Nat Fyfe was denied his 1st Brownlow in 2014. That year was truly corrupt and I’ll go to my grave believing thatahhh...
Historical context.
Kill or be killed!
One umpire?
One camera?
Revenge served cold?
My hazy memory is that Fairest and Best once was the ultimate accolade.
Sometime or other this seems to have become Best and Fairest.
subtle change?
Or precursor to the perennial suggestions that we need to get rid of the disqualification that findings of even minor transgressions bring?
Is it fair and reasonable for say, a Scott Pendelbury, to be denied a Brownlow for a "love tap"?
What kind of game do we want? Can we afford?
The AFL conspired with Hawks to pin a striking charge on him after the high bump farce.
Fyfe is a triple Brownlow medallist.
The other player denied fairness was Chris Grant.