Bianconeri
Norm Smith Medallist
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2022
- Posts
- 7,606
- Reaction score
- 11,795
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
People are keen to keep the number low because like 2023 this list looks capable of a premiership and people don’t want to cut anyone who can contribute to that. Plus with the increased squad rotation this season people are seeing the value of keeping depth.Expect 10.
Dean, Macrae, AJ, Markov there's an easy 4
A few of the older guys will retire, the odd trade request.
Why are people so keen to keep the turnover number low just to retain players who won't make it? Macrae ain't gonna make it - I rather a kid and give him a go to another season of Macrae in the VFL
Out of the 4 easy delists you named I could make the case for three of them to stay.
Which older guys will retire? We’ve been saying older guys will retire since Fly got in but not a single one of the has. Our only retiree under Fly is Murphy and that was due to concussion not to age.
Currently the only older guy outside our best 22 is Mitchell but he’s still got the second half of the season to force his way back. Maybe Cox and WHE aren’t either but they’re always first in when a spot opens up.
There will be trade candidate/s but there’s no one obvious to put up as trade bait.
Since Fly came in aside from the first season we’ve also been much stingier when it comes to the draft. Before we used to draft 4-5 players are year and turn them over after their first contract ran out if they weren’t good enough. Now we draft around 2-3 each year but sign them up until after their first contract finished before they’ve even played a game.
People are putting up low turnover numbers because the number of obvious delist/retire candidates are low. The rest is speculation and naturally people are conservative when it comes to speculation.
10 may not be an unreasonable number, but it hard to see it at this point and time.
Last edited:




they are going to be no good for years.



