Vanders with damage control
-
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
List Mgmt. 2024 List Management thread - Trade Targets Part 2
- Thread starter go_the_dockers
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
Vanders with damage control
- Apr 25, 2011
- 8,764
- 21,444
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Oct 19, 2020
- 31,998
- 43,699
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,003
The point is that if you want a contracted player , you need to pay overs.
He would give you a definate shot at a flag.
Draft picks 7 and 12 are equvalent to pick 2 by the draft calculator.
We would probably consider that but nothing less I reckon.
I don't know if you've noticed our recent trade history, but we are well aware what happens with contracted players. We'll pay plenty enough that at least half our supporters will be livid.
But none of that leads to you getting our 3 firsts with nothing significant coming back and you're just setting yourself up for disappointment if you think that's what happens.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
R u ok mate? Anyone you need us to call? You seem a little confused and lost.
We get the deal done early and move on. This year’s highest 1st and next year’s 1st. Back ourselves in to improve.
If what the article says is true, there’s a personal family part at play and clubs aren’t generally arseholes when it comes to that (apart from a couple).
Collingwood came in with a fair offer for Schultz last year and the deal got done quickly. As long as we don’t low-ball, could be one of the first trades to happen.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
If what the article says is true, there’s a personal family part at play and clubs aren’t generally arseholes when it comes to that (apart from a couple).
Collingwood came in with a fair offer for Schultz last year and the deal got done quickly. As long as we don’t low-ball, could be one of the first trades to happen.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- Oct 19, 2020
- 31,998
- 43,699
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,007
Picks 7 and 12 minimum considering that it has been confirmed by his manager that there was no trade request.
Any chance you could consider stand up comedy? Maybe take your jokes elsewhere [emoji1782]
On SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Oct 19, 2020
- 31,998
- 43,699
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,009
Ok we'll keep him then.
9+14 with later exchanges is in the ballpark I think. Pending changes to our picks (likely to be 9,10,14-16).
Purple Jesus
not jess
CaseySibosadoHOF
Club Legend
- Sep 17, 2022
- 1,273
- 3,250
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
West Coast will surely be about as much of an option as they were for Luke Jackson. They may well spin the media narrative that they want it to happen, but they'd have to be on Class A drugs to think moving for a 26 year old at the start of next year for a top 3 pick is a good idea for a rebuilding team.
That aside, I'd be happy if our pick is 12 at this rate. "Honourable loss in an away elimination final" is better than "somehow missed finals after being 3rd a month ago" which is looking like the likelier option.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 31,998
- 43,699
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,014
It means he's happy to stay if a deal is not reached which is different to demanding a trade.
You'd be mad not to make a play for him. He would be the missing jigsaw puzzle piece in a premiership tilt.
Since we’re playing this game so early: “Ok good luck with a player who doesn’t want to be at your club”.
If it’s true and he has requested a trade and there’s family reasons behind it, trade will get done. And the more trade value Freo gives, the more of the salary Richmond will carry.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Not at the cost of a Tim Kelly trade, thanks.
Do you want to trade him or not? ****ing lol.
One minute..he’s happy to stay and we’ll only accept overs.
Next minute..you’d be crazy not to make a play for him…c’mon make a
play for him ..I’ll be your friend.
He will come to Freo with the exchange of two 1st rounders. Small possibly of a late Richmond pick coming back to us.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 31,998
- 43,699
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,018
He hasn't requested a trade according to his manager.
Purple Jesus
not jess
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 31,998
- 43,699
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,020
No way in the world.
- Apr 25, 2011
- 8,764
- 21,444
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Bawahahaa. We have been graced with the presense of the Richmond list manager.
- Oct 19, 2020
- 31,998
- 43,699
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,022
The club has told Shai he won't be traded unless it's a very good deal.Bawahahaa. We have been graced with the presense of the Richmond list manager.
- Apr 25, 2011
- 8,764
- 21,444
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
What do you think the direction for the Tigers List Managment is?
Are they going to draft heavy or trade for players or a bit of both?
- Oct 19, 2020
- 31,998
- 43,699
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #1,025
Bolton’s manager Anthony Van Der Wielen told Foxsports.com.au in a statement he “has not requested a trade” but confirmed there were “ongoing discussions with Richmond throughout the season where he has indicated that he would be open to the idea of returning home to Perth if a suitable deal can be struck that benefits all parties involved.
“With a young family and strong ties to Perth, the prospect of being closer to home is appealing to him. However, Shai is not making any demands of Richmond and fully understands that he has four years remaining on his current contract.”
- Status
