sherb
Hall of Famer
No such thing.Anyone would agree to be ruled by a dictator if they were the perfect leader.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No such thing.Anyone would agree to be ruled by a dictator if they were the perfect leader.
I think you're onto something as a lot of these people get away with crap and are usually outed when something political gets in the way.Unlike some on here, I like to get my news from various sites, Goggle further and post only those that appear interesting.
So much we don't know, was Schneiderman getting close to something Cohen and Dirtbag didn't want to come out?
Only fascists believe this.No such thing.
The compliment is equivalent to saying you are smarter then the mentally disabled kid. Reach higher.Aw shucks, I feel like a celebrity strutting through this forum with all the high-level compliments I'm receiving
Video unavailable. read the supposed transcript, still can't see evidence of the 'traitor' part.
No they wouldn't. Smart people don't want to be ruled by any person or party. They want to be ruled by a rule of law based on humanist principles.Anyone would agree to be ruled by a dictator if they were the perfect leader.
A good post, except for seemingly blaming the right exclusively for utopia not flourishing. Marxism specifically calls for dictators, and has done it's share of harm, in addition to that wicked Reagan.We're human, we're flawed (in some cases deeply... ahem Trump). People have been at this society 'thing' for thousands of years and a western democracy is the best way found so far, sure we could keep to ourselves and wait till a more organised larger force comes along to take what we have.
The greatest advancements in societal happiness, medicine, sciences etc came all after WW2 when western civilization socialized democracy, allows everyone to flourish and become the most they can be, then Reagan came along and decided that we should go back to oligarchical system which leads to inequality and social unhappiness.
So is the inference in all this was that Cohen and Trump knew about the allegations about Schneiderman. The same guy who forced trump to settle the uni fraud for 25 mil. So by sheer coincidence the allegations came out sinking Scheneiderman . Payback for uni case by Trump?First I'm hearing about this, you should be a journo or at least contact Avenatti. I bet he's all over this and saving it for down the track when he wants to step on Cohen's throat again.
Speaking of which apparently Cohen who likes to strut around and pretend he's the big time whatever it is he's pretending to be this week goes white white and suddenly shuts up whenever Avenatti's name is mentioned. <<<
It literally doesn't.Marxism specifically calls for dictators
Conservative means don't want change. These people clearly want change. Scary change based on a romantic vision of the past that never actually existed. Its the exact same thing that propelled the NAZI movement.I just call them 'conservatives'. That is where most of their links come from.
It calls for a centralised undemocratic body to make decisions. How is that not a dictatorship?It literally doesn't.
Marxism doesn't.It calls for a centralised undemocratic body to make decisions. How is that not a dictatorship?
The great advances of society started around the time of the enlightenment in the mid 18th century. It didnt begin after world war 2. Although it did continue after the second world war.We're human, we're flawed (in some cases deeply... ahem Trump). People have been at this society 'thing' for thousands of years and a western democracy is the best way found so far, sure we could keep to ourselves and wait till a more organised larger force comes along to take what we have.
The greatest advancements in societal happiness, medicine, sciences etc came all after WW2 when western civilization socialized democracy, allows everyone to flourish and become the most they can be, then Reagan came along and decided that we should go back to oligarchical system which leads to inequality and social unhappiness.
So who leads under theoretical Marxism and why have all these countries that attempted Marxism become bloody dictatorships?Marxism doesn't.
Again what makes him a traitor?Songbird McCain is as establishment as they come, hence he is more suited to the Hillary/Barry DNC. He is a jealous loser who couldn't win the presidency and is envious of the man who did what he couldn't. He is the definition of a warhawk, ironically being defended by the left merely because he is anti-Trump.
That is an unbelievably stupid response. Fascists can be left or right wing. A dictator is a dictator regardless of his views. The alt right want to get rid of the Democratic institutions and reduce the power of the courts. So yes they are fascists. Just like Hitler, Stalin, Putin, Pol Pot and Erdogen. No different.But fascism is left wing you dolt
Marx didnt really talk about what post capitalist society looked like or how it was organised.So who leads under theoretical Marxism and why have all these countries that attempted Marxism become bloody dictatorships?
Aw shucks, I feel like a celebrity strutting through this forum with all the high-level compliments I'm receiving
That is an unbelievably stupid response. Fascists can be left or right wing. A dictator is a dictator regardless of his views. The alt right want to get rid of the Democratic institutions and reduce the power of the courts. So yes they are fascists. Just like Hitler, Stalin, Putin, Pol Pot and Erdogen. No different.
There is no such thing as textbook leftism.Fascism is textbook leftism.
What an unbelievably stupid response