaning aren't necessarily so.

Murdoch just like to back winners - heck he backed Rudd in 2007. It's about backing the winner.

 

[bad setanta]

Murdoch just like to back winners - heck he backed Rudd in 2007. It's about backing the winner.

If you believe that you'd believe anything. It's about maintaining the status quo.

 

[bad setanta]

Ann Coulter has become such a hack these days
She used to have a bit of creativity behind her trolling, but shes really dumbed it down for the alt-right lot.

No, all the other political pundits are the hacks, Ann was on the ball, notice the date.

 

[kirky]

If you believe that you'd believe anything. It's about maintaining the status quo.

Yep, Murdoch is slime and so is Trump.

 

[bad setanta]

Given the latest polls, 'his' people are in the minority.

Depends on which polls your looking at.

 

[happy_eagle]

Depends on which polls your looking at.

Its Poll, not polls

Unless you are of course referring to those online polls that had Trump winning every debate by 90%+

 

[funk44]

Its Poll, not polls

Unless you are of course referring to those online polls that had Trump winning every debate by 90%+

For those who are unaware as to why the LA Times poll an outlier, here is one of the many articles explaining why

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/u...-is-distorting-national-polling-averages.html

 

[bad setanta]

Ann Coulter has become such a hack these days
She used to have a bit of creativity behind her trolling, but shes really dumbed it down for the alt-right lot.

She's, if you want to be a pedantic **** I can too.

 

[Crankyhawk]

For a feminist she has killed an awful lot of women and girls.

I suspect the US voter doesn't really care about what happens to "dem foriegners" who dare to stand up against the forces of US service and resisting "our values and systems"

 

[Crankyhawk]

I know it's hard to believe people are so stupid they could vote for Hillary Clinton, I don't understand it either.

They will choose one fake or the other fake. Or not vote at all.

What happens if no one bothers to vote? Could be a worthwhile social media campaign "Stay home! Vote for non of thee above!"

 

[happy_eagle]

She's, if you want to be a pedantic **** I can too.

Sorry did I trigger you

 

[bad setanta]

Its Poll, not polls

Unless you are of course referring to those online polls that had Trump winning every debate by 90%+

I'd believe the Drudge poll before any of them.

 

[bad setanta]

Sorry did I trigger you

People in glass grammar houses shouldn't throw stones.

 

[happy_eagle]

People in glass grammar houses shouldn't throw stones.

I wasnt making fun of your grammar, you said that Trump was leading in many polls like there was more than one. I corrected you on that

I'd believe the Drudge poll before any of them.

Because it favours your blind obedience to Trump?

Find me some polls that are scientific, aren't biased towards a particular candidate (or mainstream media influenced) and have Trump winning the election

 

[awaremind]

They already have.

In Ukraine. Supported by whose administration?

 

[bad setanta]

Find me some polls that are scientific, aren't biased towards a particular candidate

I already did this morning. Go back and look.

 

[happy_eagle]

I already did this morning. Go back and look.

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...sively-skews-la-times-presidential-poll.shtml