Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
... But I inherited a mess, I inherited a mess in so many ways. I inherited a mess in the Middle East, and a mess with North Korea, I inherited a mess with jobs, despite the statistics, you know, my statistics are even better, but they are not the real statistics because you have millions of people that can’t get a job, ok. And I inherited a mess on trade. I mean we have many, you can go up and down the ladder. But that’s the story. Hey look, in the mean time, I guess, I can’t be doing so badly, because I’m president, and you’re not. You know. Say hello to everybody OK?
Goes to show that even the GOP didn't think that Trump would win. They didn't really plan to have to do anything for another 4 years.7 years of promising to repeal and replace, you'd think they'd have something, that was more than a bucket of s**t thrown together at the last minute, ready to go. No such luck.
Also wonderful to see that soulless, spineless, moron, Paul Ryan get his comeuppance.
The Times goes on to correct him as wellThis is the greatest. Trump is a lying piece of s**t, he just can't help himself.
http://theslot.jezebel.com/we-redacted-everything-thats-not-a-verifiably-true-stat-1793571837
Who knew Health Care could be so complicated?
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/br...l/news-story/772c0286ca2607b69099c24d59f80258
But Donald is the master negotiator, negotiation is what Donald does best:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/...e-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
This covers it quite wellThe real problem with all this is that
- Trump has caved in to the lunatic fringe's demands that the new system remove requirements that health insurance provide basic benefits like maternity care, emergency services, mental health and wellness visits, but
- the loonies still aren't happy, they're insisting that the system be emasculated even further.
It points up the problem I've mentioned in the past; the loonies are in full control of Congress and are going to indulge in an orgy of wet dreams while people are diverted by Trump's buffoonery.
This covers it quite well
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/...-cover-aromatherapy-but-not-chemotherapy.html
Are we meant to be taking his words literally, or not at the moment? I never can tell.
Six months ago Trey Gowdy wanted to bear Comey's children. So disappointing to see a messy break up in public.
I hope you fully understand the depths the GOP will go to shield, cover, misguide and lie to the American people. It's infuriating to see this guy is more concerned with whistleblowers than the potential corrupt White House colluding with Russia.
Obfuscate and distract from the important issue, this is Gowdy's role, he serves no other purpose, a bilious fool.
Benghazi was a red herring. Gowdy knew it. He wants to distract from real issues.
Agreed. However, I wouldn't cover either of them. Chemotherapy is a poisonous treatment. There must be another way to treat cancer.Gives a whole new meaning to "sniff test".
This is the Trump Appreciation thread. We wouldn't mind if you, Gough and Co took your criticisms to the appropriate thread. Thanks very much."He's a straight talker, I like that"
Next minute
"What he meant was..."
There are. Surgery, radiotherapy and sometimes immunotherapy. However some cancers only respond to chemotherapyAgreed. However, I wouldn't cover either of them. Chemotherapy is a poisonous treatment. There must be another way to treat cancer.
It looks like he's moved on to pretending to drive a truck. So much winning right there.There will be so much winning, you'll be sick of all the winning:
I've never understood the rights love for Gowdy, plenty of right wingers on here were posting youtube clips of Gowdy "schooling" various people. All i see was a partisan a-hole who was obviously a stupid hack. He just keeps reinforcing my opinion.
Agreed. However, I wouldn't cover either of them. Chemotherapy is a poisonous treatment. There must be another way to treat cancer.
The Guardian and Washington Post, which broke the Snowden story.Which defended Assange or Snowden
Make your case for his Presidency then, and a case that relies on conventional standards of decency, and politicking, not all these recently devised conventions that always end up with Trump being the second coming of Ronald Reagan. Who wasn't much good in the first place just quietly.This is the Trump Appreciation thread. We wouldn't mind if you, Gough and Co took your criticisms to the appropriate thread. Thanks very much.
This is the Trump Appreciation thread. We wouldn't mind if you, Gough and Co took your criticisms to the appropriate thread. Thanks very much.
There was no case for him or Clinton. Trump just happens to be miles better than Clinton in the pecking order of s**t.Make your case for his Presidency then, and a case that relies on conventional standards of decency, and politicking, not all these recently devised conventions that always end up with Trump being the second coming of Ronald Reagan. Who wasn't much good in the first place just quietly.