- Feb 2, 2016
- 8,349
- 14,569
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I mean theres a reason hibberd, laird and fyfe are in every teamSo i decided to put together a team with a cookie-cutter structure but with different premiums to the norm. Im hoping to show that you can still select a good team without following the group think. As such ive left out Laird/Hibberd/Savage/Sicily/Fyfe/Heeney/Billings etc
17k leftover
View attachment 470103
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
full 22 for that silly kent of a GC/Paer bye.So ryder is back in most teams. Is It still best 18
People expecting a breakout year. Fitter, more midfield minutes, a bit of a bull. Also as pick 2 out to show that he is better than McCartin!Whats with petracca being in so many teams?
Personally if you are intent on spending the $200k I would flick Naughton for Brayshaw of the Melbourne variety.Ive got 200k spare. Any advice on where to spend it? Its not enough to upgrade a mid rookie and I don't really want a premium at F5. I guess i could keep it as a danger fund but I dont like having 200k sitting there
View attachment 470193
They tease you with 1 out of 3, hoping the article sparks your interest in signing up .......Surprised they put this up as a PDF and not behind a paywall.
Expectation is that he will pretty much become a FT mid this year.Whats with petracca being in so many teams?
Never averaged over 101 and nearly 28yo. What makes you think he would average better than that this year? Most players reach their scoring potential at 22. He's 6 years past that.I think Brad Ebert is a Cash cow who racks up lots of points, worth 550 k
Ryder has the R10 Bye .....but you have a Port player as your R3 (coverage ? )Going to stick with this until teams released. 4.4K left. Happy with the structure, and will downgrade Kelly to another Mid as a cashgrab if required.
Going very deep in the mids, but have the cash with no Danger, and I don't trust any of the expensive forwards.
View attachment 470055
WOW ......you've really thought that thru haven't you ?My Danger plans:
- Scenario 1: if he is named, pick him
- Scenario 2: if he is isn't but it seems highly likely he will play in round 2), then loophole Martin and Banfield, and pick him anyway if they do well. If Banfield/Martin don't do well, then I'd probably go with no Danger and bring in Mitchell.
- Scenario 3: he is a late out, and martin/banfield dont do well, then pick oliver
- Scenario 4: if there is a decent chance he will miss round 2 then don't pick him, and plan to get him round 5ish.
Loophole plans:
- maybe use danger under scenario 2-3
- pick darcy cameron even if he isn't named
- probably go with 30 in round one otherwise
Scenario 1-3 team, $15,600 left over
View attachment 470100
Scenario 4 team, $23,9k left over
View attachment 470101
Get rid of Bell .....put Sicily down at F5 ....shift Keefe to DEF .....get another D3 (Savage, Lloyd ect) .....that'll be great thenIve got 200k spare. Any advice on where to spend it? Its not enough to upgrade a mid rookie and I don't really want a premium at F5. I guess i could keep it as a danger fund but I dont like having 200k sitting there
View attachment 470193
It's a secret, can't tell you ......only a select # have been advisedWhats with petracca being in so many teams?
Don't think Cameron will get consistent enough games to be useful coverage. Went for a Ruck/FWD with DPP, and will trade in Cox at some stage as ruck cover. Will be the best option imo for floating cover at F7/R3.Ryder has the R10 Bye .....but you have a Port player as your R3 (coverage ? )
If you MUST have Bell (must be related to him) ......PLEASE not at D4 !
TOO MUCH money sitting on your bench ......not SC good enough to play on-field IMODon't think Cameron will get consistent enough games to be useful coverage. Went for a Ruck/FWD with DPP, and will trade in Cox at some stage as ruck cover. Will be the best option imo for floating cover at F7/R3.
It;s a really good side, until i got to the FWD's .....having 3 rookies on-field will bring you undone, just not strong or consistent enoughView attachment 470233
got $126k left over. got a couple backups in mind for round 1 omissions for the rookies, fairly happy with the premos. was toying around with the backline a bit tonight, but hopefully i'll leave it like this until the teams are announced (probs not haha).
I'd downgrade shaw and trade in an F4 and only go with 1 of Armitage/ConiglioView attachment 470235 Made a few changes, just brought in Savage and Armitage. Am I reading too far into JLT form?
Garlett more or less a place holder for the time being.
Any advice appreciated.
Ryder has the R10 Bye .....but you have a Port player as your R3 (coverage ? )
If you MUST have Bell (must be related to him) ......PLEASE not at D4 !
Love the mids!View attachment 470233
got $126k left over. got a couple backups in mind for round 1 omissions for the rookies, fairly happy with the premos. was toying around with the backline a bit tonight, but hopefully i'll leave it like this until the teams are announced (probs not haha).