List Mgmt. 2022 Trade & List Management Thread II

[giantroo]

Spoiler: Confirmed Trades

Spoiler: Draft Pick order

AFL Draft - AFL.com.au

Australian Football League. All the latest AFL news, video, results and information

www.afl.com.au

Spoiler: Key dates

AFL Trade Period Key Dates - AFL.com.au

When does Free Agency begin? How long does the Trade Period go for? Find out on AFL.com.au.

www.afl.com.au

Key Dates:

Friday 07 October at 5.00pm
Close of AFL Restricted Free Agency Offer and Unrestricted Free Agency Period.

Monday 10 October
NAB AFL Draft Nominations open (9am)
AFL Restricted Free Agency Matching Offer 3 Day Period Ends (5pm)

Wednesday 12 October at 7.30pm
AFL Trade Period closes – players and selections


Thursday 03 November at 9.00am
AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (1) commences

Wednesday 09 November at 5.00pm

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (1) closes

Friday 11 November at 9.00am

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (2) commences

Tuesday 15 November by 5.00pm

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (2) closes
AFL Trade Period closes – selections only

Monday 21 November by 3.00pm

NAB AFL Draft Nominations close

Monday 28 November at 7.10pm

2022 NAB AFL Draft Round One (Venue TBC)

Father/Son, Academy & NGA and Players Bidding opens.

Tuesday 29 November

AFL Trade Period – selections only (5.45pm to 6.30pm)

2022 NAB AFL National Draft Round two until completion (7pm)

Rookie Upgrade Period opens (10pm)

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (3) commences (10pm)

Rookie Upgrade Period closes (11pm)

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (3) closes (11pm)

Wednesday 30 November

NAB AFL Pre-Season Draft (3pm, online)
NAB AFL Rookie Draft (3.20pm, online)

Thursday 01 December by 4.00pm

Final AFL Club List Lodgement

 

[King Corey]

2. Logue wants September off, would be my guess. Could be wrong of course.

North Melbourne Powerpoint Presentation:

• 4 extra weeks of annual leave per year
• Outstanding wellness program
• Comfortable inclusive fitness program
• Round 1 annual bye

 

[King Corey]

Who are we going to get for leadership now?

#SorryBucky

 

[DesertRoo]

North Melbourne Powerpoint Presentation:

• 4 extra weeks of annual leave per year
• Outstanding wellness program
• Comfortable inclusive fitness program
• Round 1 annual bye

We’ve also got a no body shaming policy.
And hand out participation awards, everyone’s a winner when you play here.

 

[KickItAnywhere34]

Depends how bad we want tucker I guess....I doubt freo will do a deal for him seperate and before the logue deal just incase we try and walk logue. They kinda have us by the balls.

Possibly but Tucker is contracted and happy to stay so if they try for overs we say thanks but no thanks to Tucker and we walk Logue. I’m not sure the interest in Tucker is as high as we think.

 

[Passmore]

North Melbourne Powerpoint Presentation:

• 4 extra weeks of annual leave per year
• Outstanding wellness program
• Comfortable inclusive fitness program
• Round 1 annual bye

What about “property portfolio management “? Or did Brad take that with him?

 

[Passmore]

Depends how bad we want tucker I guess....I doubt freo will do a deal for him seperate and before the logue deal just incase we try and walk logue. They kinda have us by the balls.

Hard to see us backing ourselves into a corner for Darcy Tucker.

 

[Footywizard]

Hard to see us backing ourselves into a corner for Darcy Tucker.

Yeah agree...was just an observation. id still be happy to use that future 2nd in a logue deal and keep the PSD option open for something else that may pop up.

 

[DesertRoo]

Yeah agree...was just an observation. id still be happy to use that future 2nd in a logue deal and keep the PSD option open for something else that may pop up.

The two in the PSD I’ve got my eyes on of the deals falling over are Rioli and B.Hill both would slot straight into our team nicely.

 

[The Nostradamus]

The two in the PSD I’ve got my eyes on of the deals falling over are Rioli and B.Hill both would slot straight into our team nicely.

Dream bigger
Taranto or rankine deals fall over

 

[DesertRoo]

Dream bigger
Taranto or rankine deals fall over

Yep and we should rightly take the best player available.

 

[New_Roo]

Yep and we should rightly take the best player available.

And it can't be Hill as he is contracted


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Roo Beauty]

We wouldn’t take either of them because they don’t want to play for North.

 

[Psicosis]

Depends how bad we want tucker I guess....I doubt freo will do a deal for him seperate and before the logue deal just incase we try and walk logue. They kinda have us by the balls.

Tucker has to do a medical with us. It's not a sure thing, let alone something that we will let get in the way of the Logue trade*

*The most important trade of our off season considering age, need, talent

 

[AnEmptyChair]

I wish the ITK posters would stop blowing threads up with information I could only find here because it means that I have to scroll past them all to get to trade hypotheticals written by soccer fans that totally ignore the history of AFL trades and drafting.

I don't know mate, I feel like my hypothetical is more likely than the idea we're going to get Logue for a future 3rd or we're going to 'walk' him to the psd

 

[Footywizard]

Dream bigger
Taranto or rankine deals fall over

Rankine deal falling over would be the cream lol

 

[Footywizard]

We wouldn’t take either of them because they don’t want to play for North.

Who cares there in the draft play where you're picked. Just means we get them for free and can deal them out the next year if they don't wanna stay....win win

 

[DesertRoo]

And it can't be Hill as he is contracted


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Sorry I meant Bobby rather then Bradley.
If we secure one, I doubt we’ll have an issue with the other coming in.

 

[speedy]

If we land a quality player with our PSD1, the AFL will abolish it for good. Just add another rule change to the list.

 

[Footywizard]

Tucker has to do a medical with us. It's not a sure thing, let alone something that we will let get in the way of the Logue trade*

*The most important trade of our off season considering age, need, talent

Didn't say it would get in the way of a logue trade....may get in the way or walking logue to the draft and also getting tucker. That's all I was saying

 

[Rooboys Rool]

First of all, I think we should stop referring to what the AFL has given us as priority picks. To say that they've given us some future assistance picks, or SFA picks for short, is a better description. Anyway:

Start with picks 1, 55, 65 & 73.

Trade 1 - Trade both SFA picks to Freo for Logue and pick 41 (which Freo receives from Melbourne in the Jackson trade). Can't say that I'm that keen on Tucker and would rather try to use the second SFA pick to trade back into this draft.

Trade 2 - Our 2023 2nd pick to Gold Coast for picks 25 & 31. Something like this is actually on the cards since Dunkley nominated Brisbane - prior to that Gold Coast we very well placed to trade up for Brisbane's first, but they may now look to trade some of their 2nd round picks for 2023 picks, noting they won't have many list spots available this year and need points for academy picks next year.

Trade 3 - Picks 31 & 41 to Essington for pick 22. Assuming a Davey bid is likely to come before pick 22.

Trade 4 - Picks 55 & 65 (and a non-Ashcroft bid) to Brisbane for their 2023 2nd rounder.

Trade 5 - Pick 73 and our 2023 4th rounder to Melbourne for Bedford and pick 68.

At the draft take Wardlaw (2), Hayes (25), Lemmey or Scully (28) and use pick 68 to take Harvey or match the bid on him.

Out: Turner, J Walker*, Bosenavulagi, Hayden & P Walker. Delist Spicer & Mahony to re-draft in the rookie draft.
In: Logue, Bedford, Wardlaw, Hayes, Lemmey/Scully, Harvey and a key forward as DFA^.

*Would prefer to work out a deal with Polec and delist him, then keep J Walker on the list. We've clearly had a severe shortage of KPDs this year and bringing in Logue doesn't remedy that altogether. I hope we draft a KPD and someone like Walker to guide them through their first year in the VFL would be ideal. If we do delist Josh, would be good if we signed him up to the VFL squad.

^Not sure who, but for mature depth I'd look through the delisted free agents for someone who could play CHF. Intent would be to play Comben all year in the seniors, but if his body continues to fail him, then someone who can step up if need be. Would also offer support to Edwards and hopefully a KPF draftee in the VFL forward line.

 

[blackshadow]

How about pick 1 for logue, tucker and pick 13?

 

[ohh_v]

If we land a quality player with our PSD1, the AFL will abolish it for good. Just add another rule change to the list.

The way it’s going, if the AFL get a sniff that that’s what we are planning, they will abolish it before we even get a chance to use it.

 

[Heaps of fun]

I don't know mate, I feel like my hypothetical is more likely than the idea we're going to get Logue for a future 3rd or we're going to 'walk' him to the psd

Along with trading pick 1, the historical rarity I don't need to go into, it was this idea:

I just really don't think that the future 2nd PP is going to be enough for Logue, his contract status notwithstanding - and i don't think the PSD threat is viable at all. we weren't the only suitors, and i suspect that if it got to that Logue would be happy to accept a deal elsewhere at a team that would be willing to actually cough up the mid to late first rounder that a talented 25 year old key defender should rightly cost.

That I find absurd. I can't think of a single time this has happened, at least since I started really paying attention to player movements (around 2011). A player, who is uncontracted, changing his club of preference - during the trade period - because the club he has told he wants to join won't stump up enough for the club that is he is leaving. Compare this to the PSD route that has been used twice in the past three trade seasons.

 

[The Nostradamus]

Tanner bruhn is the other id be eyeing for the PSD

GWS will demand something decent and cats may not come to the party

 

[Scottroo]

I wonder what GWS would do for us if we publicly came out and said once the Logue deal is done, we’d take Tarranto or Hopper in the PSD