Remove this Banner Ad

2017 trade/draft thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattyc75
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Respectfully, I can't see us trading two top ten picks for Gaff. I think we would've only done that for Josh Kelly.

Depends where you think you'll finish next season.

Kelly would have required a pick before 3 + another.
 
How would you guys feel about our future first being involved with a trade for Gaff?

I would not be at all interested in something that didn't help us immediately, so either 7 or 8 this year plus something else would IMO be required.


It would be counter productive for us to give you an A grade player that would help you rise up the ladder diminishing your future firsts value .

Bingo :thumbsu: well said , agree that would be a regressive , and indeed a counter productive move.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I would not be at all interested in something that didn't help us immediately, so either 7 or 8 this year plus something else would IMO be required.

No worries.

Thanks for the discussion guys. It will be interesting to see how this all pans out. Best of luck.
 
Would anyone do this trade?
North get: Gaff & Pick 13
WC get: Pick 4 & Pick 21 & Mountford
Going by the pick values that would put Gaff at somewhere between pick 6 and 7, and Mountford. Yeah, I'd do that. I don't think North would though.
 
Would anyone do this trade?
North get: Gaff & Pick 13
WC get: Pick 4 & Pick 21 & Mountford


Obviously depends on other offers but pick 4 lands a gun mid.

If we ended up with pick 7 or 8 and retain 13 that is also attractive.

Is pick 21 that big a difference to pick 13 is the key. Probably not.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Obviously depends on other offers but pick 4 lands a gun mid.

If we ended up with pick 7 or 8 and retain 13 that is also attractive.

Is pick 21 that big a difference to pick 13 is the key. Probably not.
I think at pick 13 we will have a couple of genuine midfielders of class to get. By 21, more flankers come mids.
 
Going by the pick values that would put Gaff at somewhere between pick 6 and 7, and Mountford. Yeah, I'd do that. I don't think North would though.

Obviously depends on other offers but pick 4 lands a gun mid.

If we ended up with pick 7 or 8 and retain 13 that is also attractive.

Is pick 21 that big a difference to pick 13 is the key. Probably not.
After mulling it over I think it probably needs something else going back North's way for them to say yes, particularly if Mountford is involved.
Agree that the pick 8 for Gaff is probably the ideal trade but there's rumours that the Saints are trying to use them to move up to pick 2. This give us a higher chance at a gun and also give us a couple of 2nd rounders to play with. I'd be much happier taking Kelly with a 2nd if we have 2 of them.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So that means we currently have 35 senior players (with decisions to come on Wellingham and Hill) and 3 Rookie List players (with all 3 remaining players being out of contract).
We must have a list of 44 (38-40 seniors + 4-6 rookies) so unless we land a couple of free agents we'll likely be looking at a minimum of 6 draftees this year, although Watson is likely to be elevated to the Cat A rookie list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom