Next
and do Avery's stats flatter his ability...or is he a very good prospect?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Western Bulldogs v Adelaide - Rd 14 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Dogs at 60% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games
Next
25-50 and more likely towards the 50 from what most on here say. Twomey says there is some interest early though so you never know.It wasn’t the game that Western would’ve been hoping for but does it affect his draft? Where does the bid come?
Doubt it, thought he was still good and it was a pretty typical Western game anyway. Fast, clean and slick hands with a bit of dash and kicking hit and miss. Wouldn’t have risen or fallen I don’t thinkIt wasn’t the game that Western would’ve been hoping for but does it affect his draft? Where does the bid come?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
List sizes might hurt him getting an opportunity. Can see him being solid at League level and eventually getting an opportunity - seems to have a really good work ethic. I always reference examples like Banfield -> carves it up as an inside mid at WAFL level but at AFL level... ummm.AFL recruiters would be stark raving mad not to give Vanirsen an opportunity on an AFL list.
and do Avery's stats flatter his ability...or is he a very good prospect?
[/QUOTE
Seems a rookie possibility to me as he shows something but has a fair bit to work on. Decision-making being the main thing and iirc his kicking wasn't great. Pretty poor performance, overall, by Claremont so it may have made him look worse than he is.
List sizes might hurt him getting an opportunity. Can see him being solid at League level and eventually getting an opportunity - seems to have a really good work ethic. I always reference examples like Banfield -> carves it up as an inside mid at WAFL level but at AFL level... ummm.
Haven’t heard much about the kid at all. But I love the sound of a footballer who doesnt have great athleticism as opposed to the opposite. Paul Hazelby was a lot like that. Duffield also. He might be worth a rookie spot no?I get what you’re saying but don’t think Banfield is a good example to use. Vanirsen is a footballer, Banfield isn’t.
Vanirsen seems to have it all bar elite athleticism. He’d be great depth at the very least imo.
I've seen a lot of Lachie Vanirsen over the years in juniors and now in colts. He's a leader who lifts himself to whatever level of footy he's playing at. Banfield could only dream about kicking the footy like Lachie.I get what you’re saying but don’t think Banfield is a good example to use. Vanirsen is a footballer, Banfield isn’t.
Vanirsen seems to have it all bar elite athleticism. He’d be great depth at the very least imo.
I possibly should have used another example but I still think people forget Banfield as a 19yo winning Claremont's B&F (at League level, not Colts) and are now judging him based on how he has performed at AFL level in that half forward role that countless footy careers have gone to dieI get what you’re saying but don’t think Banfield is a good example to use. Vanirsen is a footballer, Banfield isn’t.
Vanirsen seems to have it all bar elite athleticism. He’d be great depth at the very least imo.
They've also forgotten the plaudits he got in that tagging role Ross used him in.Haven’t heard much about the kid at all. But I love the sound of a footballer who doesnt have great athleticism as opposed to the opposite. Paul Hazelby was a lot like that. Duffield also. He might be worth a rookie spot no?
I get what you’re saying but don’t think Banfield is a good example to use. Vanirsen is a footballer, Banfield isn’t.
Vanirsen seems to have it all bar elite athleticism. He’d be great depth at the very least imo.
That’s says a lot about the state of the game of AFL footy then doesn’t it. Athletes are evidently more effective than footballers at generating team success at AFL level.What happens with AFL drafting is cut throat and arguably unfair Scham, but Varnirsen didn't even get a combine invite even with the last minute extra invites, so I think it is highly unlikely he even gets drafted (the stats on non-combine invites getting drafted are really very poor). Chris Walker who is an athlete more than a footballer is more likely to get drafted, which I get is not fair on those who are footballers; that is just the way it is.
Posters here rave about Freddy and whinge about athletes over footballers in the same breath.
Fully agree.Wouldn’t it be nice if we could have both!
Footballers will always find the pigskin.
Athletes have the potential to sometimes find it faster.
I think that Freddy showed a good knack of finding the ball this season. He got into a lot of decent positions, suggesting a reasonable level of footy smarts. He was very fumbly at times but that will be an easy fix with time and maturity, I would hope. To me it’s the decision making of Mundy with ball in hand that is such a valuable trait at AFL level, and also a very hard trait to pick out when drafting kids. Serong seems to have the potential to be Mundy-like in his ball use under pressure in the midfield which is really promising. It’s hard to find guys like that.Posters here rave about Freddy and whinge about athletes over footballers in the same breath.
What happens with AFL drafting is cut throat and arguably unfair Scham, but Varnirsen didn't even get a combine invite even with the last minute extra invites, so I think it is highly unlikely he even gets drafted (the stats on non-combine invites getting drafted are really very poor). Chris Walker who is an athlete more than a footballer is more likely to get drafted, which I get is not fair on those who are footballers; that is just the way it is.
All of those players have some elite traits that can be useful onfield. For Frederick it is speed, for Mundy and Serong a comparative lack of speed is somewhat nullified by a bundle of things we'd call footy smarts. I think the athletes can and do bridge the footy smarts divide quite often, but when it fails it's embarrassing.I think that Freddy showed a good knack of finding the ball this season. He got into a lot of decent positions, suggesting a reasonable level of footy smarts. He was very fumbly at times but that will be an easy fix with time and maturity, I would hope. To me it’s the decision making of Mundy with ball in hand that is such a valuable trait at AFL level, and also a very hard trait to pick out when drafting kids. Serong seems to have the potential to be Mundy-like in his ball use under pressure in the midfield which is really promising. It’s hard to find guys like that.
I am hoping Frederick can improve his footskills. He looks like he has pretty good basic ability but is a bit inconsistent. Simplifying the thought process may allow him to have a bit more time. Love to have both Sturt and Henry being dangerous from 50+If you're getting drafted in the later rounds or through the rookie draft, you clearly have a identifiable weakness in your game and clubs will be able to identify what they have had success with in the past in what they can improve in those players.
A player that is defensively or structurally inexperienced can be taught fundamentals that they necessarily didn't have as a junior. Work-rate & stamina is another clubs can train into players... take Walters for example. He was ranked very highly by some scouts/pundits, I think Emma Quayle had him top 10? But his footspeed and work-rate were a defined weakness, but we managed to work on his stamina. JLO has consistently said about Frederick this season that he just needs to learn patterns, game-plans and structures, which are attributes that the club clearly feels they can build into him.
Kicking, foot speed, decision making and contested marking are skills that can only be improved marginally.
Is that you Ross?If you're getting drafted in the later rounds or through the rookie draft, you clearly have a identifiable weakness in your game and clubs will be able to identify what they have had success with in the past in what they can improve in those players.
A player that is defensively or structurally inexperienced can be taught fundamentals that they necessarily didn't have as a junior. Work-rate & stamina is another clubs can train into players... take Walters for example. He was ranked very highly by some scouts/pundits, I think Emma Quayle had him top 10? But his footspeed and work-rate were a defined weakness, but we managed to work on his stamina. JLO has consistently said about Frederick this season that he just needs to learn patterns, game-plans and structures, which are attributes that the club clearly feels they can build into him.
Kicking, foot speed, decision making and contested marking are skills that can only be improved marginally.
Is that you Ross?