Art Vandelay_
OhhYessssss
- Oct 28, 2012
- 115,090
- 163,382
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers - Tottenham
I work with people who as part time/casuals on 20 ish hours a week, and while as mostly young girls living at home taking home around $500 a week is more than enough for them as non-renters if Newstart was at the poverty line then they may opt for that $457 a week and that position now lays vacant, and a renter I doubt would be keen on it.I agree it is definitely a bi-partisan issue and IMO payments should increase in line with inflation. However, it's frustrating that the payment is a mile below the poverty line. In Australia, Jobseeker is currently $565.70 a fortnight without the Covid supplement for a single adult with no dependents, and will be increasing to $615.70 a fortnight beginning in April, or roughly $44 a day. The poverty line is considered to be $457 A WEEK, or roughly $65 a day.
Therein lies the issue IMO. Maybe it does need a bigger increase, as expensive as that may be, but can't be anywhere near what the lowest earners get as they'd just take the dole and menial tasks and roles that minimum wage earners do get left undone. And, I don't think it is as simple as saying 'raise the wages' for these tasks. They are priced according to the skill involved and the demand for the service, as well as the net benefit they bring. Raise the wages of those people performing these menial tasks and it quickly becomes unviable for businesses. A balance that I don't think government, industry or employers will ever agree on. And will forever go unfixed.
We also make it very easy for the bludgers to get these payments long term, whereas it appears other OECD nations make it much harder and put short term caps on time you can receive payments, and there is not enough scrutiny and checks in place on 'search efforts' here to go along with the ease of long term access.I have no problem paying some extra tax for those on Newstart, and especially for those on the aged pension.
That is just ridiculous what they get paid.
The work programs long term unemployed get put into is just a PR exercise by government so they can tell the tax payer that long term unemployed are being made to 'work' for their dole money. But the reality is that these people are just shoved into NFP organisations or fill the cracks in the minimum wage sector and do menial tasks that no one could be paid to do as there is no money to be made. All the while these providers receive $$$ to take in these dole recipients.
So sorry but I have a big problem with substantive increases to unemployment benefits. They deserve to be kept as low as they can be.
The sad reality of life is that not everyone will have a job. There is no country that has zero unemployment. The sad reality of the 21st century Australian landscape is that there is a real requirement for people to learn a skill. We have been moving away from a manufacturing based economy towards a service based economy for decades. Trades, diplomas are the way to go. But our Newstart work programs and education schemes don't do this, they allow for basic education courses from TAFE's like retail, social work etc which either lead to unskilled labour (retail) or require further studies to get a meaningful job out of. Which brings us back full circle to needing a skill in 21st century Australia.
Fully in agreement that disability (permanent) and the age pension need a serious review. The elderly and those who can't work should be looked after to an extent that they can live comfortably. Not have money troubles that cause them to skip meals or not turn on the heat in winter/air con in summer (especially for the elderly). Fully sympathise with them and have no issues if they got quite a bit more. Comfortable retirement is something we all strive for and if done well can be well propped up by our super, but our current generation of elderly didn't have compulsory super for their whole working lives so should be well looked after IMO.




Your answers matched the employer’s preferences.