AFL 2021 AFL Round 8

Remove this Banner Ad

GROTTO

Hall of Famer
Jul 5, 2013
49,956
59,520
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
NP's Bet of the Week:

Not many occasions this year there has been something jumping out at me, for the most part prop markets have been super tight. But, there is great value in Ben Cunnington this week.
30+ $3.10
35+ $8.50
40+ $31
All on SB

Collingwood midfield is just flat out soft, continuing to give up huge disposal numbers. Recent weeks they have given up 35 to Ellis & 34 to Miller. 42 to Parish & 34 to Merrett, 38 to Gaff & 37 to Redden, 37 to Ward & 34 to Taranto. Just absolutely no midfield accountability whatsoever. Cunnington will run amok. Off the back of 35 against a far superior Melbourne midfield and the last time he played the Pies he collected 37. This is a fill up
Thats really well researched, definitely feels like overs given the data you have provided. :thumbsu:

Lets not forget that Pies midfield last time had Treloar.



:)
 

GROTTO

Hall of Famer
Jul 5, 2013
49,956
59,520
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I think on fox footy there was some stat that in 66 games since 2000ish cant remember the year out of 66 games that met the criteria based on stats only once did the dominating team not win. That was the Cats on Saturday.
Thanks for that feel vindicated and justified with the comment earlier that the Cats win that game v Sydney 9/10 based on that stat you provided its probably 9.9/10 lol
 

GROTTO

Hall of Famer
Jul 5, 2013
49,956
59,520
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Apologies for asking this question again, but if you included the Lions to win in a multi (with other teams to win not a SGM) is the multi voided or just the one leg of the multi.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

SM

Bigfooty Legend
Aug 3, 2008
104,174
65,293
North Shore
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Hull City, Adelaide United, EH
From memory twice in same year tiges beat bris by 40+ both times after bris had more disposals, contested, clearances and scoring shots. It's how u burn teams on the turnover.
Yep. There's a reason we were so accurate, it was about where the scoring shots came from. No coincidence all of Bombers, GWS and Cats have come away with awful conversion rates from the SCG.
 

iluvparis

Import Whisperer
Apr 1, 2005
40,286
33,167
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Calgary Flames, Man Utd
Yep. There's a reason we were so accurate, it was about where the scoring shots came from. No coincidence all of Bombers, GWS and Cats have come away with awful conversion rates from the SCG.
Relative accuracy from game to game is almost always pure variance
 

Kiddbrown

Debutant
Apr 13, 2016
57
68
AFL Club
Adelaide
NP's Bet of the Week:

Not many occasions this year there has been something jumping out at me, for the most part prop markets have been super tight. But, there is great value in Ben Cunnington this week.
30+ $3.10
35+ $8.50
40+ $31
All on SB

Collingwood midfield is just flat out soft, continuing to give up huge disposal numbers. Recent weeks they have given up 35 to Ellis & 34 to Miller. 42 to Parish & 34 to Merrett, 38 to Gaff & 37 to Redden, 37 to Ward & 34 to Taranto. Just absolutely no midfield accountability whatsoever. Cunnington will run amok. Off the back of 35 against a far superior Melbourne midfield and the last time he played the Pies he collected 37. This is a fill up
Really like this
Could also throw jy simpkin in the mix at slightly better odds
Even $1.80 for 25+Sb
$4/$13/$81 for 30/35/40 on tab
 

Sausage Legs

All Australian
Sep 17, 2014
966
981
AFL Club
West Coast
NP's Bet of the Week:

Not many occasions this year there has been something jumping out at me, for the most part prop markets have been super tight. But, there is great value in Ben Cunnington this week.
30+ $3.10
35+ $8.50
40+ $31
All on SB

Collingwood midfield is just flat out soft, continuing to give up huge disposal numbers. Recent weeks they have given up 35 to Ellis & 34 to Miller. 42 to Parish & 34 to Merrett, 38 to Gaff & 37 to Redden, 37 to Ward & 34 to Taranto. Just absolutely no midfield accountability whatsoever. Cunnington will run amok. Off the back of 35 against a far superior Melbourne midfield and the last time he played the Pies he collected 37. This is a fill up
Similar boat. Pies give up a heap across half back. Aaron Hall is 3.75 for 30 and 11s for 35 on pointsbet. Take away his concussion and he's getting these digits already.
 

SM

Bigfooty Legend
Aug 3, 2008
104,174
65,293
North Shore
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Hull City, Adelaide United, EH
Swans also kicked 11.17 against Essendon there - it was an absurdly homer call from SM as always.
Wasn't sure how long it would take for the cheap shots to come out.

What does our accuracy have to do with things when my point was about our opponent on the night? Your initial point about the Cats deserving to win centred around how many more scoring shots they had did it not?

This is such a painful discussion started by you asserting the Swans had fallen off some sort of cliff in the last two weeks.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

iluvparis

Import Whisperer
Apr 1, 2005
40,286
33,167
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
Calgary Flames, Man Utd
What does our accuracy have to do with things when my point was about our opponent on the night? Your initial point about the Cats deserving to win centred around how many more scoring shots they had did it not?
Yes

I've just told you game to game accuracy is pure variance

You should be able to find the correct conclusion from there.
 

GROTTO

Hall of Famer
Jul 5, 2013
49,956
59,520
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You say with absolutely zero previous interaction with me. I tipped against us against the Giants and GCS, was that team bias too?
This is a discussion.

Im not fighting with you I just believe you have team bias. Im comfortable in sticking to my original assertion that Cats win 9/10 v Swans, couple that wih the Fox Footy data one loss from 66 games winning the stats and Cameron mark and its a reasonable call, from a neutral perspective.

I have admitted myself I suffer at times in the past with the team bias. Youre taking this too personally.
 

SM

Bigfooty Legend
Aug 3, 2008
104,174
65,293
North Shore
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Hull City, Adelaide United, EH
This is a discussion.

Im not fighting with you I just believe you have team bias. Im comfortable in sticking to my original assertion that Cats win 9/10 v Swans, couple that wih the Fox Footy data one loss from 66 games winning the stats and Cameron mark and its a reasonable call, from a neutral perspective.

I have admitted myself I suffer at times in the past with the team bias. Youre taking this too personally.
My assertion was around value in the Melbourne game, you've claimed I'm approaching it subjectively, how do I take it other than you commenting on my ability to think rationally?

I don't know how this has come back around yet again, we're all set in our positions, there's nothing to be gained here.
 

GROTTO

Hall of Famer
Jul 5, 2013
49,956
59,520
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
My assertion was around value in the Melbourne game, you've claimed I'm approaching it subjectively, how do I take it other than you commenting on my ability to think rationally?

I don't know how this has come back around yet again, we're all set in our positions, there's nothing to be gained here.
Yes I am commenting on your ability to think rationally, because youre being blind to your team bias and taking umbrage with any negative view of them without carefully reading my posts.

I actually stated "I dont disagree with you that Swans SU is a wild bet, I never said it was. In fact I agreed with one poster on here that the Swans should cover the line."

Youre actually blowing this out of proportion and the bigger issue is that it than makes people not offer their viewpoints on a bet or market without fear of attack.

Also for the record, I made a similar comment to iluvparis about his selection of the Tigers to beat Port. It didnt lead to an argument on here.
 

SM

Bigfooty Legend
Aug 3, 2008
104,174
65,293
North Shore
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Hull City, Adelaide United, EH
Yes I am commenting on your ability to think rationally, because youre being blind to your team bias and taking umbrage with any negative view of them without carefully reading my posts.

I actually stated "I dont disagree with you that Swans SU is a wild bet, I never said it was. In fact I agreed with one poster on here that the Swans should cover the line."

Youre actually blowing this out of proportion and the bigger issue is that it than makes people not offer their viewpoints on a bet or market without fear of attack.

Also for the record, I made a similar comment to iluvparis about his selection of the Tigers to beat Port. It didnt lead to an argument on here.
I think you're being a bit ridiculous making the above comments and then being surprised when I take something personally.

If you agree with me then what are we even discussing? Move on.
 

GROTTO

Hall of Famer
Jul 5, 2013
49,956
59,520
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I think you're being a bit ridiculous making the above comments and then being surprised when I take something personally.

If you agree with me then what are we even discussing? Move on.
If you recall I said I wish the Dees were playing a better side than the Swans.

That seemed to upset you, Im sorry I hurt your feelings.
 

GROTTO

Hall of Famer
Jul 5, 2013
49,956
59,520
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
If you need to point out who a bloke supports as your argument then your argument is sh*t
So what youre saying that home selection bias does not exist? Youre actually talking sh*t now yourself, because it does.
 

Remove this Banner Ad