List Mgmt. 2022 AFL Draft & Rookie Draft

[Aphrodite]

 

[Coona Blues]

No need to draft for wings this year.

We have a OBrien, Cottrel as back up and would look at training Carrol for that role next year.

We will get the 2 Campo’s next year.

We need a forward / mid who is damaging and can updgrade Owies! Honey role.

The rest of the draft should see a focus on developing KP stocks.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

The Camporeale boys are two years away. If the nominate father/ son and if their trajectory continues. Then they have to develop sufficiently to theoretically be a part of a premiership team.

If Vossy remains reluctant to use Walsh on a wing or repurpose other players Doc, Kemp, Carroll we need to address wing options.

I like Acres (and Sholl) and would not complain if we acquire him/them, but I do believe we have players to fill the role(s) already on the list IF we “tweak” the game plan. It is why I like Hollands in the draft, could start on a wing for a year or three and progress in to the middle when we get vacancies.

No denying an x-factor mid size forward to be a nice option, but mid forward connection and two way running remains a higher priority for me.

Shaping like we are keeping McDonald and S.Durdin who complement Weiters and Young just fine in defence for the next few years. With McGovern, Marchbank and Kemp as third talls, we are covered in defence. Note: If OMac is retained, I am confident his issues are resolved (reference C.Curnow)

We need a developing key forward (or two) from this draft. To kill two birds with one stone, so to speak, there are multiple potential draftees who could also assist in the ruck to varying degrees Keeler, Northam, Foster and a handful of others at various likely levels of the draft. It doesn’t need to come from the first round, we don’t need generation next (although it would be nice), depth is the major need, and a viable target structurally in the seconds.

 

[Gointocarlton]

The Camporeale boys are two years away. If the nominate father/ son and if their trajectory continues. Then they have to develop sufficiently to theoretically be a part of a premiership team.

If Vossy remains reluctant to use Walsh on a wing or repurpose other players Doc, Kemp, Carroll we need to address wing options.

I like Acres (and Sholl) and would not complain if we acquire him/them, but I do believe we have players to fill the role(s) already on the list IF we “tweak” the game plan. It is why I like Hollands in the draft, could start on a wing for a year or three and progress in to the middle when we get vacancies.

No denying an x-factor mid size forward to be a nice option, but mid forward connection and two way running remains a higher priority for me.

Shaping like we are keeping McDonald and S.Durdin who complement Weiters and Young just fine in defence for the next few years. With McGovern, Marchbank and Kemp as third talls, we are covered in defence. Note: If OMac is retained, I am confident his issues are resolved (reference C.Curnow)

We need a developing key forward (or two) from this draft. To kill two birds with one stone, so to speak, there are multiple potential draftees who could also assist in the ruck to varying degrees Keeler, Northam, Foster and a handful of others at various likely levels of the draft. It doesn’t need to come from the first round, we don’t need generation next (although it would be nice), depth is the major need, and a viable target structurally in the seconds.

OMac was delisted today with Newnes and Parks

 

[Coona Blues]

OMac was delisted today with Newnes and Parks

Well aren’t you clever. The post was written prior, we are all aware now, so what is your point?

 

[Gointocarlton]

Well aren’t you clever. The post was written prior, we are all aware now, so what is your point?

Nothing, sorry.

 

[windows1]

What do you think we could offer to get pick 5 or 7

Plowman?

 

[BlackGoanna]

The Camporeale boys are two years away. If the nominate father/ son and if their trajectory continues. Then they have to develop sufficiently to theoretically be a part of a premiership team.

If Vossy remains reluctant to use Walsh on a wing or repurpose other players Doc, Kemp, Carroll we need to address wing options.

I like Acres (and Sholl) and would not complain if we acquire him/them, but I do believe we have players to fill the role(s) already on the list IF we “tweak” the game plan. It is why I like Hollands in the draft, could start on a wing for a year or three and progress in to the middle when we get vacancies.

No denying an x-factor mid size forward to be a nice option, but mid forward connection and two way running remains a higher priority for me.

Shaping like we are keeping McDonald and S.Durdin who complement Weiters and Young just fine in defence for the next few years. With McGovern, Marchbank and Kemp as third talls, we are covered in defence. Note: If OMac is retained, I am confident his issues are resolved (reference C.Curnow)

We need a developing key forward (or two) from this draft. To kill two birds with one stone, so to speak, there are multiple potential draftees who could also assist in the ruck to varying degrees Keeler, Northam, Foster and a handful of others at various likely levels of the draft. It doesn’t need to come from the first round, we don’t need generation next (although it would be nice), depth is the major need, and a viable target structurally in the seconds.

Ok got it. They are 2 years away. I still think we can train Carrol on a wing next year and we still have OBrien and Cottrel who have both improved. If we draft a midfielder they need to have a strong running capacity to start out on a wing.

I still think our gaps are medium forward and key position stocks.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[The Bighouse]

Ok got it. They are 2 years away. I still think we can train Carrol on a wing next year and we still have OBrien and Cottrel who have both improved. If we draft a midfielder they need to have a strong running capacity to start out on a wing.

I still think our gaps are medium forward and key position stocks.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Ollie Henry wouldn’t go astray up forward.

 

[carlton_99]

 

[Juice030103]

View attachment 1492366

I was warming to him as our pick but I don’t want another injury prone player so pass on him.

Wish him well

 

[GT619]

View attachment 1492366

Beat me too it

 

[Stamos]

Might come cheaper I suppose.

 

[Blue__Balls]

Smells like a SOS special...

With Pick 28, Carlton select.....Brayden George.

 

[Magical_EddieBetts]

Damn I really wanted Brayden George with our first pick

 

[ferrisb]

Damn I really wanted Brayden George with our first pick

Now I want him with our second pick...

 

[Magical_EddieBetts]

Now I want him with our second pick...

 

[Michael Jezz]

Plowman?

10 and 1 of kemp/mcgovern for 5 and 2nd rounder

 

[katmanblue]

View attachment 1492366

Does that meant we can get him at our 2nd?

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[katmanblue]

10 and 1 of kemp/mcgovern for 5 and 2nd rounder

Why? Who are you targetting with 5? Would have to be exceptional.

I'd rather keep both then take best available at 10.

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Michael Jezz]

Why? Who are you targetting with 5? Would have to be exceptional.

I'd rather keep both then take best available at 10.

On SM-F926B using BigFooty.com mobile app

The deal is based on the premise that the player @ 5 is a level up from the player @ 10. Is Sheezel more suitable and superior than those on offer @ 10

 

[GT619]

The deal is based on the premise that the player @ 5 is a level up from the player @ 10. Is Sheezel more suitable and superior than those on offer @ 10

U saying we could jump high in the draft potentially

 

[ferrisb]

Fo Sheezel!

 

[Michael Jezz]

U saying we could jump high in the draft potentially

I answered a question by arrow. I have no idea what carlton, could do

 

[Bletch]

For the sake of argument, let's play this out a bit...

Say Gov wants to go home to Adelaide, and Adelaide are keen to have him back. If you were Adelaide, would you take 10 & Gov for 5? (forget the 2nd round back, that's not gonna happen) I'm dubious, but ok, say they accept the deal. We've now got pick 5. This becomes pick 6 when Ashcroft gets picked (likely 1, certainly by 2).

We won't get Sheezel, and probably unlikely to get Tsatas, they're the two I'd love to have got by shifting up the order, but don't see it happening. Wardlaw likely also off the table, hard to say how far he drops after injuries, but unlikely to be out of the top 5.

Busslinger might be there, and slots straight into the role Gov had, longer term likely to fill a key defender role.

If he's not, then it's the likes of Clark, Phillipou, Mackenzie, Hewett, or for a tall option Cadman. All look likely prospects, but there's a decent chance one of these would have been available at our pick 10 anyway.

My feeling is that there isn't likely to be a huge difference between 5 and 10 - the players we'd really be keen on will be off the table, all we get is first choice of the next group (which would be great to have by the way, but not worth paying a big price for). Also, I think we'd have to pay a lot more for the pick swap than what is mooted. And if we were going to be paying a high price I'd want it to be to WC or GWS for a really good result.

 

[Coona Blues]

For the sake of argument, let's play this out a bit...

Say Gov wants to go home to Adelaide, and Adelaide are keen to have him back. If you were Adelaide, would you take 10 & Gov for 5? (forget the 2nd round back, that's not gonna happen) I'm dubious, but ok, say they accept the deal. We've now got pick 5. This becomes pick 6 when Ashcroft gets picked (likely 1, certainly by 2).

We won't get Sheezel, and probably unlikely to get Tsatas, they're the two I'd love to have got by shifting up the order, but don't see it happening. Wardlaw likely also off the table, hard to say how far he drops after injuries, but unlikely to be out of the top 5.

Busslinger might be there, and slots straight into the role Gov had, longer term likely to fill a key defender role.

If he's not, then it's the likes of Clark, Phillipou, Mackenzie, Hewett, or for a tall option Cadman. All look likely prospects, but there's a decent chance one of these would have been available at our pick 10 anyway.

My feeling is that there isn't likely to be a huge difference between 5 and 10 - the players we'd really be keen on will be off the table, all we get is first choice of the next group (which would be great to have by the way, but not worth paying a big price for). Also, I think we'd have to pay a lot more for the pick swap than what is mooted. And if we were going to be paying a high price I'd want it to be to WC or GWS for a really good result.

Thinking Gold Coast would be upset not getting #5 for Rankine

 

[Bletch]

Thinking Gold Coast would be upset not getting #5 for Rankine

For sure. It's not gonna happen.